Coronary flow reserve (CFR) recording by means of transthoracic echocardiography (TTDE) in all the main distal coronary arteries is a challenge for advanced echocardiography. Validation studies of TTDE versus Doppler-wire (DW) recordings are available for Left Anterior Descending artery (LAD) and the Posterior Descending coronary artery (PD), but lacking for the more technically challenging Left Circumflex coronary artery (LCx).
Aim
To evaluate the reliability of TTDE in assessing CFR in LCx when compared to the intracoronary Doppler flow-wire gold standard.
Methods
we evaluated 5 patients (age = 60 ± 9 years, 5 males) on LCx by TTDE and invasive CFR assessment. TTDE recording was performed using a low-frequency probe, with a four-chamber as a guiding 2D view. The 2 tests were performed on different days and in random order within 48 hours in a blind fashion. Vasodilator stimulus was adenosine, intravenously (140 γ/kg/min × 3–6 min) for TTDE and intracoronary (40 γ bolus) for DW recordings.
Results
CFR values on LCx ranged from 1.9 to 2.8 for DW, and from 2.0 to 3.0 for TTDE, with an overall correlation of R = 0,85 (p = 0,06); normal (CFR > 2.5) or abnormal (CFR < 2.5) value was concordantly identified by the 2 techniques in 4 out 5 cases (80%).
Conclusion
CFR of LCx artery can be obtained noninvasively with TTDE.
Background
Coronary flow reserve (CFR) recording by means of transthoracic echocardiography (TTDE) in all the main distal coronary arteries is a challenge for advanced echocardiography. Clinical implications of such a possibility are involving an improved indication for invasive exams and for revascularisation, the evaluation of coronary flow after revascularisation, the new generation of stress-echo testing (CFR plus wall motion) and the non-invasive follow-up of patients [1–8].
Several studies concerning coronary flow and CFR recorded in the Left Anterior Descending coronary artery (LAD) and few in the Posterior Descending coronary artery (PD) have been published so far [9–12], and the measurement of CFR by TTDE was validated, by comparing it with intracoronary Doppler recordings (DW) in the same patient and in the same vessel, in some studies [13–16].
However, only few papers concerning the distal Left Circumflex coronary artery (LCx) have been published [17–19]. Technical difficulties may pose feasibility challenges to LCx recording like the supposed lack of a reference structure to identify the position of the distal branches of LCx on the lateral left ventricle wall or the poor lateral resolution of current equipments accounted for. Moreover, a comparison of TTDE with DW for LCx is still lacking.
In the present study we compared CFR measurements obtained by TTDE with those obtained with intracoronary DW in five patients.
Methods
Patients population and TTDE
Five patients (age 60 ± 9 years, 5 males, 2 with previous inferior myocardial infarction – patient 1 and 2), having a good echocardiographic window for the lateral wall, scheduled for coronary arteriography, were studied after informed consent was given. The 2 tests (TTDE and DW) were performed on different days and in random order within 48 hours in a blind fashion. Recordings of TTDE were obtained with a conventional echo-machine (Sequoia 256, Acuson-Siemens) equipped with its standard harmonic low-frequency probe (3Vc). A four-chamber view (4-C) was used for guiding TTDE recordings by adjusting frequency, limit of Nyquist (reduced to 40 cm/sec and more) and filtering of guiding color flow mapping (fig 1, 2). No contrast agent was used. Coronary flow signal search was made before by color-Doppler in the 2D view and then by pulsed Doppler. Plane of guiding 2D view was tilted and the region zoomed as necessary. The sample volume of pulsed Doppler was placed on the epicardial layer of the lateral wall in the basal and mid portions, avoiding the far apical portion where a signal recorded could belong to a Diagonal artery coming from LAD. The only reference structure relied was the lateral wall itself where Obtuse Marginal (OM) arteries (distal LCx) are running. No angle correction was used. When the typical coronary diastolic forward flow pattern along the lateral wall of the left ventricle was recorded, CFR was calculated by giving adenosine infusion (140 γg/Kg/min for 3 to 6 min) from the ratio of post-to-pre peak diastolic velocity (fig. 3A–B, 4A–B, 5A–B, 6A–B, 7A–B).
Figure 1
Plan of section of LCx branches made by the four-chamber view. 4-C: four-chamber view. LCx: left circumflex artery.
