We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact us so we can address the problem.
Immunological evaluation of the new stable ultrasound contrast agent LK565: a phase one clinical trial
- B Funke†1,
- HK Maerz†1,
- S Okorokow†2,
- S Polata†2,
- I Lehmann†3,
- U Sack†3,
- P Wild†1,
- T Geisler†1 and
- RJ Zotz†1Email author
© Funke et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004
- Received: 12 May 2004
- Accepted: 10 September 2004
- Published: 10 September 2004
Ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) allow the enhancement of vascular definition, thereby providing more diagnostic information. LK565 is a new second-generation UCA based on synthetic polymers of aspartic acid which is eliminated from the blood stream via phagocytosis. LK565 forms very stable air-filled microspheres and is capable of repeated passage through the pulmonary capillary bed after peripheral intravenous injection. This characteristic allows examination of the cardiac function or extracardiac vessel abnormalities up to 15 minutes.
A phase one clinical study was conducted on 15 healthy volunteers to identify the development of an undesirable immune response. Phagocytosis capacity, TNF-α secretion, and MHC class II upregulation of monocytes was monitored, as well as microsphere specific antibody development (IgM, IgG). Furthermore, the kinetics of the activation surface markers CD69, CD25, CD71, and CD11b on leukocytes were analyzed.
Due to LK565-metabolism the administration of the UCA led to saturation of phagocytes which was reversible after 24 hrs. Compared to positive controls neither significant TNF-α elevation, neither MHC class II and activation surface markers upregulation, nor specific antibody development was detectable.
The administration of LK565 provides a comfortable duration of signal enhancement, esp. in echocardiography, without causing a major activation cascade or triggering an adaptive immune response. To minimize the risk of undesirable adverse events such as anaphylactoid reactions, immunological studies should be included in clinical trials for new UCAs. The use of LK565 as another new ultrasound contrast agent should be encouraged as a safe means to provide additional diagnostic information.
- Contrast Agent
- Indirect ELISA
- Ultrasound Contrast Agent
- Additional Diagnostic Information
- Specific Antibody Production
The particles consist of a synthetic polymer of aspartic acid. Via peptide bonds, the molecules form bold, stable beads filled with air. The average size of LK565 particles is 3 μm in diameter (figure 1). Because of their size and even polymeric surface the beads have similarities to microorganisms. This circumstance implies the induction of an immune response, which needs to be considered.
Results from previous studies indicate that phagocytes are responsible for eliminating the contrast agent from the blood stream . In vitro, it has been shown that macrophages and neutrophils quickly devour the LK565 particles. Preliminary studies proved that the LK565 particles are phagocytosed by macrophages, resulting in slight activation with an increase in the intracellular calcium content. However, there were no symptoms of a respiratory burst .
The activation of macrophages can lead to different conditions: no activation, normal activation, and overreaction. In the last case, over-expression of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) can lead to a septic shock by induction of intravascular blood clots apart from other effects, which may result in disseminated intravascular coagulation [13, 14]. Furthermore, macrophages act as antigen-presenting cells which are highly important to induce an adaptive immune response, i.e. specific antibody production. It is probable that the LK565 particles attract antigen-presenting cells to present LK565 fragments as antigens. This may induce the production of specific antibodies against the contrast agent, which in rare cases could result in pathogenic immune reactions. The aim of this study was to examine a possible immune response to LK565 considering phagocytosis, TNF-α secretion by macrophages, lymphocyte activation and specific antibody production.
The experiment was approved by the local ethics committee (registration number 708/98). After medical examination, 15 healthy male volunteers under the age of 30 were enrolled in this phase one clinical study. Each volunteer was exposed to a single dose of the contrast agent LK565 applied intravenously. Four participants were exposed to the contrast agent LK565 for the second time because they had already been involved in a prior study . The 15 volunteers were divided up into 3 groups (n = 5). The first group received 0.15 mg/kg bodyweight, the second group 0.4 mg/kg bodyweight and finally the third group 0.7 mg/kg LK565.
Prior to application, the contrast agent LK565 was dissolved in 10 ml physiological sodium chloride solution (37°C) under sterile conditions. To eliminate aggregations, the solution was filtered using a 20 μm mesh just before intravenous injection.
Heparinized blood samples (2 ml) were taken before application (t = 0), after 2 h, 6 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 96 h, and 1 ml after 10 d, 12 d and 14 d. For routine analysis, additional blood samples were drawn before and 2 hours after intravenous contrast agent injection. The volunteers were under medical care throughout the whole experiment.
Phagocytosis capacity was determined in vitro before (t = 0) and after 2 h, 6 h and 24 h with Phagotest™ (Becton Dickinson, Germany) and analyzed via flow cytometry (FACScalibur™, BectonDickinson, Germany). FITC-labeled E. coli, which were opsonized with antibodies and complement factors, were incubated with leukocytes. After incubation, the increased fluorescence of the phagocytes was due to the uptake of bacteria. The fluorescence intensity is dependent on the amount of phagocytosed bacteria. A sample chilled on ice was used for control.
Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α)
Intracellular TNF-α production in monocytes and macrophages was analyzed before (t = 0) and after 2 h, 6 h, and 24 h. For detection, an anti-human TNF-α Pycoerythrin (PE) monoclonal antibody (mAb) was applied (Pharmingen, Germany). The specificity of the antibody had been validated in blocking experiments. To 40 μl blood, 145 μl RPMI and 15 μl 40 μM Monensin were added (Monensin prevents cytokine release by blocking the golgi apparatus). Cells were incubated for 2 h at T = 37°C and 5% CO2 atmosphere. After washing, monocytes were surface stained by anti-human CD14 TriColor mAb (Medac, Germany). Red blood cells were lysed using FACS™ Lysing Solution (Becton Dickinson, Germany). Cells were fixed and permeabilized by addition of 250 μl Cytofix/Cytoperm™ (Becton Dickinson, Germany). Finally, the retained intracellular TNF-α was stained by the anti-TNF-α PE mAb. For a positive control, cells were stimulated with 0.25 μg Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), following the same procedure as mentioned above.
Surface activation markers
Surface activation markers were analyzed before (t = 0) and after 2 h, 6 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, and 96 h. For the detection of activation markers, anti-human CD69 PE (Holzel Diagnostika, Germany), CD25 Fluoresceinisothiocyanat (FITC), CD71 FITC, CD11b PE (Diaclone Research, Germany) and HLA-DR PerCP (Becton Dickinson, Germany) mAbs were used. For a positive control, cells were stimulated with 10 ng/ml Phorbol-12-Myristat-13-Acetat (PMA) and 1 μg/ml Ionomycin for 2 h, while macrophages/monocytes were stimulated with 1.25 μg/ml LPS for 2 h. To distinguish between leukocytes, additional surface markers, anti-human CD45 Allophycocyanine (APC), CD19 APC (Caltag Laboratories, Germany), CD3 Tri/Color (DAKO, Germany) and CD14 FITC (Diaclone Research, Germany) mAbs were used for detection. Blood samples (40 μl) were stained for 4-color flow cytometry analysis. After staining, red blood cells were lysed, subsequently leukocytes were analyzed. Antibody specificity was validated by isotype controls (Becton Dickinson, Germany).
Specific antibody development
Serum samples were analyzed before (t = 0) and after 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 96 h, 10 d, 12 d, and 14 d. Specific anti-LK565 antibodies were determined via indirect ELISA. Indirect ELISA was performed in a 96-well plate by LK565 immobilization overnight. Optimal concentrations had previously been determined by common cross-testing. Serum was obtained from blood samples after centrifugation at 400 G. After incubation for 2 h at room temperature, detector antibodies (Biozol Diagnostica GmbH, Germany) were added and incubated at 4°C overnight. Washing was carried out with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and blocking buffer. For detection, alkaline phosphatase (AP)-linked goat-anti-human IgG and IgM antibodies with para-Nitrophenylphosphate (p-NPP) as substrate (Biozol Diagnostica GmbH, Germany) were used. After development, the enzyme reaction was stopped with 0.5 M NaOH and measured at λ = 405 nm. For the functional (positive) control of the indirect ELISA, total immunoglobuline was captured polyclonally. For a negative control, the serum of a person who had not been exposed to the contrast agent was obtained.
We investigated 15 volunteers in a clinical phase one trial over a period of 14 days. The kinetics of activation surface markers CD69, CD25, CD71 and CD11b on leukocytes, the phagocytosis capacity, and TNF-α production in monocytes were analyzed, as was the specific antibody production after LK565 application.
The expression of CD69 , CD25 , CD71, HLA-DR , and CD11b  is increased after activation . CD69 will be presented quickly after activation on almost all leukocytes normally after some hours but on neutrophils even after a few minutes due to mobilisation of intracellular storages . The α-chain of the IL-2 receptor CD25, also known as the high-affinity receptor on lymphocytes, is developed after 6 hours at the earliest and up to 1–2 days. Transferrin receptor CD71 correlates directly with cell proliferation and a late marker which can be expected after 3–4 days similar to antigen presentation via MHC-II analyzed as HLA-DR. Integrin expression (CD11b) on monocytes and neutrophils is associated with phagocyte migration into tissue .
Independent of dosage or repeated contact, the contrast agent LK565 was well tolerated by all volunteers. After exposure to LK565 no erythema, no drop in blood pressure, neither significant change of the heart frequency nor fever occurred (data not shown). The volunteers did not complain of relevant clinical symptoms such as chest discomfort or asthenia. It exhibited good opacification of both ventricles a few seconds after application (figure 2). While the minimum dosage of 0.15 mg/kg LK565 was sufficient for just one echocardiogram, a suitable duration of echo contrast was obtained at a 0.4 mg/kg dose. A further increase in dosage provided no improvement in quality or contrast duration (data not shown).
The results show that there is only a slight activation of leukocytes esp. of phagocytes after application of LK565, a particular contrast agent based on a polymer of the naturally occurring amino aspartic acid. No specific antibody development against the contrast agent was detected. Thus, the risk of a major immunological activation cascade after repeated dosage can be regarded as minor. Since LK565 does not lead to an adaptive immune activation in this study, the possibility of an overexpression of IgE, which plays a key role in allergic diseases, also becomes more unlikely. Although none of the 15 volunteers enrolled in this phase I study developed an allergic-type reaction, such reactions could, however, occur in further phases of clinical testing or application. An allergic reaction against a pharmaceutical drug is a rare event which is impossible to exclude even in large clinical studies.
An increase in CD11b/CD18 is connected with phagocytosis and the diapedesis readiness of phagocytes. LK565 is eliminated from the blood stream via phagocytosis, therefore neutrophils exhibited an increase in CD11b expression and phagocytosis activity. This is also connected to a temporary higher intracellular TNF-α level in monocytes.
On lymphocytes, especially T-cells, the cascade of CD69, CD25 and CD71 is closely related to an immune response. After expression of CD69, the interlinkage of the receptor leads to proliferation and secretion of IL-2, IFN-γ and TNF-α. After effective activation, the T-cells secrete IL-2 which activates the development of the high-affinity IL-2 receptor CD25 and therefore launches cell proliferation with an expression of CD71 after 3 – 4 days. During our study after LK565 application no major activation cascade was detected on either T-cells or B-cells.
As mentioned above, the best contrast performance for echocardiography was obtained at a LK565 dosage of 0.4 mg/kg. Opacification of both ventricles was not enhanced by a further increase in dosage. Bearing in mind the fact that the contrast agent is phagocytosed and uptake capacity is limited, it is recommended that the daily dosage does not exceed 90 mg, which is equivalent up to three echocardiograms per day.
To minimize the risk of an undesirable adverse event such as an anaphylactoid reaction, immunological studies should be included in clinical trials for new UCAs. The use of LK565 as another new ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) with a comfortable duration of signal enhancement esp. in echocardiography should be encouraged as a means to provide additional diagnostic information without causing a major activation cascade or triggering an adaptive immune response. This can be an advantage for the "difficult-to-image" patient with adverse reactions related to other UCAs.
