Skip to main content

Table 3 Echocardiography characteristics

From: Comparison of mitral annulus geometry between patients with ischemic and non-ischemic functional mitral regurgitation: implications for transcatheter mitral valve implantation

 

Ischemic mitral regurgitation N = 41

Non ischemic mitral regurgitation N = 53

p

MR Vena contracta (mm)

7 (6–8)

7 (6–8)

0.658

MR PISA radius (mm)

7 (6–8)

8 (7–9)

0.138

MR EROA (mm2)

2 (2–3)

2.1(2–3)

0.421

MR R Vol (mL)

38 (28–58)

38.5 (29–47.7)

0.803

sPAP

47 (35–56)

44 (35–49)

0.211

TR severity

Trivial 6 (11.3%)

Trivial 6 (15.4%)

0.753

Mild 29 (54.7%)

Mild 20 (51.3%)

Moderate11 (20.8%)

Moderate10 (25.6%)

Severe 7 (13.2%)

Severe3 (7.7%)

AR severity

None 25 (49%)

None 25 (65%)

0.437

Trivial 13 (25%)

Trivial 6 (15%)

Mild 12 (23.5%)

Mild 9 (22.5%)

Moderate 1 (2%)

Moderate 0 (0%)

LV EDV (ml/m2)

134 (114–153)

143 (116–178)

0.078

LV ESV (mL/m2)

96 (68–109)

105 (78–135)

0.075

Ejection Fraction (%)

31 (26–38)

28 (22–32)

0.030

Indexed LA volume (mL/m2)

60 (51–68)

70 (53–91)

0.031

  1. Data are expressed as Median (25°-75°) or Number (%)
  2. Abbreviations: AR aortic regurgitation, EROA effective regurgitant orifice area, LA left atrial, LV EDV left ventricular end-diastolic volume, LV ESV left ventricular end-systolic volume, MR mitral regurgitation, PISA proximal isovelocity surface area, R Vol regurgitant volume, sPAP systolic pulmonary artery pressure, TR tricuspid regurgitation. Italicized values highlight statistically significant differences