Figure 2
Color flow mapping of the coronary artery on the lateral wall (arrow).
Figure 3
Patients 1. A: TTDE before adenosine. B: TTDE after adenosine. C: DW recording. D: coronary angiography with site of DW recording (arrow). DW: Doppler-wire. TTDE: transthoracic Doppler echocardiography.
Figure 4
Patients 2. A: TTDE before adenosine. B: TTDE after adenosine. C: DW recording. D: coronary angiography with site of DW recording (arrow). DW: Doppler-wire. TTDE: transthoracic Doppler echocardiography.
Figure 5
Patients 3. A: TTDE before adenosine. B: TTDE after adenosine. C: DW recording. D: coronary angiography with site of DW recording (arrow). DW: Doppler-wire. TTDE: transthoracic Doppler echocardiography.
Figure 6
Patients 4. A: TTDE before adenosine. B: TTDE after adenosine. C: DW recording. D: coronary angiography with site of DW recording (arrow). DW: Doppler-wire. TTDE: transthoracic Doppler echocardiography.
Figure 7
Patients 5. A: TTDE before adenosine. B: TTDE after adenosine. C: DW recording. D: coronary angiography with site of DW recording (arrow). DW: Doppler-wire. TTDE: transthoracic Doppler echocardiography.
Coronary arteriography and DW recording
After performing diagnostic coronary angiography, a 0.014" angioplasty Doppler guide wire (Flow Wire, Jomed) trough a 6 Fr guiding catheter was advanced in the target coronary branch 1 to 2 cm distal to the last stenosis (i.e. the first LCx branch with a diameter ≥ 2 mm running toward the lateral wall) or, if no angiographically detectable stenosis was present, in the proximal segment of the target branch. When a position where a clearly defined and stable velocity signal was found and recorded, 40 γ of adenosine were injected intracoronary and the maximum increase of flow velocity was recorded to calculate CFR. Adenosine injection was repeated three times and data averaged. Percent of coronary artery area stenosis was calculated by offline quantitative coronary angiography (QCA-CMS vers. 5.1, Medis, Nuenen, The Netherlands) (fig. 3C–D, 4C–D, 5C–D, 6C–D, 7C–D).
Statistical analysis
Continuous data are presented as mean ± Standard Deviation. A sample linear regression analysis with Pearson's coefficient was used to assess the relationship between CFR values obtained with invasive (DW) and non-invasive (TTDE) methods.
Results
CFR values ranged from 1,9 to 2,8 for invasive DW, and from 2,0 to 3,0 for TTDE, with an overall correlation of R = 0,85 (p = 0,06). A normal (CFR > 2,5) or abnormal (CFR < 2,5) value was concordantly identified by the two techniques in 4 out of 5 cases (80%) . (Table 1)
Discussion
The non-invasive recording of the coronary flow by means of TTDE is an important progress of echocardiography in the field of coronary artery disease. The evaluation of CFR in the LAD and PD territory by TTDE already found a clinical application in the practice in some centres. Important applications are involving the status of the coronary circulation after myocardial infarction or coronary revascularisation [2, 3, 5, 15] and the clinical use of the on-developing new generation of stress-echo [20, 21]. As stated, from a physiological point of view, the largest part of informations comes from recording the flow from a distal segment of the coronary artery. This explains why CFR measured by transesophageal echocardiography on the proximal coronary arteries does not correspond to the status of the distal coronary circulation.
LCx distal CFR recording has been reported until now in few papers only [17–19] with a described feasibility of about 80%; however, a comparison with DW method is still lacking.
In the present paper we recorded the flow reserve from the arteries running along the basal and mid lateral wall. These arteries are the OM branches of LCx if the recording is made on the basal or mid lateral wall in a 4-C plane. In fact, the plane of the Diagonal branches of LAD is lying superiorly (fig 1). No reference structure other than the lateral wall itself is necessary to be followed to record the distal LCx, in our opinion. Following these rules, in our patients, we could observe a good comparability in CFR measurements between TTDE and DW either in terms of profile of the Doppler spectrum and in the values of CFR. The borderline statistical significance ought to be due to the sample tininess.
