Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of AUC

From: Two-dimensional speckle tracking for the assessment of coronary artery disease during dobutamine stress echo: clinical tool or merely research method

  AUC SE 95 % CI
GLSΔ 0,80 0,0711 0,615 to 0,859
ΤorsionΔ 0,76 0,0739 0,601 to 0,849
WMSIΔ 0,84 0,0618 0,668 to 0,896
Torsion and GLS combined 0,77 0,0737 0,619 to 0,862
GLSΔ vs WMSIΔ
Significance level P = 0,57
ΤorsionΔ vs WMSIΔ
Significance level P = 0,51
WMSIΔ vs Torsion and GLS combined
Significance level P = 0,59