Skip to main content

Table 2 CMR/US methods comparison by Passing & Badlock regression analysis, paired samples t-tests and Bland & Altman (BA) plot.

From: Comparison of echocardiographic (US) volumetry with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in transfusion dependent thalassemia major (TM)

CMR – US

EDv (ml)

ESv (ml)

Sv (ml)

EF (%)

EF – SF (%)

Mean diff ± SD

11.22 ± 26.03

2.80 ± 12.41

8.25 ± 19.79

0.59 ± 6.60

-

p (t-test)

0.0003

0.0514 (NS)

0.0005

0.3684 (NS)

-

r (p < 0.0001)

0.8135

0.8081

0.7763

0.5990

0.5771

BA limits

-39.8 to 62.2

-21.5 to 27.1

-30.5 to 47.0

-12.3 to 13.5

-

BA range

102.0

48.6

79.7

25.8

-

Back to article page

Cardiovascular Ultrasound

ISSN: 1476-7120

Contact us