We underline that the present study was neither a feasibility one nor it was its target to assess the improvement of feasibility by using contrast agents. This is why we enrolled non-consecutive patients. To add informations around CFR, particularly in the region of the lateral wall, would be very helpful in assessing the presence of global ischemic response to vasodilators in the course of stress test, as long as this region has a low sensitivity for wall motion marker alone. However, further large studies are needed to precisely assess the applicability of LCx CFR calculation by TTDE in the clinical practice in order to completely evaluate, through a non invasive method, the functional status of coronary circulation.
Table 1
Results
TTDE
Doppler-wire
Quantitative angio
Vmax1
Vmax2
CFR
Vmax1
Vmax2
CFR
% area stenosis
Vessel
Pt 1
0,30
0,9
3
0,3
0,7
2,3
0
OM3
Pt 2
0,30
0,7
2,3
0,3
0,6
2
37
OM1
Pt 3
0,3
0,6
2
0,2
0,4
2
70
dist LCx
Pt 4
0,3
0,9
3
0,28
0,77
2,8
0
OM1
Pt 5
0,5
1
2
0,43
0,8
1,9
13
OM1
Limitations
A problem raised in TTDE flow recordings of distal LCx is that one is not certain about which of the vessel on the lateral wall (OM1, OM2) is recorded. However, this is the same for LAD recordings when sometimes a Diagonal branch is recorded in the position of distal LAD. And, in any case, a result of an impaired CFR might be a clinically relevant pushing drive for a further work-up.
For technical reasons only few patients were studied here and larger series are necessary to substantiate our pilot observation.
Abbreviations
Vmax1:
flow velocity before Adenosine (m/s)
Vmax 2:
flow velocity after Adenosine (m/s)
CFR:
coronary flow reserve
TTDE:
transthoracic Doppler echocardiography
Pt:
patient
LCx:
Left Circumflex artery
OM:
Obtuse Marginal artery
Declarations
Acknowledgements
We thank Mrs. Filomena Agostini, the sonographer.
Authors’ Affiliations
(1)
Department of Cardiovascular Disease – Echocardiography Unit, S. Filippo Neri Hospital
(2)
Coronary Intervention Unit and ROMA ("Ricerche Orientate sulla Malattia Aterosclerotica") core lab, S. Filippo Neri Hospital
References
Caiati C, Montaldo C, Zedda N, Bina A, Iliceto S: New noninvasive method for coronary flow reserve assessment: contrast-enhanced transthoracic second harmonic echo Doppler.Circulation 1999, 99: 771-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Ruscazio M, Montisci R, Colonna P, Caiati C, Chen L, Lai G, Cadeddu M, Pirisi R, Iliceto S: Detection of coronary restenosis after coronary angioplasty by contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiographic Doppler assessment of coronary flow velocity reserve.J Am Coll Cardiol 2002, 40: 896-903. 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02055-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Garot P, Pascal O, Simon M, Monin JL, Dupouy P, Elbaz N, Teiger E, Garot J, Gueret P, Dubois-Rande JL: Time course and relation to local viability of microvascular function and volume after reperfused acute myocardial infarction.Am J Cardiol 2002, 89: 1341-6. 10.1016/S0002-9149(02)02344-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Rigo F, Richieri M, Pasanisi E, Cutaia V, Zanella C, Della Valentina P, Di Pede F, Raviele A, Picano E: Usefulness of coronary flow reserve over regional wall motion when added to dual-imaging dipyridamole echocardiography.Am J Cardiol 2003, 91: 269-73. 10.1016/S0002-9149(02)03153-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Pizzuto F, Voci P, Mariano E, Puddu PE, Chiavari PA, Romeo F: Noninvasive coronary flow reserve assessed by transthoracic coronary Doppler ultrasound in patients with left anterior descending coronary artery stents.Am J Cardiol 2003, 91: 522-6. 10.1016/S0002-9149(02)03298-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Winter R, Gudmundsson P, Willenheimer R: Feasibility of noninvasive transthoracic echocardiography Doppler Measurement of coronary flow reserve in left anterior descending coronary artery in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a new technique tested in clinical practice.J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003, 16: 464-8. 10.1016/S0894-7317(03)00112-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Pizzuto F, Voci P, Mariano E, Puddu PE, Sardella G, Nigri A: Assessment of flow velocity reserve by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography and venous adenosine infusion before and after left anterior descending coronary artery stenting.J Am Coll Cardiol 2001, 38: 155-62. 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01333-XView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Ueno Y, Nakamura Y, Kinoshita M, Fujita T, Sakamoto T, Okamura H: Can coronary flow velocity reserve determined by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography predict the recovery of regional left ventricular function in patients with acute myocardial infarction?Heart 2002, 88: 137-41. 