Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Feasibility, safety and tolerability of accelerated dobutamine stress echocardiography

  • Giovanni Minardi1Email author,
  • Carla Manzara1,
  • Giovanni Pulignano1,
  • Paolo G Pino1,
  • Herribert Pavaci2 and
  • Martina Sordi2
Cardiovascular Ultrasound20075:40

https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-5-40

Received: 22 October 2007

Accepted: 21 November 2007

Published: 21 November 2007

Abstract

A continuous infusion of a single high dose of dobutamine has been, recently, suggested as a simple and effective protocol of stress echocardiography. The present study assesses the feasibility, safety, and tolerability of an accelerated dobutamine stress protocol performed in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease. Two hundred sixty five consecutive patients underwent accelerated dobutamine stress echocardiography: the dobutamine was administered at a constant dose of 50 μg/kg/min for up to 10 minutes. The mean weight-adjusted cumulative dose of dobutamine used was 330 ± 105.24 μg/kg. Total duration of dobutamine infusion was 6.6 ± 2.1 min. Heart rate rose from 69.9 ± 12.1 to 123.1 ± 22.1 beats/min at peak with a concomitant change in systolic blood pressure (127.6 ± 18.1 vs. 167.6 ± 45.0 mmHg). Dobutamine administration produced a rapid increase in heart rate (9.4 ± 5.9 beats/min2). The side effects were similar to those described with the standard protocol; the most common were frequent premature ventricular complexes (21.5%), frequent premature atrial complexes (1.5%) and non sustained ventricular tachycardia (1.5%); among non cardiac symptoms the most frequent were nausea (3.4%), headache (1.1%) and symptomatic hypotension (1.1%). No major side effects were observed during the test. Our data demonstrate that a continous infusion of a single high dose of dobutamine is a safe and well tolerated method of performing stress echocardiography in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease. This new protocol requires the administration of lower cumulative dobutamine dose than standard protocol and results in a significant reduction in test time.

Background

Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is commonly used to assess the extent, location, and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) and myocardial viability [16]. The duration and infusion dose of dobutamine for the assessment of myocardial ischemia and viability has been studied extensively [710]. Currently, in patients with suspected or known CAD, most laboratories use stepwise increments of dobutamine at 3-minute intervals, which has evolved from the commonly used exercise treadmill protocols. However, steady-state dobutamine levels during dobutamine infusion are not obtained for up to 10 minutes [5, 7, 11]. Consequently, the full effect of any infusion rate of dobutamine is not obtained before the dobutamine dose has advanced to the next level [12] and plasma dobutamine concentrations increase rapidly and non-linearly during the test [1, 13, 14]. Furthermore, previous studies have shown that patients treated with beta-adrenergic antagonists frequently fail to reach target heart rate [15, 16]. In these patients, the addition of atropine has been reported to improve the sensitivity of DSE by increasing the heart rate response [17]. Therefore, a continuous infusion of a single high dose of dobutamine has been suggested as a simple and effective protocol of DSE [1, 18]. The present study assesses the feasibility, safety, and tolerability of an accelerated dobutamine stress protocol (ADSE) performed in patients with suspected or known CAD.

Methods

Patient Population

Between March 2002 and October 2007, at San Camillo Hospital, we prospectively enrolled 265 consecutive patients (mean age 63.3 ± 11.6; males 185). All patients underwent ADSE. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients are reported in Table 1.
Table 1

Clinical characteristics of 265 patients

Clinical parameters

n

%

Age (yrs)

63.3

± 11.6

Male sex

185

69.8

   History

  

Hypertension

142

53.6

Diabetes mellitus

51

19.2

Dyslipidemia

116

43.8

Cigarette smoker

54

20.4

Previous MI

185

69.8

Previous CABG

19

7.2

Previous PTCA

112

42.3

Medication

  

β-blockers

77

29.1

Calcium channel blockers

72

27.2

Nitrates

58

21.9

Other

247

93.2

Values are expressed as mean ± SD or number (%) of patients unless otherwise stated.

CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; PTCA, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty;MI, myocardial infarction.

Indications for ADSE included evaluation of angina (n = 55), atypical chest pain (n = 22), ECG uninterpretable ECG (n = 15), chest pain in hypertensive patients (n = 11), risk stratification after myocardial infarction (n = 180), follow-up of PTCA (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) (n = 113) or CABG (coronary artery bypass grafting) (n = 20), preoperative risk assessment in non cardiac surgery (n = 3) and miscellaneous reasons (n = 16).

