Skip to main content

Table 2 Index of contractile asymmetry in standard apical views and six left ventricular sectors at baseline

From: Index of contractile asymmetry improves patient selection for CRT: a proof-of-concept study

 

All subjects (n = 89)

Responders (n = 66)

Non-responders (n = 23)

p-value †

Controls (n = 10)

p-value ‡

Two-chamber view, s− 1

0.52 ± 0.14

0.53 ± 0.15

0.48 ± 0.14

0.14

0.45 ± 0.13

0.6

Three-chamber view, s−1

0.71 ± 0.25

0.78 ± 0.23

0.51 ± 0.15

< 0.0001*

0.49 ± 0.12

0.66

Four-chamber view, s−1

0.75 ± 0.25

0.79 ± 0.25

0.62 ± 0.18

< 0.001*

0.42 ± 0.11

< 0.001*

ICA1, s−1

0.58 ± 0.18

0.61 ± 0.19

0.52 ± 0.16

0.03*

0.44 ± 0.12

0.12

ICA2, s−1

0.7 ± 0.23

0.74 ± 0.24

0.59 ± 0.18

0.002*

0.41 ± 0.11

0.002*

ICA3, s−1

0.76 ± 0.25

0.81 ± 0.24

0.6 ± 0.19

< 0.0001*

0.41 ± 0.08

< 0.001*

ICA4, s−1

0.75 ± 0.26

0.83 ± 0.24

0.55 ± 0.18

< 0.0001*

0.46 ± 0.09

0.08

ICA5, s−1

0.56 ± 0.18

0.61 ± 0.18

0.41 ± 0.1

< 0.0001*

0.43 ± 0.13

0.76

ICA6, s−1

0.42 ± 0.1

0.44 ± 0.11

0.39 ± 0.1

0.07

0.4 ± 0.13

0.89

  1. ICA Index of contractile asymmetry; *, p < 0.05; †, responders vs. non-responders; ‡, non-responders vs. controls