10.1136/heart.88.2.137View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Takeuchi M, Ogawa K, Wake R, Takise H, Miyazaki C, Otani S, Sakamoto K, Yoshikawa J: Measurement of coronary flow velocity reserve in the posterior descending coronary artery by contrast-enhanced transthoracic doppler echocardiography.J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2004, 17: 21-7. 10.1016/j.echo.2003.09.001View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Ueno Y, Nakamura Y, Kinoshita M, Fujita T, Sakamoto T, Okamura H: Noninvasive assessment of significant right coronary artery stenosis based on coronary flow velocity reserve in the right coronary artery by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography.Echocardiography 2003, 20: 495-501. 10.1046/j.1540-8175.2003.03085.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Voci P, Pizzuto F, Mariano E, Puddu PE, Chiavari PA, Romeo F: Measurement of coronary flow reserve in the anterior and posterior descending coronary arteries by transthoracic Doppler ultrasound.Am J Cardiol 2002, 90: 988-91. 10.1016/S0002-9149(02)02666-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Auriti A, Cianfrocca C, Pristipino C, Greco S, Galeazzi M, Guido V, Santini M: Improving feasibility of posterior descending coronary artery flow recording by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography.Eur J Echocardiogr 2003, 4: 214-20. 10.1016/S1525-2167(03)00014-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Hozumi T, Yoshida K, Akasaka T, Asami Y, Ogata Y, Takagi T, Kaji S, Kawamoto T, Ueda Y, Morioka S: Noninvasive assessment of coronary flow velocity and coronary flow velocity reserve in the left anterior descending coronary artery by Doppler echocardiography: comparison with invasive technique.J Am Coll Cardiol 1998, 32: 1251-9. 10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00389-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Kim SM, Shim WJ, Lim HE, Hwang GS, Song WH, Lim DS, Kim YH, Seo HS, Oh DJ, Ro YMJ: Assessment of coronary flow reserve with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography: comparison with intracoronary Doppler method.J Korean Med Sci 2000,15(2):139-45.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Lethen H, Tries HP, Brechtken J, Kersting S, Lambertz H: Comparison of transthoracic Doppler echocardiography to intracoronary Doppler guidewire measurements for assessment of coronary flow reserve in the left anterior descending artery for detection of restenosis after coronary angioplasty.Am J Cardiol 2003, 91: 412-7. 10.1016/S0002-9149(02)03235-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Lethen H, P Tries H, Kersting S, Lambertz H: Validation of noninvasive assessment of coronary flow velocity reserve in the right coronary artery. A comparison of transthoracic echocardiographic results with intracoronary Doppler flow wire measurements.Eur Heart J 2003, 24: 1567-75. 10.1016/S0195-668X(03)00284-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Saraste M, Vesalainen RK, Ylitalo A, Saraste A, Koskenvuo JW, Toikka JO, Vaittinen MA, Hartiala JJ, Airaksinen KE: Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography as a noninvasive tool to assess Coronary artery stenoses – a comparison with quantitative coronary angiography.J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005, 18: 679-85. 10.1016/j.echo.2004.09.016View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Fujimoto K, Watanabe H, Hozumi T, Otsuka R, Hirata K, Yamagishi H, Yoshiyama M, Yoshikawa J: New noninvasive diagnosis of myocardial ischemia of the left circumflex coronary artery using coronary flow reserve measurement by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography: comparison with thallium-201 single photon emission computed tomography.J Cardiol 2004, 43: 109-16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Murata E, Hozumi T, Matsumura Y, Fujimoto K, Sugioka K, Takemoto Y, Watanabe H, Yamagishi H, Yoshiyama M, Iwao H, Yoshikawa J: Coronary flow velocity reserve measurement in three major coronary arteries using transthoracic Doppler echocardiography.Echocardiography 2006, 23: 279-86. 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2006.00206.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Rigo F, Gherardi S, Galderisi M, Cortigiani L: Coronary flow reserve evaluation in stress-echocardiography laboratory.J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2006,7(7):472-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Rigo F: Coronary flow reserve in stress-echo lab. From pathophysiologic toy to diagnostic tool.Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2005, 3: 8. 10.1186/1476-7120-3-8View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