Patients were on therapy, if indicated, including a drug combination of β-blockers, long-acting nitrates, calcium antagonists, others (diuretics, aspirin, statins, ace inhibitors). (Table 1).

Whenever possible or indicated, beta-adrenergic antagonists were withheld for at least 72 h before stress echocardiography. Informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Dobutamine Accelerated infusion protocol

Dobutamine was administered at a constant dose of 50 μg/kg/min for up to 10 minutes. All dobutamine stress tests were performed under continuous 12-lead electrocardiographic (ECG) and non-invasive blood pressure monitoring. After obtaining rest heart rate, blood pressure and left ventricular two-dimensional echocardiographic images, the dobutamine infusion was initiated. Diagnostic endpoints of the test were:

positive echocardiogram(new onset wall motion abnormalities or worsening of baseline dissinergy); achievement of 85% of maximal predicted heart rate (220 - age); severe chest pain and/or diagnostic ST-segment changes.

The test was stopped without diagnostic endpoints for: Intolerable symptoms; hypertension(systolic blood pressure > 220 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure > 120 mmHg); hypotension (> 30 mmHg fall of blood pressure); supraventricular arrhythmias (supraventricular tachycardia or atrial fibrillation); or ventricular arrhythmias (ventricular tachycardia; frequent, polymorphous, premature ventricular beats). Dobutamine infusion was discontinued after 10 minutes or for 1 of the end points used in the standard protocol.

Echocardiographic analysis

Echocardiographic images were acquired at rest and during stress and recovery. Echocardiograms were recorded on videotapes and were also digitized on optical disk and displayed side by side in quad-screen format to facilitate comparison of images. The left ventricular wall was divided into 16 segments and scored using a 4-point scale, where 1 = normal, 2 = hypokinesia, 3 = akinesia, and 4 = dyskinesia [19]. Wall motion score index was derived by dividing the sum of individual score of the 16 segments by 16. The interpretation of images was performed by 2 experienced observers without knowledge of the patients' clinical data. In case of disagreement, a majority decision was achieved by a third observer. Ischemia was defined as new or worsening wall motion abnormalities.

Electrocardiographic analysis

Electrocardiographic changes were considered to be ischemic if an ST-segment shift ≥ 0.1 mV from baseline at 80 milliseconds after the J point occurred in at least 2 contiguous leads (in the absence of Q waves). In the case of right bundlebranch block, the ST-segment shift was considered to be significant when it also occurred in leads V5 and V6. Electrocardiographic changes were not taken as criteria for positivity of the test in the absence of induced new wall motion abnormalities. However, the development of ST-segment depression ≥ 2 mm or ST-segment elevation ≥ 1.5 mm was considered to be significant enough for interruption of the test. In patients with LBBB, pre-existing ST-segment depression ≥ 0.1 mV or paced rhythm as well as in patients taking digitalis or antiarrhythmic medications, electrocardiographic changes were considered nondiagnostic.

Statistical analysis

Values were expressed as the mean ± SD for continuous variables and as frequency and percentage for categorical variables. All data were analyzed by using SPSS 15.0 statistical software for Windows.

Results

Dobutamine doses and times of infusion (Table 2)

Table 2

Hemodynamic data of patients during stress echocardiography

Hemodynamic and stress test variables

mean ± SD

Heart rate (beats/min)

 

   Rest

69.9 ± 12.1

   Peak stress

123.1 ± 22.1

Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)

 

   Rest

127.6 ± 18.1

   Peak stress

136.3 ± 24.5

Rate-pressure product/100 (mm Hg/min)

 

   Rest

89.9 ± 22.8

   Peak stress

167.6 ± 45.0

Dobutamine cumulative dose (μg/kg)

330 ± 105.2

Stress time (min)

6.6 ± 2.1

Target heart rate (%)

169 (63.8%)

Heart rate acceleration (beats/min2)

9.4 ± 5.9

Values are expressed as mean ± SD.

The mean weight-adjusted cumulative dose of dobutamine used was 330 ± 105.24 μg/kg. Total duration of dobutamine infusion with ADSE was 6.6 ± 2.1 min.

