Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Negative association of endothelial nitric oxide gene polymorphism with hypertension in Turkish patients: effect of ecNOS polymorphism on left ventricular hypertrophy

  • Ayhan Olcay1Email author,
  • C Gokhan Ekmekci2,
  • Ugur Ozbek2,
  • Murat Sezer1,
  • Cem Barcin3,
  • Erol Arslan3,
  • Bilal Boztosun4 and
  • Yilmaz Nisanci1
Cardiovascular Ultrasound20064:33

DOI: 10.1186/1476-7120-4-33

Received: 25 June 2006

Accepted: 21 August 2006

Published: 21 August 2006

Abstract

Background

Endothelial nitric oxide synthase produces nitric oxide which is involved in many physiologic regulatory functions. Variable number of tandem repeats in intron 4 of endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene are reported to be associated with blood pressure regulation. Nitric oxide is involved in regulation of cardiomyocyte genes but it is not known If endothelial nitric oxide synthase 4 gene polymorphisms are related with left ventricular hypertrophy. We studied endothelial nitric oxide synthase 4a/b allele status in hypertensive and normotensive patients and echocardiographic parameters in a subgroup of hypertensive group.

Methods

We performed a case-control study involving 110 Turkish hypertensive patients and 87 controls. All subjects were genotyped for endothelial nitric oxide synthase 4a/b polymorphism. Echocardiographic measurements were obtained in 94 of the hypertensive patients.

Results

Endothelial nitric oxide synthase 4a/b genotype frequencies were 6.4%, 23.6%, 70% in hypertensives and 1.1%, 18.4%, 80.5% in controls for a/a, a/b, b/b, respectively. Left ventricular dimensions, mass and diastolic indices were not different across endothelial nitric oxide synthase 4 genotypes. Patients with 4a/a genotype had higher interventricular septal thickness than the other group; 14.83(1.6), 11.91(1.51), 12.21(1.56) for a/a, a/b, b/b, respectively and p = 0.0001.

Conclusion

Endothelial nitric oxide synthase 4a/b gene polymorphism is not associated with hypertension in Turkish patients. 4a/a genotype was associated with higher interventricular septal thickness in hypertensive patients.

Background

Endothelial nitric oxide synthase (ecNOS; NOS3) produces nitric oxide (NO) from L-arginine. NO has diverse physiologic regulatory functions and is involved in smooth muscle relaxation, inhibition of platelet aggregation, immune regulation, neurotransmission and blood pressure regulation [13]. NO deficiency induces vascular and cardiac hypertrophy and inhibition of ecNOS reduces coronary flow and raises blood pressure [4, 5]. NO regulates expression of genes in cardiac myocytes that are important in cardiac hypertrophy and failure. In cDNA expression array analysis 10 genes out of the 1176 endothelial genes were consistently up- or downregulated by NO [6]. ecNOS is encoded by a gene located on chromosome 7q35–36, expressed in endothelium. Some ecNOS alleles affect nitric oxide levels and cardiovascular system. There are two alleles identified in intron 4 of the ecNOS gene. The larger allele, 4b, consists of five tandem 27-bp repeats (variable number of tandem repeats-VNTR) and smaller one, 4a, has four repeats [7, 8]. An association of the 4a allele of the ecNOS gene with coronary artery disease and renal disease was reported [811]. The intron 4 VNTR polymorphism was associated with altered plasma NO levels and variations in plasma nitrite and nitrate levels [9, 12]. However, conflicting data have appeared in the literature concerning the association between this variant and hypertension. In fact, the intron 4 VNTR polymorphisms were associated with hypertension in one Japanese study but other studies found no association [1315]. Interethnic differences in NO-mediated vasodilation may result from disproportionate distribution of ecNOS variants in ethnic groups. Interethnic differences in ecNOS variants may result in a higher incidence and severity of hypertension in African-Americans. Genetic determinants underlying interethnic differences in drug response can help to predict the drug effects and improve therapy [1618]. To the best of our knowledge there is no data about ecNOS4a/b polymorphism in Turkish hypertensive patients.

