Equivocal tests after contrast stress-echocardiography compared with invasive coronary angiography or with CT angiography: CT calcium score in mildly positive tests may spare unnecessary coronary angiograms
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|11 Nov 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|4 Dec 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Piotr Lipiec|
|10 Dec 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Thomas Porter|
|11 Dec 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Nicola Gaibazzi|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|11 Dec 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Dec 2017||Editorially accepted|
|6 Feb 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12947-017-0119-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.