Hemodynamic response (Table 2)

Heart rate rose from 69.9 ± 12.1 to 123.1 ± 22.1 beats/min at peak with a concomitant change in systolic blood pressure (127.6 ± 18.1 vs. 167.6 ± 45.0 mmHg).

Dobutamine administration produced a rapid increase in heart rate (9.4 ± 5.9 beats/min2).

Target heart rate was achieved in 169 out of 265 (63.8%) patients. Fifty three out of 96 (55%) patients without suboptimal chronotropic response were on therapy.

Pharmacologic stress echocardiography and electrocardiographic results

Wall motion abnormalities were present at baseline in 114 (43%) patients. The test resulted positive in 61 patients because of the occurrence of new or worsening wall motion abnormalities. Ischemic electrocardiographic changes occurred in 68 (25.7%) patients.

β-block

Only in 35 patients (13%) the administration of β-blockers at the end of the test was necessary.

Safety and feasibility

No major side effects were observed during the test. Minor side effects are listed in Table 3.
Table 3

Adverse effects observed during accelerated dobutamine stress echocardiography

Adverse effects

n

%

Symptoms

13

4.9

   Nausea

9

3.4

   Symptomatic hypotension

3

1.1

   Hypertension

0

0

   Dyspnea

0

0

   Headache

3

1.1

   Anxiety

0

0

   Tremor

1

0.4

   General disconfort

1

0.4

Arrhythmias

64

24.2

   Atrial fibrillation and flutter

2

0.75

   PACs (six or more per minute)

4

1.5

   Supraventricular tachycardia

1

0.4

   Junctional rhythm

0

0

   PVCs (six or more per minute)

57

21.5

   NSVT

4

1.5

   SVT

0

0

   Second-degree AV block

1

0.4

   Third-degree AV block

0

0

   Bundle branch block.

3

1.1

   Others

3

1.1

PACs, premature atrial complexes; PVCs, premature ventricular complexes; N/SVT, Non/sustained ventricular tachycardia.

Out of these effects the most frequent observed were nausea and PVCs.

Urination urgency was another side effect, never described before, frequently observed during the test (up to 30%). To obviate this problem, patients were kindly invited to urinate before beginning the test.

Discussion

Continuous high dose dobutamine stress echocardography is a new protocol to add to those in use in all echocardographic laboratories. Other studies using an accelerated dobutamine infusion protocol have been reported [2022]. In a previous study, Burger et al. using the same ADSE protocol, enrolled a smaller sample size of patients with suspected coronary artery disease and demonstrated that this protocol is safe, feasible and useful [1]. Our data confirm these results. Furthermore, our study showed that, in comparison with standard protocols, this new protocol required the administration of lower cumulative dobutamine dose. A significant reduction in test duration was also demonstrated [2326]. Therefore, ADSE can be proposed as a useful test in busy laboratories with high volume of activity for the diagnostic imaging of myocardial ischemia in some subgroups of patients. However we recommend physicians to chose the most suitable test for each single patient.

In this preliminary experience, we demonstrated that the hemodynamic response is good and comparable with that found in our Echo-lab using the standard protocol.

This protocol did not consider atropine co-administration which represents the state of the art dosage regimen needed to optimise the diagnostic accuracy of the test. Nevertheless, target heart rate achievment was similar to that reported in large, multicenter studies using dobutamine and atropine [2326].

The advantages of not employing atropine during stress were: reduced test time, reduced incidence of an unpleasant dry mouth, improved rate of performing diagnostic test in patients with narrow angle glaucoma, myasthenia gravis, obstructive uropathy or obstructive gastrointestinal disorders, reduced incidence of hypotension.

The ADSE protocol is a safe and well-tolerated method of performing stress echocardiography in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease. Furthermore, side effects were similar to those described with the standard protocol [2328].

Limits

Uncommon side effects occurring during dobutamine stress echocardiography protocol need a larger sample size and a multicenter experience to be better evaluated, as demonstrated by EPIC- EDIC studies [27, 29].

Our study represents the experience of a single centre, although a high flow and specialised one which cooperates with other institutional institutions in performing EPIC and EDIC studies and meets quality control requirements for stress echocardiographic readings.

This protocol is useful to evaluate myocardial ischemia although in the first 2 minutes it would be possible to study myocardial viability, since the dose of dobutamine corresponds approximately to the 10–20 μg/kg/min of the standard protocol.

