| IVUS imaging advantages | IVUS imaging disadvantages | Preferable modality |
---|---|---|---|
Assessment of the effect of pharmacological treatment | • Able to quantify changes in plaque volume • IVUS-RF allows identification and quantification of changes in plaque's composition | • IVUS-RF identifies with moderate sensitivity/specificity a change from lipid to a fibrous plaque | IVUS |
Remodelling assessment | • Complete arterial wall visualisation | • Unable to identify accurately the outer vessel wall border in segments with calcified plaques. | IVUS |
Plaque characterisation | • Complete vessel wall visualisation • IVUS-RF allows identification of the type of the plaque with good overall sensitivity and specificity | • IVUS-RF identifies with moderate sensitivity/specificity lipid and fibrous plaques | IVUS-RF and OCT |
Detection of vulnerable plaque | • Accurate measurement of luminal dimensions, plaque area and remodelling • IVUS-RF allows identification of the type of the plaque with good overall sensitivity and specificity | • Limited axial resolution - unable to measure the fibrous cap • Moderate sensitivity in detecting thrombus and plaque disruption/erosion • Unable to detect macrophages or intraplaque haemorrhage | OCT and IVUS-RF or combination of different imaging modalities |
Assessment of invasive treatments | • Reliable assessment of luminal, stent area and intima hyperplasia • Precise evaluation of stent expansion • Reliable evaluation of bioabsorbable stent recoil | • Limited capability in identifying vessel wall trauma (e.g. erosion, dissection) and thrombus • Incapable of assessing stent struts coverage | OCT or combination of OCT and IVUS |
Role of heamodynamics in atherosclerosis | • Complete vessel visualisation - plaque characterisation • Multitude of automated methodologies that allows IVUS segmentation and fusion of IVUS and angiography | • Limited capability in detecting vulnerable plaque characteristics | IVUS |