Skip to main content

Table 5 Analyses to identify baseline predictors of response to CRT

From: The value of left ventricular strain–volume loops in predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

Variable

Univariate Analysis

Multivariate Analysis

OR

95% CI

P

OR

95% CI

P

Age

1.011

1.000–1.023

.054

   

Female

7.071

0.774–64.575

.083

   

QRS duration

1.004

0.976–1.032

.806

   

LBBB

1.417

0.310–6.470

.653

   

NYHA class III

1.800

0.380–8.535

.459

   

Nonischemic Etiology

1.633

0.383–6.968

.508

   

NT-proBNP

1.006

0.990–1.020

.340

   

hs CRP

1.001

1.000–1.070

.420

   

LVESD

1.009

0.998–1.020

.123

   

LVEDV

1.001

0.999–1.004

.330

   

LVEF

1.003

0.930–1.082

.939

   

GLS

0.892

0.809–0.984

.022

0.820

0.490–0.995

.190

GCS

0.922

0.852–0.997

.042

0.962

0.657–1.000

.660

TpPS-SD%

1.006

0.999–1.013

.112

   

Tmsv-SD%

1.007

1.002–1.015

.048

1.002

1.000–1.001

.120

SDI

0.978

0.958–0.999

.041

0.990

0.680–1.000

.240

MidLateral PSPeak

0.818

0.697–0.960

.014

0.890

0.550–0.980

.150

Slope of MidLateral PS- Global volume loop

3.934

2.863–6.444

.016

2.880

1.230–6.700

.470

R2-S/D coupling of MidSeptal PS-Global volume loop

0.803

0.760–0.880

.009

0.878

0.810–0.930

.028

Slope of MidLateral PS-MidLateral volume loop

2.035

1.104–3.750

.023

1.796

0.980–3.000

.200

  1. CI Confidence interval, GCS Global circumferential strain, GLS Global longitudinal strain, hs CRP High sensitive C-reactive protein, LVEDV Left ventricular end-diastolic volume, LVESD Left ventricular end-systolic diameter, NT-proBNP N-terminal of the prohormone brain natriuretic peptide, OR Odd ratio, PS Principal strain, SDI Strain delay index, Tmsv-SD% Standard deviation of time to minimum systolic volume corrected by R-R interval, TpPS-SD% Standard deviation of time to peak principal strain corrected by R-R interval