Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 5 Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive predictive value, negative predictive value, diagnostic accuracy in monoparametric and multiparametric analyses for reverse remodeling induced by cardiac resynchronization therapy

From: Pilot study using 3D–longitudinal strain computation in a multi-parametric approach for best selecting responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy

  Sensitivity Specificity Positive predictive value Negative predictive value Diagnostic accuracy
septal flash 79% 79% 90% 61% 0.79
SDI L,peak > 1.037%.s−1 70.6% 7.6% 88.9% 52.4% 0.73
SDI L,peak > 1.037%.s−1 S Septal Flash 55.9% 92.9% 95% 46.4% 0.67
SDI L,peak > 1.037%.s−1 + AV 29.4% 92.9% 90.9% 35.1% 0.48
SDI L,peak > 1.037%.s−1 + IV 67.6% 92.9% 95.8% 54.2% 0.75
SDI L,peak > 1.037%.s−1 + AV + IV 29.4% 92.9% 90.9% 35.1% 0.48
SDI L,peak > 1.037%.s−1 + AV + IV + Septal Flash 23.5% 100% 100% 35% 0.46
  1. AV atrioventricular dyssynchrony, IV interventricular dyssynchrony, SDI L,peak standard deviation of the integrals of strain signals