Skip to main content

Table 2 Differences of Parameters between Two Groups

From: Quantitative assessment of harmonic power doppler myocardial perfusion imaging with intravenous levovist™ in patients with myocardial infarction: comparison with myocardial viability evaluated by coronary flow reserve and coronary flow pattern of infarct-related artery

 

Group A

Group B

PIR at rest

0.668 ± 0.178

0.248 ± 0.015#

PIR at ATP stress

0.725 ± 0.194

0.295 ± 0.107#

EDV in the acute phase (ml)

112 ± 33

146 ± 38

EDV at follow-up (ml)

114 ± 30

192 ± 39*

EF in the acute phase (%)

50 ± 7

45 ± 9

EF at follow-up (%)

52 ± 7

39 ± 9*

LVWMI in the acute phase

2.1 ± 0.7

2.4 ± 0.3

LVWMI at follow-up

1.7 ± 0.4

2.4 ± 0.3*

Peak creatine kinase (U/L)

2734 ± 868

6198 ± 2265*

   CFR

2.60 ± 0.8

1.31 ± 0.29*

  1. #p < 0.05, *p < 0.01
  2. PIR, peak intensity ratio; EDV, end-diastolic volume; EF, ejection fraction; CFR, coronary blood flow reserve; LVWMI, left ventricular wall motion index