Skip to main content

Table 3 Correlations observed in our study

From: Tissue Doppler derived biphasic velocities during the pre and post-ejection phases: patterns, concordance and hemodynamic significance in health and disease

 

HFpEF (n = 52)

HFrEF (n = 32)

Normal (n = 42)

Age matched Control (n = 26)

 

r

p

R

p

r

P

r

p

PREp (mean) vs. POEn (mean)

0.561

 < 0.001

0.421

0.018

0.521

 < 0.001

0.786

 < 0.001

PREn (mean) vs. POEp (mean)

0.425

0.005

0.611

 < 0.001

0.253

0.107

0.419

0.042

PREp/PREn (PRE-P/N) vs. POEn/POEp (POE-N/P)

0.292

0.036

0.896

 < 0.001

0.736

 < 0.001

0.483

0.019

Versus E/e’

PREp (mean), (cm/s)

0.513

 < 0.001

0.4

0.025

0.04

0.843

0.02

0.928

PREn (mean), (cm/s)

0.07

0.609

0.144

0.439

0.177

0.377

0.06

0.770

POEn (mean), (cm/s)

0.432

0.002

0.256

0.165

0.142

0.481

0.04

0.853

POEp (mean), (cm/s)

0.136

0.342

0.363

0.045

0.174

0.385

0.042

0.844

PREp/PREn (IC-P/N ratio)

0.55

 < 0.001

0.54

0.002

0.20

0.315

0.06

0.774

POEn/POEp (IR-N/P ratio)

0.3

0.034

0.45

0.012

0.225

0.259

0.05

0.800

Versus EF

PREp (mean), (cm/s)

0.068

0.631

0.413

0.021

0.022

0.888

0.253

0.211

PREn (mean), (cm/s)

0.075

0.596

0.189

0.308

0.232

0.139

0.172

0.400

POEn (mean), (cm/s)

0.169

0.230

0.290

0.113

0.085

0.59

0.366

0.07

POEp (mean), (cm/s)

0.084

0.552

0.173

0.353

0.211

0.180

0.202

0.323

PREp/PREn (IC-P/N ratio)

0.116

0.414

0.230

0.222

0.225

0.152

0.103

0.631

POEn/POEp (IR-N/P ratio)

0.045

0.750

0.036

0.849

0.180

0.255

0.106

0.940

  1. PREp positive pre-ejection, PREn negative pre-ejection, POEn negative post-ejection, POEp positive post-ejection