Skip to main content

Table 3 Method comparison of imaging modalities in the heart failure cohort

From: Evaluation of a commercial multi-dimensional echocardiography technique for ventricular volumetry in small animals

Method 1DE 2DE 3DE
  SHAM TAC SHAM TAC SHAM TAC
ESV, μl 33.15 ± 4.3 55.72 ± 7.6* 34.63 ± 4.4 58.4 ± 8.6* 26.95 ± 2.6 41.57 ± 3.7**
EDV, μl 70.01 ± 4.2 85.53 ± 5.5 65.24 ± 5.2 83.54 ± 6.8 48.84 ± 2.1 58.31 ± 3.2*
EF, % 53.85 ± 3.4 36.89 ± 4.8* 47.96 ± 3.0 32.4 ± 4.1* 45.29 ± 3.8 28.9 ± 4.1*
SV, μl 36.87 ± 1.0 29.8 ± 3.5 30.62 ± 1.6 25.2 ± 2.5 21.89 ± 1.6 16.7 ± 2.6
  1. Mean ± SEM. Student’s t-test. *p <.05. **p <.01. SHAM: n = 7, TAC: n = 9. EDV = end-diastolic volume; ESV = end-systolic volume; EF = ejection fraction; SV = stroke volume