Skip to main content

Table 2 Static annular and valvular geometric parameters

From: Three-dimensional dynamic morphology of the mitral valve in different forms of mitral valve prolapse – potential implications for annuloplasty ring selection

 

Barlow (n = 27)

FED (n = 32)

Control (n = 18)

Annular parameters

   

 Antero-posterior diameter (mm)

37.3 ± 6a,b

34.4 ± 3.4b

30.9 ± 3.5

 Transverse diameter (mm)

46.6 ± 5.0a,b

43 ± 4.1b

37.7 ± 4.0

 3D mitral annular area (cm2)

15 ± 2.8a,b

13.3 ± 2.4b

10.6 ± 2.3

 Ellipticity index (%)

126 ± 13

125 ± 10

117 ± 29

 Non-planar angle of leaflets (°)

151.6 ± 16.4a,b

151.7 ± 12.7b

147.2 ± 12.4

 Annular height (mm)

4.2 ± 1.5

3.7 ± 1.4

4.0 ± 1.0

 AHCWR

13.1 ± 4.1b

13.9 ± 5.6

15.7 ± 3.7

Valvular parameters

   

 3D total leaflet area (cm2)

18.5 ± 4.9a,b

14.3 ± 2.9b

11.3 ± 2.7

 Prolapse height (mm)

7.5 ± 2.8a,b

5.8 ± 2.6b

0.8 ± 0.6

 Prolapse volume (ml)

3.8 ± 2.9a,b

1.2 ± 1.3b

0.0 ± 0.1

  1. Data are based on measurements on an end-systolic frame. Values are presented as mean ± SD
  2. aindicates significant difference between the Barlow and FED groups
  3. bindicates significant difference compared to control