The diagnostic accuracy and the prognostic power of ADSE was not assessed in this preliminary work. In the near future we shall evaluate these endpoints using coronary angiography for the anatomical assessment of coronary artery disease and myocardial scintigraphy, for the functional evaluation of inducible ischemia and long term clinical follow up data for the study of cardiac events.

Conclusion

The ADSE is a new protocol using a continuous single high dose of dobutamine. Such protocol is a safe and well tolerated method of studying patients with known or suspected CAD that, using a low cumulative dobutamine dose, achieves target heart rate in short time, without co-administration of atropine.

Further investigation will be necessary to confirm our results and determine diagnostic accuracy and prognostic power of the test.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Attilia Caroselli, Marina Rotoloni, Rita Venusti, Luca Guerrieri, Lino Fabrizi and Alda Lorettu for their skillful nursing assistance.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Cardiodiagnostica non invasiva, Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini
(2)
Second Division of Cardiology, Department of Heart and Great Vessels Attilio Reale, "Sapienza", University of Rome

References

  1. Burger AJ, Notarianni MP, Aronson D: Safety and Efficacy of an Accelerated Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography Protocol in the Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease. Am J Cardiol 2000, 86: 825-829. 10.1016/S0002-9149(00)01100-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Geleijnse ML, Fioretti PM, Roelandt JR: Methodology, feasibility, safety and diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997, 30: 595-606. 10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00206-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Poldermans D, Fioretti PM, Boersma E, Bax JJ, Thomson IR, Roelandt JR, Simoons ML: Long-term prognostic value of dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography in 1737 patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: a single-center experience. Circulation 1999, 99: 757-762.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Picano E, Sicari R, Landi P, Cortigiani L, Bigi R, Coletta C, Galati A, Heyman J, Mattioli R, Previtali M, Mathias W Jr, Dodi C, Minardi G, Lowenstein J, Seveso G, Pingitore A, Salustri A, Raciti M: Prognostic value of myocardial viability in medically treated patients with global left ventricular dysfunction early after an acute uncomplicated myocardial infarction: a dobutamine stress echocardiographic study. Circulation 1998, 98: 1078-1084.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Poldermans D, Arnese M, Fioretti PM, Boersma E, Thomson IR, Rambaldi R, van Urk H: Sustained prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography for late cardiac events after major noncardiac vascular surgery. Circulation 1997, 95: 53-58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Orsinelli DA, Daniels CJ: Pharmacologic stress echocardiography. Dobutamine and arbutamine stress testing. Cardiol Clin 1999, 17: 461-479. 10.1016/S0733-8651(05)70091-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Weissman NJ, Rose GA, Foster GP, Picard MH: Effects of prolonging peak dobutamine dose during stress echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997, 29: 526-530. 10.1016/S0735-1097(96)00558-XView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. McNeill AJ, Fioretti PM, el-Said SM, Salustri A, Forster T, Roelandt JR: Enhanced sensitivity for detection of coronary artery disease by addition of atropine to dobutamine stress echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 1992, 70: 41-46. 10.1016/0002-9149(92)91387-JView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Lewandowski TJ, Armstrong WF, Bach DS: Reduced test time by early identification of patients requiring atropine during dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1998, 11: 236-242. 10.1016/S0894-7317(98)70085-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chauvel C, Bogino E, Reynaud P, Fischer B, Montserrat P, Sourdille N, Dehant P: Usefulness of isometric exercise during dobutamine administration for stress echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 1998, 81: 255-258. 10.1016/S0002-9149(97)00875-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mazeika PK, Nadazdin A, Oakley CM: Dobutamine stress echocardiography for detection and assessment of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992, 19: 1203-1211.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Tuttle RR, Mills J: Dobutamine: development of a new catecholamine to selectively increase cardiac contractility. Circ Res 1975, 36: 185-196.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Weissman NJ, Nidorf SM, Guerrero JL, Weyman AE, Picard MH: Optimal stage duration in dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995, 25: 605-609. 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00450-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Daly AL, Linares OA, Smith MJ, Starling MR, Supiano MA: Dobutamine pharmacokinetics during dobutamine stress echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 1997, 79: 1381-1386. 