- Feinstein SB: Myocardial perfusion: contrast echocardiography perspectives. Am J Cardiol. 1992, 69: 36H-41H. 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90644-EView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meltzer RS, Tickner EG, Sahines TP, Popp R: The source of ultrasound contrast effect. J Clin Ultrasound. 1980, 8: 121-127.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cheng SC, Dy TC, Feinstein SB: Contrast echocardiography: review and future directions. Am J Cardiol. 1998, 81: 41G-48G. 10.1016/S0002-9149(98)00053-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smith MD, Kwan OL, Reiser HJ, DeMaria AN: Superior intensity and reproducibility of SHU-454, a new right heart contrast agent. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984, 3: 992-998.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Keller MW, Glasheen W, Kaul S: Albunex: a safe and effective commercially produced agent for myocardial contrast echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1989, 2: 48-52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zotz RJ, Genth S, Erbel R, Dieterich HA, Meyer J: Contrast echocardiography of the left ventricle an independent predictor of pulmonary artery pressure?. Int J Card Imaging. 1994, 10: 195-203.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schneider M, Arditi M, Barrau MB, Brochot J, Broillet A, Ventrone R, Yan F: BR1: a new ultrasonographic contrast agent based on sulfur hexafluoridefilled microbubbles. Invest Radiol. 1995, 30: 451-457.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grayburn P: Perflenapent emulsion (EchoGen): a long-acting phase shift agent for contrast echocardiography. Clin Cardiol. 1997, 20 (10 Suppl 1): I12-I18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cohen JL, Cheirif J, Segar DS, Gillam LID, Gottdiener JS, Hausnerova E, Bruns DE: Improved left ventricular endocardial border delineation and opacification with OPTISON (FS069), a new echocardiographic contrast agent. Results of a phase-III multicenter trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998, 32: 746-752. 10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00311-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zotz R, Genth S, Grande J, Walch A, Ziehn P, Krone V, Schuler G: Polymer microparticles for right and left heart echocardiography and imaging myocardial perfusion after peripheral vein injection. Z Kardiol. 1996, 85: 924-931.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zotz RJ, Schenk S, Kuhn A, Schlunken S, Krone V, Bruns W, Genth S, Schuler G: Safety and efficacy of LK565 – a new polymer ultrasound contrast medium. Z Kardiol. 2001, 90 (6): 419-26. 10.1007/s003920170152View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maerz HK, Okorokow S, Polata S, Lehmann 1, Schneider P, Zotz R: The Fate of ECHO Beads 11 – Immunological Response or Not?. Immunbiol. 1999, 200: 361-Google Scholar
- Morrissette N, Gold E, Aderem A: The macrophage – a cell for all seasons. Trends Biol. 1999, 9: 199-210. 10.1016/S0962-8924(99)01540-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hofsli E, Bakke 0, Nonstad U, Espevik T: A flow cytometric and immunofluorescence microscopic study of tumor necrosis factor production and localization in human monocytes. Cell Immunol. 1989, 122: 405-415.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Testi R, D'Ambrosio D, De Maria R, Santoni A: The CD69 receptor: a multipurpose cell-surface trigger for hematopoietic cells. Immunol Today. 1994, 15: 479-483. 10.1016/0167-5699(94)90193-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Werfel T, Boeker M, Kapp A: Rapid expression of the CD69 antigen on T cells and Natural Killer cells upon antigenic stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cell suspensions. Allergy. 1997, 52: 465-469.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arva E, Andersson B: Kinetics of cytokine release and expression of lymphocyte cell-surface activation markers after in vitro stimulation of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells with Streptococcus pneumoniae. Scand J Immunol. 1999, 49: 237-243. 10.1046/j.1365-3083.1999.00470.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Prieto J, Beatty PG, Clark EA, Patarroyo M: Molecule mediating adhesion of T and B cells, monocytes and granulocytes to vascular endothelial cells. Immunology. 1988, 63: 631-637.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Thompson HL, Matsushima K: Human polymorphonuclear leukocytes stimulated by tumour necrosis factor-alpha show increased adherence to extracellular matrix proteins which is mediated via the CD11b 18 complex. Clin Exp Immunol. 1992, 90: 280-285.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Craston R, Koh M, McDermott A, Ray N, Prentice HG, Lowdell MW: Temporal dynamics of CD69 expression on lymphoid cells. J Immunol Meth. 1997, 209: 37-45. 10.1016/S0022-1759(97)00143-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lundgren-Akerlund E, Olofsson AM, Berger E, Arfors KE: CD11b/CD18-dependent polymorphnuclear leukocyte interaction with matrix proteins in adhesion and migration. Scand J Immunol. 1993, 37: 569-574.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.