Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Quantification of the relative contribution of the different right ventricular wall motion components to right ventricular ejection fraction: the ReVISION method

  • Bálint Lakatos1,
  • Zoltán Tősér2,
  • Márton Tokodi1,
  • Alexandra Doronina1,
  • Annamária Kosztin1,
  • Denisa Muraru3,
  • Luigi P. Badano3,
  • Attila Kovács1Email authorView ORCID ID profile and
  • Béla Merkely1
Contributed equally
Cardiovascular Ultrasound201715:8

Received: 28 November 2016

Accepted: 15 March 2017

Published: 27 March 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
28 Nov 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
10 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Laura Stefani
15 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Piotr Lipiec
10 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Bálint Lakatos
Resubmission - Version 2
10 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
15 Mar 2017 Editorially accepted
27 Mar 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12947-017-0100-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

MTA-SE Cardiovascular Imaging Research Group, Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University
Department of Software Technology and Methodology, Eötvös Loránd University
Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padova