Table 1 Table showing the difference of texture features (contour analysis) in zoomed images and those without zoom. The latter were subsequently resampled to equalise their resolution (pixels/mm) with the corresponding zoomed ones, by using bilinear (BLI) or bicubic (BCI) interpolation. Percent difference with zoomed image are also shown. Statistically significant differences are highlighted.

37.53, 26.67–55.60

34.89, 24.33–54.30

-7.04

0.094

32.56, 25.02–51.56

-13.24

0.286

37.68, 22.87–56.12

0.41

0.948

24.32, 19.87–29.12

25.03, 19.51–28.74

2.90

0.616

25.37, 18.90–30.84

4.31

0.616

25.19, 20.28–28.80

3.59

0.528

14.87, 11.07–19.77

16.98, 11.37–20.84

14.16

0.071

16.93, 11.75–20.01

13.82

0.267

16.08, 10.64–20.15

8.09

0.983

7.86, 6.33–13.21

8.53, 6.56–13.28

8.48

0.157

8.22, 6.11–12.83

4.56

0.5

7.56, 5.61–13.57

-3.84

0.231

4.30, 2.93–8.25

4.24, 3.60–7.18

-1.32

0.372

4.21, 2.56–7.39

-2.08

0.879

4.46, 2.28–7.34

3.90

0.372

2.45, 0.92–5.35

2.19, 1.41–5.45

-10.65

0.616

2.39, 0.71–5.09

-2.26

0.586

2.30, 0.78–4.48

-5.86

0.102

1.15, 0.16–2.91

1.11, 0.36–2.53

-3.73

0.687

1.00, 0.29–2.55

-13.10

0.266

1.04, 0.18–2.37

-9.46

0.586

0.356, 0.000–1.341

0.494, 0.000–1.427

38.94

0.638

0.366, 0.009–1.435

2.77

0.47

0.346, 0.000–1.284

-2.77

0.638

0.007, 0.000–0.632

0.043, 0.000–0.630

526.85

0.79

0.003, 0.000–0.622

-61.12

0.441

0.010, 0.000–0.611

43.62

0.333

0, 0–0

0, 0–0

N/A

0.465

0, 0–0

N/A

0.715

0, 0–0

N/A

0.273