10.1016/S0002-9149(97)00144-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Pingitore A, Picano E, Colosso MQ, Reisenhofer B, Gigli G, Lucarini AR, Petix N, Previtali M, Bigi R, Chiaranda G, Minardi G, de Alcantara M, Lowenstein J, Sclavo MG, Palmieri C, Galati A, Seveso G, Heyman J, Mathias W Jr, Casazza F, Sicari R, Raciti M, Landi P, Marzilli M: The atropine factor in pharmacologic stress echocardiography. Echo Persantine (EPIC) and Echo Dobutamine International Cooperative (EDIC) Study Groups. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996,27(5):1164-70. 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00586-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Daly AL, Linares OA, Smith MJ, Starling MR, and Supiano MA: Dobutamine Pharmacokinetics During Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 1997, 79: 1381-1386. 10.1016/S0002-9149(97)00144-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Tsutsui JM, Osorio AF, Lario FA, Fernandes DR, Sodre G, Andrade JL, Ramires JA, Mathias W Jr: Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of the Early Injection of Atropine During Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography With the Conventional Protocol. Am J Cardiol 2004, 94: 1367-1372. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.07.141View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Tighe JF, Vernalis MN, Taylor AJ, Weissman NJ: Accelerated dobutamine stress echocardiography: safety and feasability in healthy males [abstract]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1997, 10: 435.Google Scholar
  19. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, DeMaria A, Devereux R, Feigenbaum H, Gutgesell H, Reichek N, Sahn D, Schnittger I, et al.: Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1989, 5: 358-67.Google Scholar
  20. Lu D, Greenberg MD, Little R, Malik Q, Fernicola DJ, Weissman NJ: Accelerated dobutamine stress testing: safety and feasibility in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Clin Cardiol 2001, 2: 141-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. San Roman JA, Serrador A, Ortega JR, Medina A, Fernandez-Aviles F: Diagnostic accuracy of a new shorter dobutamine infusion protocol in stress echocardiography. Heart 2003, 89: 1089-1090. 10.1136/heart.89.9.1089View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Pastorius CA, Knickelbine T, Schum K, Nelson TF, Harris KM: Tolerability and Infusion Time of an Accelerated Infusion Dobutamine Echocardiography Protocol. Echocardiography 2007., 24: Google Scholar
  23. Cortigiani L, Picano E, Coletta C, Chiarella F, Mathias W, Gandolfo N, De Alcantara M, Mazzoni V, Gensini GF, Landi P, Echo Persantine International Cooperative (EPIC) Study Group; Echo Dobutamine International Cooperative (EDIC) Study Group: Safety, feasibility, and prognostic implications of pharmacologic stress echocardiography in 1482 patients evaluated in an ambulatory setting. AmHeart J 2001, 141: 621-9.Google Scholar
  24. Secknus MA, Marwick TH: Evolution of Dobutamine Echocardiography Protocols and Indications: Safety and Side Effects in 3,011 Studies Over 5 Years. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997, 29: 1234-40. 10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00039-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Mathias W Jr, Arruda A, Santos FC, Arruda AL, Mattos E, Osorio A, Campos O, Gil M, Andrade JL, Carvalho AC: Safety of Dobutamine-Atropine Stress Echocardiography: A Prospective Experience of 4033 Consecutive Studies. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1999, 12: 785-91. 10.1016/S0894-7317(99)70182-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Mertes H, Sawada SG, Ryan T, Segar DS, Kovacs R, Foltz J, Feigenbaum H: Symptoms, adverse effects, and complications associated with dobutamine stress echocardiography. Experience in 1118 patients. Circulation 1993, 88: 15-19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Picano E, Mathias W Jr, Pingitore A, Bigi R, Previtali M: Safety and tolerability of dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography: a prospective, multicentre study. Echo Dobutamine International Cooperative Study Group. Lancet 344: 1190-2. 1994 Oct 29 10.1016/S0140-6736(94)90508-8Google Scholar
  28. Varga A, Garcia MA, Picano, International Stress Echo Complication Registry: Safety of stress echocardiography (from the International Stress Echo Complication Registry. Am J Cardiol 98(4):541-3. 2006 Aug 15 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.02.064Google Scholar
  29. Picano E, Sicari R, Landi P, Raciti M, Pingitore A, Vassalle C, Mathias W Jr, Lowenstein J, Petix N, Gigli G, et al.: The multicentre trial philosophy in stress echocardiography: lessons learned from the EPIC study. EPIC-EDIC Study Project. Echo Persantine International Cooperative Study. Echo-Dobutamine International Cooperative Study. Eur Heart J 1995, 16: 2-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Minardi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement