Skip to main content

Table 1 Validation studies for 3D strain

From: A review of current trends in three-dimensional analysis of left ventricular myocardial strain

Experimental studies

Author Year (Ref.#)

Vendor

Materials

Reference

3D regional LS

3D regional CS

3D regional RS

3D regional AS

 Seo 2009 [14]

Toshiba

Sheep

Sonomicrometry

r = 0.89

p < 0.001

r = 0.90

p < 0.001

r = 0.84

p < 0.001

NA

 Seo 2011 [15]

Toshiba

Sheep

Sonomicrometry

NA

NA

NA

r = 0.87

p < 0.001

Human studies

Author Year (Ref.#)

Vendor

Subjects

Reference

3D GLS

3D GCS

3D GRS

3D GAS

2D GLS

2D GCS

2D GRS

 Kleijn 2012 [16]

Toshiba

Volunteer

CMR tagging

NA

r = 0.80

p: NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

 Luis 2014 [17]

GE

Patient

2D LVEF

r = 0.74

p < 0.001

r = 0.89

p < 0.001

r = 0.86

p < 0.001

r = 0.87

p < 0.001

r = 0.86

p < 0.001

r = 0.82

p < 0.001

r = 0.67

p < 0.001

 Luis 2014 [17]

GE

Patient

3D LVEF

r = 0.75

p < 0.001

r = 0.89

p < 0.001

r = 0.87

p < 0.001

r = 0.88

p < 0.001

r = 0.86

p < 0.001

r = 0.84

p < 0.001

r = 0.64

p < 0.001

 Obokata 2016 [18]

TomTec

Patient

CMR feature tracking

r = 0.87

p < 0.001

r = 0.88

p < 0.001

r = 0.82

p < 0.001

NA

r = 0.83

p < 0.001

r = 0.90

p < 0.001

r = 0.69

p < 0.001

  1. AS area strain, CMR cardiac magnetic resonance, CS circumferential strain, GAS global area strain, GCS global circumferential strain, GLS global longitudinal strain, GRS global radial strain, LS longitudinal strain, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, NA not available, RS radial strain