Assessment of left ventricular volumes and primary mitral regurgitation severity by 2D echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Table 2 Comparison of 2D TTE and CMR measurements of LV dimensions and MR severity

	2D TTE	CMR		Pearson correlation
LVEDD (mm)	53 ± 6	53 ± 8	p = 0.9	r = 0.80	p < 0.00001
LVESD (mm)	36 ± 5	36 ± 6	p = 1	r = 0.85	p < 0.00001
LVEF (%) teichholz	64 ± 8	61 ± 7	p = 0.05	r = 0.26	p = 0.1
LVEDV (ml)	136 ± 52	164 ± 70	p = 0.0003	r = 0.81	p < 0.00001
LVESV (ml)	44 ± 16	65 ± 31	p < 0.00001	r = 0.7	p < 0.00001
LVSV (ml)	90 ± 39	99 ± 46	p = 0.06	r = 0.75	p < 0.00001
LVEF (%) simpson	67 ± 5	61 ± 7	p = 0.0004	r = 0.27	p = 0.1
ERO/ARO (mm ² )	48 ± 25	42 ± 17	p = 0.1	r = 0.76	p < 0.0001
RVol (ml) pisa	69 ± 38	39 ± 27	p = 0.001	r = 0.38	p = 0.07
RVol (ml) doppler volumetric method	67 ± 33	28 ± 16	p = 0.003	r = -0.15	p = 0.6

MR = mitral regurgitation; LVEDD = left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; LVESD = left ventricular end-systolic volume; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; LVEDV = left ventricular end-diastolic volume; LVESV = left ventricular end-systolic volume; LVSV = left ventricular stroke volume; ERO = effective regurgitant orifice; ARO = anatomical regurgitant orifice; RVol = regurgitant volume.

ISSN: 1476-7120