Skip to main content

Table 1 Patients overview

From: How I do it: feasibility of a new ultrasound probe fixator to facilitate high quality stress echocardiography

Subject Age Gender BMI Indication Stress test Echo view Quality baseline Quality mid exercise Quality max exercise Probefix feasible
Patient 1 76 male 29.3 gradient MV supine AP4CH good good good yes
Patient 2 80 male 26.7 gradient MV supine AP4CH good good n/a n/a
Patient 3 34 female 21.3 device optimization in CRT patient Supine AP4CH moderate moderate moderate yes
Patient 4 82 female 33.2 gradient AoV Supine AP5CH good good good yes
Patient 5 19 female 22.2 gradient AoV Supine AP5CH, AP3CH poor n/a n/a no
Patient 6 43 female 35.2 gradient MV Supine AP4CH good good good yes
Volunteer 1 58 male   quality check Upright AP4CH good good n/a yes
Volunteer 2 35 male 23.1 quality check Supine AP4CH good good good yes
Volunteer 3 28 male 20.5 quality check Supine PSAX/AP4CH poor n/a n/a no
Volunteer 4 27 male 23.5 quality check Supine AP4Ch moderate moderate moderate yes
Volunteer 5 28 male 24.9 quality check Supine AP4CH good good good yes
Volunteer 6 27 female 21.1 quality check Supine AP4CH good good good yes
  1. An overview of patients and volunteers that participated in the pilot study. Age, gender, body mass index (BMI), indication for stress test and feasibility of the Probefix is displayed. MV mitral valve, AoV aortic valve, AP3CH apical three chamber, AP4CH apical four chamber, AP5CH apical five chamber, PSAX parasternal short axis
Back to article page

Cardiovascular Ultrasound

ISSN: 1476-7120

Contact us