Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristic parameters related to RV lead placement in patients understudy

From: Predictors of worsening TR severity after right ventricular lead placement: any added value by post-procedural fluoroscopy versus three –dimensional echocardiography?

 

Subgroup

Frequency (percent)

VC changes after lead placement

Lead placement type

ICD (single and dual chamber)

34 (66.6)

PPM (single and dual chamber)

5 (9.8)

CRT (CRT-D or CRT-P)

12 (23.5)

RV lead tip position

Apex

44 (86.2)

0.79 ± 1.11

septum

5 (9.8)

0.45 ± 0.81

Outflow tract

2 (3.9)

1.43 ± 2.26

RV lead curve

Large

33 (64.7)

0.99 ± 1.12

Medium

18 (35.3)

0.38 ± 1.14

RV lead relation to the tricuspid valve ring

Middle

29 (56.8)

0.61 ± 1.15

Low

21 (41.2)

1.02 ± 1.14

High

1 (1.9)

−2.00 ± 0.00

RV lead mobility state

Mid

33 (64.7)

0.62 ± 1.19

Low

12 (23.5)

0.91 ± 1.07

High

6 (11.7)

1.28 ± 0.68

Lead location in 3DECH

Central

22(37.3)

0.38 ± 1.03

Anterior leaflet

2 (3.4)

1.75 ± 0.35

posterior-septal Commissure

9 (15.3)

0.04 ± 0.25

Septal leaflet

8 (13.6)

1.40 ± 0.89

Posterior leaflet

5 (8.5)

2.55 ± 1.23

anterior-posterior Commissure

5 (8.5)

0.84 ± 0.83