In our study we examined ecNOS gene intron 4 VNRT polymorphism in hypertensive and normotensive Turkish patients. Echocardiographic examinations were obtained in a subgroup of hypertensive patients and relationship between echocardiographic left ventricular indices and ecNOS intron 4 VNRT polymorphism determined.

Methods

Study population

A total of 110 hypertensive patients who were under drug treatment were included into the study from Istanbul School of Medicine Cardiology Department. Blood samples were obtained from 90 healthy individuals applying to outpatient clinic of internal medicine with nonspecific complaints. All of the hypertensive patients were on one or more antihypertensive drugs. Patients were all in mild to moderate hypertension group. Hypertension control was assessed by the cardiologist in the outpatient clinic and all patients were reported to have a well controlled hypertension. DNA for analysis was not available for three subjects in control group. Echocardiographic measurements were obtained in 94 hypertensive patients. Patients who had rheumatic valvular disease, myocardial infarction, renal disease and secondary hypertension were not enrolled into the study. Ethics committee approval and informed consent was obtained from all patients. Anthropometric measurements and clinical parameters were determined by a questionnaire based study. Echocardiographic and genotype data were obtained by independent observers unaware of the other test results.

Genotyping

Detection of eNOS polymorphism

ecNOS4a/b genotypes were determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using oligonucleotide primers (sense: 5'-AGGCCCTATGGTAGTGCCTTT-3' ; antisense, 5'-TCTCTTAGTGCTGTGGTCAT-3' Prizma Laboratory Products Industry and Trade Co. LTD., Istanbul, TR) that flank the region of the 27 bp direct repeat in intron 4 as described previously with minor modifications [11]. Reactions were performed in a total volume of 50 μL containing 500 ng genomic DNA, 10 pmol of each primer, 0.2 mM dNTP, 0.5 U Taq DNA polymerase, 5 μL PCR buffer (500 mmol/L KCL, 100 mmol tri-hidroksimetil-aminometan chloride and 0.8% Nonidet P40). The thermocycling (Perkin Elmer Cetus, DNA Thermal Cycler 480, USA and Eppendorf Mastercycler Personal 5332, Germany) procedure consisted of initial denaturation at 94° for 5 min, 35 cycles of denaturation for 94° for 1 min, annealing at 55° for 1 min, extension at 72° for 1 min. The PCR products were analyzed using 3% agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. The large allele, ecNOS4b, contains 5 tandem 27 bp repeat and the smaller allele, ecNOS4a, contains 4 repeats. The size of the PCR products were 393 bp and 420 bp for the ecNOS4a and ecNOS4b alleles, respectively.

Echocardiography

All patients were studied by M-mode echocardiography to determine left ventricular size (left ventricular end diastolic diameter- LVED, left ventricular end systolic diameter-LVES, interventricular septum-IVS and posterior wall thickness-PW) by three expert sonographers with two recorders (Vingmed System V and Vivid III, General Electric). Pulsed doppler velocimetry was used to determine peak early (E) and late atrial (A) diastolic transmitral velocities. Penn convention criteria were applied for measurement of left ventricular dimension and calculation of LV mass-LVM [19]. Left ventricular mass index-LVMI was calculated by indexation of LVM to body surface area. LV ejection fraction was calculated according to the modified Simpson formula [20].

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS for Windows release 7.5.1. Percentages were compared by X2 analysis. According to ecNOS4a/b allele status, continuous data were compared with the use of ANOVA. Effects of NOS4a/b allele status on LV mass index (obtained by indexation of LVM to body surface area), LVED/m2 (LVED indexed to body surface area), LVES/m2 (LVES indexed to body surface area) LV ejection fraction (EFM), fractional shortening (FS), diastolic E and A velocities were examined with multiple linear regression analysis after adjustment for age, gender, body mass index, atrial fibrillation (AF), diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension treatment status (HTTx). LV hypertrophy (LVH) was defined as an LV mass index of > 134 g/m2 in men or > 110 g/m2 in women. Left ventricular hypertrophy (absence or presence) was analyzed as a categorical variable by logistic regression. Continuous data are summarized as mean ± SD or as median. All tests were two sided, and a P value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance

Results

Genotype frequencies

We genotyped 110 hypertensive patients and 87 healthy controls for the ecNOS 4a/b gene polymorphism. Clinical characteristics of the study group are summerized in Table 1. There was no significant differences between groups with respect to sex distribution and presence of diabetes mellitus. Control group subjects were younger than hypertensive patients, 40.53(15.83) vs 59.41(10.14) and p = 0.0001. Smoking was more frequent in control group, 34.5 vs 21.8 and p = 0.048.
Table 1

Clinical characteristics of the study group

Characteristic

HT

n = 110

NT

n = 87

P

Age, year

59.41(10.14)

40.53(15.83)

0.0001

Sex, M/F %

39.1/60.9

47.8/52.2

0.21

Smoking, %

21.8

34.5

0.048

Diabetes Mellitus, %

16.4

5.6

0.17

HT: hypertensive subjects, NT: healthy controls

The distribution of genotypes and allele frequencies were compared between patients and controls in Table 2. The genotype frequencies were in agreement with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. ecNOS4a/b genotype frequencies in hypertensives were 6.4%, 23.6%, 70% for aa, ab, bb, respectively and 1.1%, 18.4%, 80.5% for aa, ab, bb, respectively in control group. Genotype frequencies were not statistically different between groups (X2 = 4.59, p = 0.10).
Table 2

ecNOS4a/b genotype distribution in hypertensive patients and controls

ecNOS4a/b genotypes

HT

NT

a/a, n, (%)

7 (6.4)

1 (1.1)

a/b, n, (%)

26 (23.6)

16 (18.4)

b/b, n, (%)

77 (70)

70 (80.5)

Total, n, (%)

110 (100)

87 (100)

X2 = 4.59 P = 0.10

HT: hypertensive subjects, NT: healthy controls

Echocardiographic measurements

Echocardiographic examinations were obtained from 94 patients in hypertensive group. Clinical characteristics of the hypertensive subgroup of patients according to ecNOS4 allele status are listed in Table 3. Age, sex, prevalence of smoking, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, duration of hypertension were not statistically different between three groups. All patients were receiving antihypertensive therapy and none of the patients consumed alcohol.
Table 3

Clinical characteristics of hypertensive patients included in echocardiographic substudy

Characteristic

ecNOS4a/b polymorphism

 
 

a/a

n = 6

a/b

n = 22

b/b

n = 66

p

Sex, M/F

1/5

8/14

26/40

X2 = 1.22

p = 0.54

Age, y

59(10.06)

62.14(9.21)

58.28 (10.639)

0.30

DM, %

33.3

18.2

15.2

0.51

Smoking, %

16.6

22.7

19.7

0.93

Alcohol, %

0

0

0

--

AF, %

33.3

9.1

6.1

0.70

HT age

5.83(2.04)

6.59(3.23)

9.02(7.4)

0.20

HT Tx, %

100

100

100

--

DM: diabetes mellitus, AF: atrial fibrillation, HT age: duration of hypertension, HT Tx: treatment for hypertension.

Echocardiographic measurements are listed in Table 4. Left ventricular end systolic and end diastolic dimensions indexed to body surface area, posterior wall thickness, left ventricular ejection fraction, fractional shortening, left ventricular mass index, early diastolic transmitral peak velocity (E), late diastolic transmitral peak velocity and left atrial sizes showed no statistically significant differences across aa, ab or bb genotypes. Interventricular septal thickness was 14.83(1.6), 11.91(1.51), 12.21(1.56) for aa, ab, bb, respectively and p = 0.0001. Patients with 4a/a genotype had higher septal thickness than the other groups and difference was statistically significant. Left ventricular hypertrophy was present in 75.3% of the study population. Left ventricular hypertropy percentages were not statistically different across ecNOS4 genotypes.
Table 4

Echocardiographic measurements and ecNOS4a/b genotypes in hypertensive patients included in echocardiographic substudy

Variable

ecNOS4a/b polymorphism

 
 

a/a

a/b

b/b

p

LVEDD

27.22(2.93)

27.72(4.53)

27.65(5.03)

0.93

LVESD

17.44(3.25)

18.61(5.18)

18.32(5.26)

0.89

IVS, mm

14.83(1.6)

11.91(1.51)

12.21(1.56)

0.0001

PW, mm

12.17(1.94)

10.95(1.43)

10.74(1.51)

0.92

LV EF, %

65.33(8.45)

60.82(14.61)

61.97(14.33)

0.78

LV FS, %

36.17(7.11)

33.14(10.22)

34.06(9.69)

0.78

LVMI, g/m2

173.5(27.29)

141.77(37.31)

151.78(56.32)

0.39

LVH, %

100

77.3

72.3

X2 = 2.23

p = 0.31

E, cm/s

57(26.06)

64.53(21.06)

72.05(24.3)

0.33

A, cm/s

96(16.64)

77.94(13.75)

80.93(26.77)

0.49

LA size, mm

43(12.81)

39.5(6.26)

37.26(5.42)

0.56

LVEDD: left ventricular end-diastolic dimension mm/m2, LVESD: left ventricular end-systolic dimension mm/m2, IVS: interventricular septal thickness mm/m2, PW: posterior wall thickness mm/m2, LV FS: left ventricular fractional shortening, LVMI: left ventricular mass index (Penn formula), E: early diastolic transmitral peak velocity, A: late diastolic transmitral peak velocity, LA: left atrium size mm.

Discussion

The results of our study indicate that ecNOS4a/b polymorphism is not associated with with hypertension, left ventricular dimension or mass but is associated with interventricular septal thickness. To our knowledge there was no previous study about relation of ecNOS4a/b polymorphism with hypertension in Turkish population. Most of the previous studies about ecNOS4a/b polymorphism and hypertension in literature are negative association studies and we examined whether there is any positive association in our study population [10, 15]. A previous Turkish study showed that patients with myocardial infarction had higher frequency of a/a genotype, 4.3% [21]. In the study genotype distribution in normal population was 0.6% for a/a, 18% for a/b and 81.4% for the b/b genotype. There was no statistically significant difference in ecNOS4a/b allele percentages between cases and controls. The defect in NO production in hypertension could involve a gene other than ecNOS4. In fact, discrepancies in association studies may also result from consideration limited to only one polymorphism rather than combinations of polymorphisms. In particular, recent data suggest that individual eNOS genotypes are not reliable markers of risk for developing hypertension, but study of eNOS haplotypes may provide much more appropriate information [22, 23].

In 94 of the hypertensive patients we obtained echocardiographic measurements to see whether any subgroup of ecNOS4a/b polymorphism is associated with left ventricular dimensions or mass. Although there are previous animal studies about effect of NO on vascular and cardiac myocytes, relation of ecNOS4a/b polymorphism with left ventricular hypertrophy and function in hypertension was not examined in humans previously [13]. In a previous human study ecNOS Glu298Asp polymorphism was not found to be related with blood pressure, left ventricular mass or carotid intima media thickness [24]. In another study three polymorphisms including -922A>G, intron 4VNTR, and Glu298Asp of the eNOS gene were investigated and no associations between single polymorphisms or haplotypes of the ecNOS gene and systolic blood pressure or left ventricular mass were found [25].

In our hypertensive subgroup of patients left ventricular dimensions, left ventricular mass index and left ventricular diastolic indices were not different in ecNOS4a/b subgroups. On the other hand interventricular septal thickness was higher in a/a genotype; 14.83(1.69) for a/a, 11.91(1.51) for a/b, 12.21(1.56) for bb and p = 0.0001. Although all patients were under hypertension treatment, septal hypertrophy in a/a genotypes may be due to higher susceptibility of those patients for hypertrophy. Relation of ecNOS4a/b polymorphism and left ventricular hypertrophy needs to be determined in untreated hypertensive patients to see if there is a similar association in untreated patients.

Limitations of our study are that all study patients were treated with different drugs and a detailed subgroup analysis can not be done due to small sample size. Echocardiographic measurements may be suboptimal when compared to toher methods like magnetic resonance imaging.

In conclusion ecNOS4a/b polymorphism is not associated with hypertension in Turkish population. Echocardiographic left ventricular dimensions and left ventricular mass are not associated with ecNOS4a/b polymorphism in treated hypertensive patients. Interventricular septal thickness is increased in patients with ecNOS4 a/a genotype. Relation of ecNOS4a/b genotype and left ventricular hypertrophy needs to be determined in untreated hypertensive patients. If genetic factors determining left ventricular hypertrophy and dilatation in hypertensive patients are determined, those patients under greater risk can be treated more aggressively and with drugs suitable to genetic markers.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to Naci Cine M.D. for his excellent technical assistance. Study was funded by a research grant receieved from Istanbul Faculty, Istanbul School of Medicine.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Cardiology, Istanbul School of Medicine
(2)
Department of Genetics, Istanbul School of Medicine, Institute for Experimental Medicine
(3)
Department of Cardiology, Ankara Gendarmerie Hospital
(4)
Department of Cardiology, Kosuyolu Heart Education and Research Hospital

References

  1. Moncada S, Higgs A: The L-arginine-nitric oxide pathway. N Engl J Med. 1993, 329: 2002-2012. 10.1056/NEJM199312303292706View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Schmidt HH, Walter U: NO at work. Cell. 1994, 78: 919-925. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90267-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Forte P, Copland M, Smith LM, Milne E, Sutherland J, Benjamin N: Basal nitric oxide synthesis in essential hypertension. Lancet. 1997, 349: 837-842. 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07631-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Devlin AM, Brosnan J, Graham D, Morton JJ, McPhaden AR, McIntyre M, Hamilton CA, Reid JL, Dominiczak AF: Vascular smooth muscle cell polyploidy and cardiomyocyte hypertrophy due to chronic NOS inhibition in vivo. Am J Physiol. 1998, 274: H52-H59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Haynes WG, Noon JP, Walker BR, Webb DJ: Inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis increases blood pressure in healthy humans. J Hypertens. 1993, 11: 1375-1380.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Heineke J, Kempf T, Kraft T, et al.: Downregulation of cytoskeletal muscle LIM protein by nitric oxide: impact on myocyte cardiac hypertrophy. Circulation. 2003, 107: 1424-1432. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000055319.94801.FCView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Nadaud S, Bonnardeaux A, Lathrop M, Soubrier F: Gene structure, polymorphism and mapping of the human endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1994, 198: 1027-1033. 10.1006/bbrc.1994.1146View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Wang Y, Kikuchi S, Suzuki H, Nagase S, Koyama A: Endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphism in intron 4 affects the progression of renal failure in non-diabetic renal diseases. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1999, 14: 2989-2902.Google Scholar
  9. Wang XL, Mahaney MC, Sim AS, Wang J, Wang I, Blangero J, Almasy L, Badenhop RB, Wilcken DE: Genetic contribution of the endothelial constitutive nitric oxide synthase gene to plasma nitric oxide levels. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997, 17: 3147-3153.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hibi K, Ishigami T, Tamura K, Mizushima S, Nyui N, Fujita T, Ochiai H, Kosuge M, Watanabe Y, Yoshii Y, Kihara M, Kimura K, Ishii M, Umemura S: Endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphism and acute myocardial infarction. Hypertension. 1998, 32: 521-526.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Matyar S, Attila G, Acarturk E, Akpinar O, Inal T: eNOS gene intron 4 a/b VNTR polymorphism is a risk factor for coronary artery disease in Southern Turkey. Clin Chim Acta. 2005, 354 (1–2): 153-158. 10.1016/j.cccn.2004.11.022View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Tsukada T, Yokoyama K, Arai T, Takemoto F, Hara S, Yamada A, Kawaguchi Y, Hosoya T, Igari J: Evidence of association of the ecNOS gene polymorphism with plasma NO metabolite levels in humans. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998, 245: 190-193. 10.1006/bbrc.1998.8267View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Uwabo J, Soma M, Nakayama T, Kanmatsuse K: Association of a variable number of tandem repeats in the endothelial constitutive nitric oxide synthase gene with essential hypertension in Japanese. Am J Hypertens. 1998, 11: 125-128. 10.1016/S0895-7061(97)00419-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Miyamoto Y, Saito Y, Kajiyama N, Yoshimura M, Shimasaki Y, Nakayama M, Kamitani S, Harada M, Ishikawa M, Kuwahara K, Ogawa E, Hamanaka I, Takahashi N, Kaneshige T, Teraoka H, Akamizu T, Azuma N, Yoshimasa Y, Yoshimasa T, Itoh H, Masuda I, Yasue H, Nakao K: Endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene is positively associated with essential hypertension. Hypertension. 1999, 32: 3-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Yasujima M, Tsutaya S, Shoji M: Endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphism and hypertension (in Japanese). Rinsho Byori Jap J Clin Pathol. 1998, 46: 1199-1204.Google Scholar
  16. Wood AJ: Racial differences in the response to drugs-pointers to genetic differences. N Eng J Med. 2001, 344: 1393-1396. 10.1056/NEJM200105033441811. 10.1056/NEJM200105033441811Google Scholar
  17. Stein CM, Lang CC, Xie HG, Wood AJ: Hypertension in black people: study of specific genotypes and phenotypes will provide a greater understanding of interindividual and interethnic variability in blood pressure regulation than studies based on race. Pharmacogenetics. 2001, 11: 95-110. 10.1097/00008571-200103000-00001View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Cardillo C, Kilcoyne CM, Cannon RO, Panza JA: Racial differences in nitric oxide-mediated vasodilator response to mental stress in the forearm circulation. Hypertension. 1998, 31: 1235-1239.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Devereux RB, Reicek N: Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass in man: anatomic validation of the method. Circulation. 1977, 55: 613-618.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, DeMaria A, Devereux R, Feigenbaum H, Gutfessell H, Reichek N, Sahn D, Schnittegr I, Silverman NH, Tajik AJ: Recommendations for the quantification of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiography. 1989, 2: 358-367.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Cine N, Hatemi AC, Erginel-Unaltuna N: Association of a polymorphism of the ecNOS gene with myocardial infarction in a subgroup of Turkish MI patients. Clin Genet. 2002, 61: 66-70. 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2002.610113.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Sandrim VC, Coelho EB, Nobre F, Arado GM, Lanchote VL, Tanus-Santos JE: Susceptible and protective eNOS haplotypes in hypertensive black and white subjects. Atherosclerosis. 2006, 186 (2): 428-432. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2005.08.003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Persu A, Vinck WJ, El Khattabi O, Janssen RG, Paulussen AD, Devuyst O, Vlietinck R, Fagard RH: Influence of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene on conventional and ambulatory blood pressure: sib-pair analysis and haplotype study. J Hypertens. 2005, 23 (4): 759-765. 10.1097/01.hjh.0000163144.74588.adView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Karvonen J, Kauma H, Kervinen K, Rantala M, Ikaheimo M, Paivansalo M, Savolainen MJ, Kesaniemi YA: Endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene Glu298Asp polymorphism and blood pressure, left ventricular mass and carotid artery atherosclerosis in a population-based cohort. Journal of Internal Medicine. 2002, 251: 102-110. 10.1046/j.1365-2796.2002.00933.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhu H, Wang X, Dong Y, Treiber FA, Snieder H: Influence of the eNOS gene on development of blood pressure and left ventricular mass: longitudinal findings in multiethnic youth. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2005, 15 (9): 669-675.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Olcay et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement