Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Prognostic implications of negative dobutamine stress echocardiography in African Americans compared to Caucasians

  • Ajay V Srivastava1,
  • Karthik Ananthasubramaniam1Email author,
  • Salil J Patel1,
  • Natesh Lingam1 and
  • Gordon Jacobsen2
Cardiovascular Ultrasound20086:20

DOI: 10.1186/1476-7120-6-20

Received: 31 March 2008

Accepted: 20 May 2008

Published: 20 May 2008

Abstract

Background

African Americans (AA) have higher rates of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality than Caucasians (CA). Despite its excellent negative predictive value, the influence of race on the prognostic implications of negative dobutamine echocardiography in predicting major cardiac problems is largely unknown.

Methods

We studied 387 AA and 340 CA patients with negative dobutamine stress echocardiography (NDSE). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to create freedom-from-event curves for major adverse cardiac events over a 36-month period, and a Cox proportional-hazards multivariable model to examine the influence of race on cardiac outcomes.

Results

AA patients were younger (69.4 ± 12.6 vs. 74.2 ± 10.7, p < .001), had higher incidence of diabetes mellitus (37% vs. 29%, p = .01), hypertension (91% vs. 85%, p = .006), left ventricular hypertrophy (70% vs. 49%, p < .001) and lower incidence of prior coronary artery disease (27% vs. 34%, p = .05) compared to CA patients. Ejection fraction ≥ 50% was comparable (81% vs. 82%, p = .8). At 3-years, AA patients had a lower freedom from nonfatal myocardial infarction (92% vs. 96%, p = .006) and any cardiac event (cardiac death, myocardial infarction) (91% vs. 95%, p = .005) compared to CA patients.

Conclusion

This is the first study to demonstrate that AA patients have higher rates of nonfatal MI and MACE compared to CA patients with a NDSE. These patients require closer follow-up and aggressive preventive and treatment strategies should be employed to help reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality despite negative ischemic workup.

Background

Cardiovascular disease accounts for significant morbidity and mortality in the United States [1, 2] and is a major cause of death in all race groups [3, 4]. Prior studies have shown that racial differences exist among the various ethnic groups and African Americans (AA) have the highest cardiac event rates [57]. Overall mortality in AA's has been attributed to racial disparities and other differences [512]. AA patients have a higher incidence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and obesity [13, 14], all of which are risk factors for cardiovascular mortality, and prior reports have shown that reduced access to health care and lower socio-economic status [13] also contribute to worse outcomes in this group.

Though there is data demonstrating that AA patients have a lower incidence of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) compared to Caucasian (CA) patients [15], they still have significant rates of myocardial infarction and other cardiac events. This has been partially attributed to a difference in the pathology of coronary arteriosclerosis in AA's compared to CA's. Prior studies have shown that AA's have a higher prevalence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors [13, 14], that collectively play a role causing dysfunction at the microvasculature level, and thereby contribute to endothelial dysfunction. These factors concurrently with an unstable plaque may play a role in higher events rather than the continuing progression of coronary artery plaque build-up as seen in CA's [16]. This dissimilarity in pathology between the 2 groups could have potential implications when interpreting diagnostic stress tests performed to rule out CAD.

Stress testing primarily aims to identify significant stenosis causing blunting of stress-induced flow reserve; myocardial perfusion imaging detects CAD based on regional heterogeneities in tracer uptake based on flow reserve abnormalities and stress echocardiography depends on ischemic wall motion abnormalities to develop. It has been demonstrated that when compared to CA's, AA's have lesser significant epicardial CAD in the presence of abnormal nuclear perfusion scans indicating that other factors such as endothelial dysfunction may play a role in these abnormal functional studies [17].

DSE (Dobutamine stress echocardiography) is routinely used for risk stratification [17, 18] carrying an approximate cardiac event rate of 1.1% to 1.5% per patient/year, a mortality rate of 0.13% per patient/year. A NDSE is associated with a high negative predictive value [1921], thereby adding valuable prognostic information. Yet, there is no reported literature to our knowledge comparing major adverse cardiovascular events during follow-up between AA and CA patients with a NDSE. Given the above-mentioned differences in cardiovascular disease process and testing between the two ethnic groups, it would be crucial to examine its implications on the prognostic value of a NDSE.

Methods

Study Population

This study was carried out at a large tertiary care center involving an unselected patient population. Between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 1999, 1000 consecutive patients who underwent DSE were screened retrospectively. After applying exclusion criteria (Patients with a positive DSE, younger than 18 years old, pregnant, mentally impaired) 756 patients formed the initial study group. Patients who underwent very early revascularization (< 2 months) after the index-NDSE were also excluded as these are driven by multiple factors including patient presentation, high clinical suspicion in the setting of a NDSE. Given very early revascularization following a NDSE they were excluded to ascertain the natural long-term outcomes following NDSE. Only the first event data was used for patients with more than one event. After excluding patients of other ethnicities, 727 patients with NDSE formed the final study group. Indications for performing the DSE included chest pain (36.2%), pre-operative clearance (17.3%), evaluation for shortness of breath (6.8%), evaluation for CAD (21.9%), and miscellaneous causes (17.8%). The institutional review board at the Henry Ford Hospital approved the study. For purposes of our study, hypertension was defined as office visit documentation of hypertension history or patient being on antihypertensive therapy. Diabetes mellitus was assumed to be present if there was documentation of diabetes mellitus in an office note, or the patient was on antihyperglycemics (oral anti-diabetics or insulin). Hypercholesterolemia was present if office notes mentioned a history of hyperlipidemia or if the patient was on an anti-hyperlipidemic medication. Heart failure was defined as the presence of a history of systolic heart failure or left ventricular ejection fraction < 50% or documented history of diastolic heart failure with EF ≥ 50%. CAD was defined as a history of previous MI/angina or history of percutaneous intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting.

Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography Protocol

Images were obtained in the parasternal long-axis and short-axis, apical 4-chamber, 2-chamber, and apical long-axis at baseline, and after each incremental dose of dobutamine. Images were digitally stored at baseline, low, intermediate, and high doses to facilitate quad screen display and analysis. Recovery images were also obtained and stored on videotape. In the case of suboptimal digital capture quality; a tape review was performed for interpretation. Heart rate, blood pressure, and 12-lead electrocardiograms were recorded at baseline and monitored through each stage. After baseline images, dobutamine was initiated at a dose of 10 μg/kg/min and increased at 3-minute intervals to 20, 30, and up to a maximum of 40 μg/kg/min. Per our lab protocol, atropine is injected (observing standard precautions and contraindications at 0.2 mg dose increments every minute, up to a total dose of 2 mg) if ≥ 85% age-predicted maximum heart rate or an absolute heart rate of ≥ 100 had not been reached after a 3-minute infusion of dobutamine at 20 μg/kg/min). The test was terminated at the completion of the protocol or with the development of significant ischemic ST-segment shifts, intolerable symptoms, ventricular tachycardia, symptomatic hypotension (or systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg), or severe hypertension (> 220/110 mmHg). A NDSE was defined as having a normal contractile response with dobutamine regardless of resting wall-motion abnormalities. Visual assessment of wall motion was performed using the following format: normal, mildly hypokinetic, severely hypokinetic, akinetic, and dyskinetic. The ASE standard 16-segment model, which was the recommended model by the ASE at the time of this study conception, was used for reporting of wall motion. Analysis was primarily done by visual assessment of wall motion. Ejection fraction estimation was based on visual assessment and an ejection fraction ≥ 50% was defined as normal. The decision to withhold beta-blockers and other anti-anginals was left to the discretion of the referring physician.

Electrocardiograms were designated as ischemic with the presence of ≥ 1 mm of horizontal or downsloping ST-segments 80 ms after the J-point, or if there was ≥ 1 mm ST-segment elevation in leads without significant Q-waves at baseline. Patients with a positive stress ECG but normal peak wall motion were considered to have negative DSE and were part of the study group.

Endpoints and Definitions

Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) assessed individually and as a composite were nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac death, and revascularization. Patients were also followed up for softer endpoints such as unstable angina. The hard MACE composite of nonfatal MI and cardiac death was also assessed. A follow-up period of 36 months was used when plotting survival curves. MI was defined by creatine kinase elevation > 2 times the upper limit of normal, or troponin elevation above the upper limits of normal for our lab assay in the setting of chest pain, or other clinical signs/symptoms suggesting cardiac ischemia. Cardiac death was documented as death related to MI (ST-elevation MI or non-ST-elevation MI), congestive heart failure, sudden cardiac death or arrhythmias. Revascularization included any percutaneous intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting. Unstable angina was defined as an accelerated pattern of chest pain with increased frequency, longer anginal duration, and decreased response to medical therapy, occurrence at rest or new onset chest pain.

Statistical analyses

A descriptive analysis was performed comparing clinical, demographic, and echocardiography variables between AA and CA patients. Student's t test for continuous variables and chi square analysis for categorical variables were used. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to create freedom-from-event survival curves for individual major clinical outcomes (non-fatal MI, cardiac death, revascularization, and any cardiac event). The log-rank test was used for comparing the survival curves between the 2 groups.

The Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to evaluate clinical, demographic, and stress echocardiography variables as predictors of hard MACE (cardiac death/non-fatal MI). Sub- group analysis was performed excluding those patients who failed to achieve a PMHR of ≥ 85%. The covariates included age, male gender, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, previous history of CAD/MI/revascularization, history of heart failure, hypercholesterolemia, tobacco use, chest pain, b-blocker/ca-channel blocker, LVH, EF, and PMHR ≥ 85%. From the multivariable modeling, adjusted hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated along with p-values. All statistical analysis was performed using the SAS software (version 9.1.3). P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Patient demographic and clinical characteristics

The study group with negative DSE comprised 727 patients of whom 387 were AA, and 340 CA. Mean overall follow-up was 39 ± 18 months. AA patients were younger (69.4 ± 12.6 years vs. 74.2 ± 10.7 years, p < .001), had higher rates of diabetes mellitus (37% vs. 29%, p = .01), and hypertension (91% vs. 85%, p = .006) at baseline compared to CA patients (Table 1). CA patients were more likely to have history of CAD (27% vs. 34%, p = 0.05), hypercholesterolemia (55% vs. 47%, p = 0.03) and prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (11% vs. 7%, p = .04) compared to AA patients.
Table 1

Patient characteristics

 

African-American (N = 387)

Caucasian (N = 340)

p value

Age (years)

69.0 ± 12.6

74.2 ± 10.7

< 0.001*

Male

148/387 (38%)

151/340 (44%)

0.092

Diabetes

143/387 (37%)

97/340 (29%)

0.016*

CAD

104/387 (27%)

114/340 (34%)

0.051

History of CHF

76/387 (20%)

57/340 (17%)

0.317

Hypertension

354/387 (91%)

289/340 (85%)

0.006*

Hypercholesterolemia

183/387 (47%)

188/340 (55%)

0.031*

Tobacco use

80/387 (21%)

103/340 (30%)

0.003*

Prior MI

82/387 (21%)

76/340 (22%)

0.704

Prior PCI

39/387 (10%)

45/340 (13%)

0.184

Prior CABG

28/387 (7%)

39/340 (11%)

0.049*

Chest pain

35/387 (9%)

24/340 (7%)

0.328

B-blocker/CC-blocker

189/387 (49%)

163/340 (48%)

0.809

*Statistically significant; B = beta; CABG = coronary artery bypass grafting; CAD = coronary arterial disease; CC = calcium channel; CHF = chronic heart failure; MI = myocardial infarction; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention

Dobutamine stress echocardiography characteristics

AA patients were more likely to have a hypertensive response (17% vs. 4%, p < .001) compared to CA patients (Table 2) and less likely to achieve a target heart rate (50% vs. 61%, p = 0.002) despite comparable beta-blocker/calcium-channel blocker usage (49% vs. 48%, p = 0.8). While both groups had similar rates of preserved systolic function (ejection fraction ≥ 50%) at baseline (81% vs. 82%, p = 0.8), AA's had significantly higher rates of echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (defined as M-mode measured septal and posterior wall end-diastolic thickness ≥ 11 mm: 70% vs. 49%, p < .001).
Table 2

Echocardiography variables

 

African American

Caucasian

P value

Hypotensive response

99/387 (26%)

129/337 (38%)

< 0.001*

SBP ≥ 200 and DBP ≥ 90

12/381 (3%)

2/333 (1%)

0.014*

SBP ≥ 200 or DBP ≥ 90

64/381 (17%)

13/333 (4%)

< 0.001*

LVH

271/387 (70%)

168/340 (49%)

< .001*

Ischemic ECG Change

16/385 (4%)

17/337 (5%)

0.568

Baseline WMA

86/385 (22%)

89/338 (26%)

0.211

EF ≥ 50%

314/387 (81%)

277/339 (82%)

0.843

PMHR ≤ 85%

192/386 (50%)

132/338 (39%)

0.002*

*Statistically significant; DBP = diastolic blood pressure; ECG = electrocardiogram; EF = ejection fraction; LVH = left ventricular hypertrophy; PMHR = predicted maximal heart rate; SBP = systolic blood pressure; WMA = wall motion abnormalities

Three-year cardiac event-free survival analysis

Kaplan-Meier freedom-from-events analysis showed that AA patients had a lower freedom from nonfatal MI (92% vs. 96%, p = 0.006), and any cardiac event (cardiac death/MI) (91% vs. 95%, p = .005) compared to CA patients (Figures 1 and 2). Freedom from unstable angina also trended lower in AA patients compared to CA patients (86% vs. 89%, p =. 08). There was no significant difference in the rates of event-free freedom from cardiac death (97% vs. 98%, p = .7), and revascularization (94% vs. 96%, p = .5) (Figures 3 and 4). At three years, rates of cardiac death were similar between both the groups (CA – 0.7% [5/727]; AA – 0.9% [7/727]), whereas rates of nonfatal MI's were higher in AA's (CA – 2% [15/727]; AA – 5% [37/727]). Patients from both ethnic cohorts were further analyzed for hard MACE (cardiac death/non-fatal M.I) based on the presence or absence of beta-blocker therapy and no differences were observed (Figures 5 and 6).
Figure 1

Kaplan- Meier curves for freedom from non-fatal MI compared by patient race in negative DSE patients (log rank p-value = 0.006). DSE- Dobutamine stress echocardiography, MI-Myocardial Infarction.

Figure 2

Kaplan- Meier curves for freedom from any cardiac event (cardiac death, MI) compared by patient race in negative DSE patients (log rank p-value = 0.005). DSE- Dobutamine stress echocardiography, MI-Myocardial Infarction.

Figure 3

Kaplan- Meier curves for freedom from cardiac death compared by patient race in negative DSE patients (log rank p-value = 0.730). DSE- Dobutamine stress echocardiography.

Figure 4

Kaplan- Meier curves for freedom from revascularization compared by patient race in negative DSE patients (log rank p-value = 0.578). DSE- Dobutamine stress echocardiography.

Figure 5

Kaplan- Meier curves for freedom from cardiac death compared by presence of absence of beta-blocker therapy in the entire patient cohort post negative DSE (log rank p-value = 0.759). DSE- Dobutamine stress echocardiography.

Figure 6

Kaplan- Meier curves for freedom from non-fatal M.I compared by presence of absence of beta-blocker therapy in the entire patient cohort post negative DSE (log rank p-value = 0.135). DSE- Dobutamine stress echocardiography.

Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis

Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the ability of race to predict the hard MACE presence of cardiac death/nonfatal-MI after accounting for study covariates (Table 3). AA ethnicity carried a 2.83-fold higher risk for cardiac death or non-fatal MI compared to CA patients. The other significant predictor was older age (1.03-fold higher per year). Sub-group analysis performed in patients with a NDSE and PMHR ≥ 85% again demonstrated that AA race still was a significant (3.23-fold higher) predictor of cardiac death/nonfatal-MI after accounting for similar clinical and stress variables as listed above (Table 4).
Table 3

Risk-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression analysis for predicting cardiac death/M.I in African-American and Caucasian patients with NDSE

 

Hazard Ratio

95% CL

P-value

Race (African-American)

2.878

1.608 – 5.151

<0.001 *

Age in Years

1.031

1.007 – 1.056

0.011 *

Male

1.392

0.816 – 2.375

0.225

Diabetes

1.522

0.900 – 2.576

0.117

CAD/Prior MI/Prior Revascularization

1.537

0.861 – 2.746

0.146

History of CHF

1.098

0.567 – 2.127

0.781

Hypertension

1.002

0.345 – 2.910

0.997

Hypercholesterolemia

1.002

0.587 – 1.710

0.994

Tobacco Use

1.677

0.954 – 2.948

0.072

Chest Pain

1.587

0.739 – 3.407

0.236

B-Blocker/CC-Blocker

1.164

0.674 – 2.010

0.586

LVH

0.756

0.444 – 1.285

0.301

EF in Percent

0.978

0.955 – 1.002

0.071

PMHR ≥ 85%

1.344

0.788 – 2.292

0.278

*Statistically significant; CAD = coronary arterial disease; CHF = chronic heart failure; CL = confidence limits; EF = ejection fraction; LVH = left ventricular hypertrophy; MI = myocardial infarction; PMHR = predicted maximal heart rate; NDSE = Negative Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography

Table 4

Risk-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression analysis for predicting cardiac death/M.I in African-American and Caucasian patients with PMHR ≥ 85% and NDSE

 

Hazard Ratio

95% CL

P-value

Race (African-American)

3.234

1.579 – 6.622

0.001 *

Age in Years

1.049

1.012 – 1.086

0.009 *

Male

1.294

0.641 – 2.610

0.472

Diabetes

0.916

0.426 – 1.968

0.822

CAD/Prior MI/Prior Revascularization

2.607

1.205 – 5.639

0.015 *

History of CHF

1.101

0.461 – 2.633

0.828

Hypertension

1.059

0.301 – 3.729

0.929

Hypercholesterolemia

0.811

0.393 – 1.674

0.571

Tobacco Use

1.616

0.760 – 3.435

0.213

Chest Pain

2.457

0.991 – 6.088

0.052

B-Blocker/CC-Blocker

1.153

0.572 – 2.326

0.691

LVH

0.590

0.290 – 1.200

0.145

EF in Percent

0.977

0.945 – 1.011

0.182

*Statistically significant; CAD = coronary arterial disease; CHF = chronic heart failure; CL = confidence limits; EF = ejection fraction; LVH = left ventricular hypertrophy; MI = myocardial infarction; PMHR = predicted maximal heart rate; NDSE = Negative Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography

Discussion

This is the first study to our knowledge to directly compare long-term MACE between AA and CA patients with a NDSE in an unselected patient population. Our study found that AA patients were more likely to suffer from non-fatal MI and any MACE compared to CA patients, despite a NDSE. In multivariate analysis, AA's were twice more likely to suffer from any cardiac event compared to CA patients after controlling for clinical and echocardiographic variables.

Baseline patient characteristics in our study are consistent with many prior studies showing that AA's tend to be younger, with a greater female preponderance, and have higher rates of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and left ventricular hypertrophy, but lower rates of CAD compared to CA counterparts[22, 23]. A low comparable cardiac death rate in both groups is also consistent with prior literature, demonstrating a low incidence of cardiac death in patients with a NDSE [24].

Race and dobutamine stress echocardiography

In our study, AA patients had higher incidences of diabetes mellitus and hypertension, and concomitantly higher rates of left ventricular hypertrophy. Also, despite comparable rates of similar systolic function in both groups and lower rates of ischemic disease in AA's, these patients had worse outcomes. This is consistent with prior reports that cardiovascular mortality in AA's is more likely to result from hypertension, obesity, and diabetes mellitus, leading to increased micro-vascular disease and overall mortality rather than from CAD leading to pump failure [25, 26]. Also, prior 2D echocardiography studies focusing on left ventricular hypertrophy [27] have shown that AA's are more likely to have more cardiac events despite a preserved left ventricular function [22]. While the overall incidence of cardiac death was low and similar in both groups (CA: 0.7% [5/727]; AA: 0.9% [7/727]), AA patients accounted for a significantly higher percentage of nonfatal MI's (CA: 2% [15/727]; AA: 5% [37/727]) in this study.

What could account for this? It is well known that stress echocardiographic (exercise or pharmacologic) techniques have greater specificity (with relatively lesser sensitivity) than stress nuclear techniques for epicardial CAD detection. This is at least partly related to the need for true ischemia and wall motion abnormalities for CAD detection by stress echo caused by hemodynamically significant stenosis rather than heterogeneity of flow in nuclear imaging, which may happen even in absence of significant CAD. Thus dobutamine stress echocardiography could underestimate disease in patients with mild to moderate non-obstructive CAD due to lack of ischemia and this may be confounded further by chronotropic incompetence in presence or absence of beta- blockers. Also test sensitivity can be reduced if patients are tested on anti-anginal therapy. Higher rates of nonfatal MI and unstable angina in AA patients in setting of a NDSE could imply that this group may have underlying active atherosclerosis/endothelial dysfunction, which is underappreciated by current dobutamine stress echocardiographic techniques that rely on wall-motion abnormalities to detect ischemia. Prior literature has demonstrated that AA patients have a 33% excess prevalence of hypertension and a 50% excess prevalence of diabetes [28, 29], both of which are known risk factors for CAD and are associated with abnormal coronary and microvascular relaxation [3034]. It has also been shown that when left ventricular hypertrophy and chronic hypertension are present together they seem to be the most important predictors for abnormal vasomotor reactivity to endothelium dependent/independent stimulus both in AA's and CA's, while normotensive patients (both AA and CA) show no such differences in response to coronary vasomotor stimulation [3034]. This carries significance as shown in our study as not only is diabetes mellitus more prevalent in AA (Table 1), but also it has been shown that diabetics especially with CAD carry an increased cardiovascular risk and carry a less benign prognosis despite a NDSE [35]. As further suggested by Cortigiani et al, this high-risk cohort of patients should be evaluated by other non-invasive measures such coronary flow-reserve assessment by transthoracic stress echocardiography [36] for better risk stratification. Extrapolating on this is the interesting question of whether assessment of flow reserve abnormalities at peak dobutamine infusion in AA with NDSE could potentially identify the higher risk subgroup. This needs further study.

Based on the much higher prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, abnormal BP response and LVH, AA patients likely have a greater predilection for acquired coronary and microvascular dysfunction explaining higher non-fatal MI and any overall MACE as seen in our study. Existing echocardiographic stress testing modalities currently do not have the robustness of identifying sub clinical atherosclerosis and endothelial dysfunction. Myocardial perfusion contrast echocardiography holds this promise but is not routinely still incorporated in clinical practice. Nuclear stress imaging techniques such as SPECT relative perfusion analysis and positron emission tomography with absolute blood flow quantization could identify flow reserve abnormalities. In clinical practice dobutamine echocardiography remains robust to exclude major epicardial disease but cannot rule out non-obstructive atherosclerosis or endothelial dysfunction both of which can influence cardiac outcomes.

Despite higher rates of non-fatal MI and total MACE the entire patient group in our study had low cardiac death rates over 3 years, regardless of race. This likely reflects the characteristics of our study group where there was high prevalence of normal EF (EF being a major determinant of cardiac death). Our group has previously shown that a normal contractile response in setting of preserved EF is associated with a low cardiac death rate over a 3 year follow-up period regardless of heart rates achieved with a NDSE [37].

Race and target heart rate achievement

It could also be argued that under recognition of CAD in our study group particularly in AA's could explain higher subsequent event rates. Only 50% of AA's compared to 61% CA patients achieved PMHR ≥ 85%, (p = .002), despite comparable high rates of atrioventricular nodal blocker use at the time of DSE (49% vs. 48%, p non significant) in our study. Nevertheless our study sub- target heart rate percentages are comparable to prior studies, which have been reported in upto 60%, in patients undergoing DSE [3840]. Sub-group analysis of patients on and without beta-blocker therapy showed higher overall MACE despite a NDSE (87% vs. 93%, p = 0.002) but the event rate was primarily driven by higher rates of unstable angina (93% vs. 78%, p < 0.001) and re-vascularization (97% vs. 93%, p = 0.001), whereas rates of cardiac death (98% vs. 99%, p = .759) and non-fatal M.I (94% vs. 93%, p = .135) did not differ (Figures 5 and 6). These results were consistent across both ethnic patient cohorts. This likely reflects the influence of beta-blockers on potentially causing under recognition of CAD due to lack of heart rate response or reduced ischemia detection due to anti ischemic effect. Thus patients tend to present back with angina and undergo coronary angiography and revascularization.

One study specifically assessing racial differences in heart rate and blood pressure response to dobutamine, reported a 47% incidence of submaximal heart rate response despite holding beta-blockers prior to DSE [41]. That study also showed that compared to CA's, AA patients (primarily male gender) had a higher elevated baseline blood pressure and hence an increased hypertensive response, which likely lead to higher, rates of premature termination of a DSE and accounting for higher rates of submaximal tests. As shown in Tables 1 and 2, these findings are replicated in our study demonstrating higher baseline blood pressures, more LVH and higher DSE induced blood pressure responses in AA's compared to CA patients. Pharmacogenetic studies in AA's show a varied hemodynamic response to some vasodilators, leading to altered vasoreactivity [42, 43]. Further pharmacological and clinical studies are warranted in this area, specifically evaluating the response to dobutamine in AA patients and whether specific beta receptor responsiveness or pharmacokinetic differences may mediate such responses.

Given the high rates of submaximal NDSE in our AA which could potentially influence cardiac event rates, we performed a sub-group analysis including only AA and CA patients who achieved a PMHR ≥ 85% from the study population. Consistent with overall results, as shown in Table 4, AA ethnicity continued to be the single most important predictor of any cardiac event carrying a 3.2-fold risk, with age (1.04-fold higher per year). and history of CAD (2.6-fold higher) being the other significant predictors.

Strengths and limitations

The primary strengths of this study are the large number of AA patients (387/727, 50%), the long-term follow-up (3 years) and the real world implications of patients being tested on AV nodal blocking agents. The weaknesses are those inherent in retrospective analyses, which can include documentation inaccuracies and incomplete follow-up. Furthermore AA had more co-morbidities than CA, which can drive outcomes although we attempted to account for these factors in the multivariate analysis. In addition, the results of this study cannot be extrapolated to outcomes of NDSE if patients are tested in absence of beta-blockers or calcium-channel blockers.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates that despite a NDSE, AA patients have a significant higher incidence of nonfatal MI and overall MACE compared to CA patients at 3 years, and AA ethnicity carries a greater than 2-fold increased risk for any cardiac event. Also, our study shows that AA and CA patients are two very heterogeneous groups, when compared both by cardiovascular risk factors and stress echocardiography variables. Interesting possibilities of fundamental racial differences in responsiveness to dobutamine is again raised in our study as in prior studies [41]. This requires further investigations focusing on pharmacogenetics of response to dobutamine in AA and CA's. Physicians should be aware that although NDSE overall is associated with low cardiac event rates, AA's have higher rates of nonfatal MI and MACE compared to CA patients. Further, due to the higher prevalence of risk factors such hypertension and diabetes mellitus in this ethnic group, these patients should be monitored closely and aggressive preventive and treatment strategies be employed to help reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Abbreviations

CAD: 

Coronary artery disease

AA: 

African American

CA: 

Caucasian

DSE: 

Dobutamine stress echocardiography

NDSE: 

Negative dobutamine stress echocardiography

ASE: 

American Society of Echocardiography

ECG: 

Electrocardiogram

MACE: 

Major adverse cardiac events

MI: 

Myocardial infarction

EF: 

Ejection Fraction

WMA: 

Wall motion abnormalities

PMHR: 

Predicted maximum heart rate

LVH: 

Left ventricular hypertrophy

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This research work was presented at the American Society of Echocardiography Scientific Sessions, June 2007.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Heart and Vascular Institute, Henry Ford Hospital
(2)
Department of Biostatistics & Research Epidemiology, Henry Ford Hospital

References

  1. Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, Bridges CR, Califf RM, Casey DE, Chavey WE, Fesmire FM, Hochman JS, Levin TN, Lincoff AM, Peterson ED, Theroux P, Wenger NK, Wright RS, Smith SC, Jacobs AK, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Antman EM, Halperin JL, Hunt SA, Krumholz HM, Kushner FG, Lytle BW, Nishimura R, Ornato JP, Page RL, Riegel B: ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-Elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007, 50 (7): e1-e157.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Goldstein LB, Adams R, Alberts MJ, Appel LJ, Brass LM, Bushnell CD, Culebras A, DeGraba TJ, Gorelick PB, Guyton JR, Hart RG, Howard G, Kelly-Hayes M, Nixon JV, Sacco RL: Primary prevention of ischemic stroke: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council: cosponsored by the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Interdisciplinary Working Group; Cardiovascular Nursing Council; Clinical Cardiology Council; Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism Council; and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group. Circulation. 2006, 113 (24): e873-923.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Clark LT, Ferdinand KC, Flack JM, Gavin JR, Hall WD, Kumanyika SK, Reed JW, Saunders E, Valantine HA, Watson K, Wenger NK, Wright JT: Coronary heart disease in African Americans. Heart Dis. 2001, 3 (2): 97-108.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lillie-Blanton M, Maddox TM, Rushing O, Mensah GA: Disparities in cardiac care: rising to the challenge of Healthy People 2010. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004, 44 (3): 503-508.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cooper R, Cutler J, Desvigne-Nickens P, Fortmann SP, Friedman L, Havlik R, Hogelin G, Marler J, McGovern P, Morosco G, Mosca L, Pearson T, Stamler J, Stryer D, Thom T: Trends and disparities in coronary heart disease, stroke, and other cardiovascular diseases in the United States: findings of the national conference on cardiovascular disease prevention. Circulation. 2000, 102 (25): 3137-3147.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Mensah GA, Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Greenlund KJ, Croft JB: State of disparities in cardiovascular health in the United States. Circulation. 2005, 111 (10): 1233-1241.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Orakzai SH, Orakzai RH, Nasir K, Santos RD, Edmundowicz D, Budoff MJ, Blumenthal RS: Subclinical coronary atherosclerosis: racial profiling is necessary!. Am Heart J. 2006, 152 (5): 819-827.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferdinand KC: Coronary artery disease in minority racial and ethnic groups in the United States. Am J Cardiol. 2006, 97 (2A): 12A-19A.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferguson JA, Tierney WM, Westmoreland GR, Mamlin LA, Segar DS, Eckert GJ, Zhou XH, Martin DK, Weinberger M: Examination of racial differences in management of cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997, 30 (7): 1707-1713.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ford E, Newman J, Deosaransingh K: Racial and ethnic differences in the use of cardiovascular procedures: findings from the California Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. Am J Public Health. 2000, 90 (7): 1128-1134.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Gillum RF, Mussolino ME, Madans JH: Coronary heart disease incidence and survival in African-American women and men. The NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study. Ann Intern Med. 1997, 127 (2): 111-118.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kurian AK, Cardarelli KM: Racial and ethnic differences in cardiovascular disease risk factors: a systematic review. Ethn Dis. 2007, 17 (1): 143-152.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Philbin EF, Weil HF, Francis CA, Marx HJ, Jenkins PL, Pearson TA, Reed RG: Race-related differences among patients with left ventricular dysfunction: observations from a biracial angiographic cohort. Harlem-Bassett LP(A) Investigators. J Card Fail. 2000, 6 (3): 187-193.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Young BA, Maynard C, Boyko EJ: Racial differences in diabetic nephropathy, cardiovascular disease, and mortality in a national population of veterans. Diabetes Care. 2003, 26 (8): 2392-2399.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Whittle J, Kressin NR, Peterson ED, Orner MB, Glickman M, Mazzella M, Petersen LA: Racial differences in prevalence of coronary obstructions among men with positive nuclear imaging studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006, 47 (10): 2034-2041.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Topol EJ, Nissen SE: Our preoccupation with coronary luminology. The dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease. Circulation. 1995, 92 (8): 2333-2342.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Poldermans D, Fioretti PM, Boersma E, Bax JJ, Thomson IR, Roelandt JR, Simoons ML: Long-term prognostic value of dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography in 1737 patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: A single-center experience. Circulation. 1999, 99 (6): 757-762.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Krivokapich J, Child JS, Walter DO, Garfinkel A: Prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography in predicting cardiac events in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999, 33 (3): 708-716.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Dhond MR, Donnell K, Singh S, Garapati S, Whitley TB, Nguyen T, Bommer W: Value of negative dobutamine stress echocardiography in predicting long-term cardiac events. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1999, 12 (6): 471-475.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Elhendy A, Schinkel AF, Bax JJ, Van Domburg RT, Poldermans D: Prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with normal left ventricular systolic function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004, 17 (7): 739-743.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Metz LD, Beattie M, Hom R, Redberg RF, Grady D, Fleischmann KE: The prognostic value of normal exercise myocardial perfusion imaging and exercise echocardiography: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007, 49 (2): 227-237.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. East MA, Peterson ED, Shaw LK, Gattis WA, O'Connor CM: Racial differences in the outcomes of patients with diastolic heart failure. Am Heart J. 2004, 148 (1): 151-156.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Okin PM, Wright JT, Nieminen MS, Jern S, Taylor AL, Phillips R, Papademetriou V, Clark LT, Ofili EO, Randall OS, Oikarinen L, Viitasalo M, Toivonen L, Julius S, Dahlof B, Devereux RB: Ethnic differences in electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy: the LIFE study. Losartan Intervention For Endpoint. Am J Hypertens. 2002, 15 (8): 663-671.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Sozzi FB, Elhendy A, Roelandt JR, van Domburg RT, Schinkel AF, Vourvouri EC, Bax JJ, Rizzello V, Poldermans D: Long-term prognosis after normal dobutamine stress echocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 2003, 92 (11): 1267-1270.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Maynard C, Fisher LD, Passamani ER, Pullum T: Blacks in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study: risk factors and coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1986, 74 (1): 64-71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Otten MW, Teutsch SM, Williamson DF, Marks JS: The effect of known risk factors on the excess mortality of black adults in the United States. Jama. 1990, 263 (6): 845-850.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. East MA, Jollis JG, Nelson CL, Marks D, Peterson ED: The influence of left ventricular hypertrophy on survival in patients with coronary artery disease: do race and gender matter?. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003, 41 (6): 949-954.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Zeiher AM, Krause T, Schachinger V, Minners J, Moser E: Impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation of coronary resistance vessels is associated with exercise-induced myocardial ischemia. Circulation. 1995, 91 (9): 2345-2352.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Chilian WM: Coronary microcirculation in health and disease. Summary of an NHLBI workshop. Circulation. 1997, 95 (2): 522-528.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Freedman DS, Gruchow HW, Manley JC, Anderson AJ, Sobocinski KA, Barboriak JJ: Black/white differences in risk factors for arteriographically documented coronary artery disease in men. Am J Cardiol. 1988, 62 (4): 214-219.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Gordon JB, Ganz P, Nabel EG, Fish RD, Zebede J, Mudge GH, Alexander RW, Selwyn AP: Atherosclerosis influences the vasomotor response of epicardial coronary arteries to exercise. J Clin Invest. 1989, 83 (6): 1946-1952.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Quillen JE, Rossen JD, Oskarsson HJ, Minor RL, Lopez AG, Winniford MD: Acute effect of cigarette smoking on the coronary circulation: constriction of epicardial and resistance vessels. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993, 22 (3): 642-647.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Stone PH, Thompson B, Anderson HV, Kronenberg MW, Gibson RS, Rogers WJ, Diver DJ, Theroux P, Warnica JW, Nasmith JB, Kells C, Kleiman N, McCabe CH, Schactman M, Knatterud GL, Braunwald E: Influence of race, sex, and age on management of unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction: The TIMI III registry. Jama. 1996, 275 (14): 1104-1112.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Vita JA, Treasure CB, Yeung AC, Vekshtein VI, Fantasia GM, Fish RD, Ganz P, Selwyn AP: Patients with evidence of coronary endothelial dysfunction as assessed by acetylcholine infusion demonstrate marked increase in sensitivity to constrictor effects of catecholamines. Circulation. 1992, 85 (4): 1390-1397.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Cortigiani L, Bigi R, Sicari R, Landi P, Bovenzi F, Picano E: Prognostic value of pharmacological stress echocardiography in diabetic and nondiabetic patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006, 47 (3): 605-610.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Cortigiani L, Rigo F, Gherardi S, Sicari R, Galderisi M, Bovenzi F, Picano E: Additional prognostic value of coronary flow reserve in diabetic and nondiabetic patients with negative dipyridamole stress echocardiography by wall motion criteria. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007, 50 (14): 1354-1361.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Patel S, Srivastava A, Lingam N, Jacobsen G, Ananthasubramaniam K: Favorable Prognostic Value of Submaximal Negative Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography in Patients with Preserved Ejection Fraction. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2006, 19 (5):1354:1361Google Scholar
  38. Chenzbraun A, Potekhin M, Dreyfuss M, Alper-Gendelman T, Kott F, Keren A: Variability of inotropic and chronotropic response during dobutamine stress echocardiography and possible implications for diagnostic accuracy. Am J Cardiol. 2003, 92 (12): 1451-1454.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. McNeill AJ, Fioretti PM, el-Said SM, Salustri A, Forster T, Roelandt JR: Enhanced sensitivity for detection of coronary artery disease by addition of atropine to dobutamine stress echocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 1992, 70 (1): 41-46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Daly AL, Linares OA, Smith MJ, Starling MR, Supiano MA: Dobutamine pharmacokinetics during dobutamine stress echocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 1997, 79 (10): 1381-1386.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Aquilante CL, Humma LM, Yarandi HN, Andrisin TE, Lewis JF, Hamilton KK, Johnson JA: Influence of gender and race on hemodynamic response to dobutamine during dobutamine stress echocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 2004, 94 (4): 535-538.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Bassett DR, Duey WJ, Walker AJ, Howley ET, Bond V: Racial differences in maximal vasodilatory capacity of forearm resistance vessels in normotensive young adults. Am J Hypertens. 1992, 5 (11): 781-786.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Houghton JL, Strogatz DS, Torosoff MT, Smith VE, Fein SA, Kuhner PA, Philbin EF, Carr AA: African Americans with LVH demonstrate depressed sensitivity of the coronary microcirculation to stimulated relaxation. Hypertension. 2003, 42 (3): 269-276.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Srivastava et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement