Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of AUC

From: Two-dimensional speckle tracking for the assessment of coronary artery disease during dobutamine stress echo: clinical tool or merely research method

 

AUC

SE

95 % CI

GLSΔ

0,80

0,0711

0,615 to 0,859

ΤorsionΔ

0,76

0,0739

0,601 to 0,849

WMSIΔ

0,84

0,0618

0,668 to 0,896

Torsion and GLS combined

0,77

0,0737

0,619 to 0,862

GLSΔ vs WMSIΔ

Significance level

P = 0,57

ΤorsionΔ vs WMSIΔ

Significance level

P = 0,51

WMSIΔ vs Torsion and GLS combined

Significance level

P = 0,59