Skip to content


  • Case report
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Interventricular septum hematoma during cineventriculography

  • 1Email author,
  • 2,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
Cardiovascular Ultrasound20086:4

  • Received: 27 August 2007
  • Accepted: 16 January 2008
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports



Intraseptal hematoma and subsequent myocardial infarction due to accidental contrast agent deposition complicating diagnostic cineventriculography is a previously undescribed complication of angiography.

Case presentation

A 61 year old man was admitted at intensive care unit because of unstable angina pectoris 1 hour after coronary angiography. Transthoracic contrast echocardiography showed a non-perfused area in the middle of interventricular septum with an increase of thickening up to 26 mm. Review of cineventriculography revealed contrast enhancement in the interventricular septum after contrast medium injection and a dislocation of the pigtail catheter tip. Follow up by echocardiography and MRI showed, that intramural hematoma has resolved after 6 weeks. After 8 weeks successful stent implantation in LAD was performed and after 6 month the patient had a normal LV-function without ischemic signs or septal thickening demonstrated by stressechocardiography.


A safe and mobile position of the pigtail catheter during ventriculography in the middle of the LV cavity should be ensured to avoid this potentially life-threatening complication. For assessment and absolute measurement of intramural hematoma contrast-enhanced echocardiography is more feasible than MRI and makes interchangeable results.


  • Left Anterior Descend
  • Interventricular Septum
  • Dalteparin
  • Suspected Coronary Artery Disease
  • Contrast Medium Injection


This case illustrates the first description of an accidental contrast agent deposition into the interventricular septum complicating cineventriculography in a patient with suspected coronary artery disease. Intramural hematoma developed subsequently-leading to myocardial infarction.

Case presentation

A 61 year old patient with sudden onset of typical angina pectoris, sweat and a sinus bradycardia of 40 beats per minute was admitted at intensive care unit. It was known, that he had an elective coronary angiography at the same day because of suspected coronary artery disease with typical chest pain and exercise induced dyspnoea as well as paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. His baseline treatment was for arterial hypertension metoprolol (150 mg/d) and ramipril (2,5 mg/d), for atrial fibrillation dalteparin (3 × 5.000 IU/d) and for expected angioplasty aspirin (100 mg/d) and loading dose of clopidogrel (300 mg at the first day). The coronary angiography report described a severe proximal type B2 stenosis and a medial type B stenosis of the left anterior descending artery (LAD). Intended angioplasty of the LAD and implantation of a special stent was planned for the next day.

At intensive care unit an ECG was performed because of unstable angina pectoris one hour after finishing angiography but without signs of acute myocardial ischemia. Transthoracic echocardiography (ViVid 7, GE Vingmed, Norton, Norway; 7,5 MHz ; very low non destructive transmit power technique, MI 0,12, non triggered mode; contrast agent Sonovue as bolus of 0,1 ml) demonstrated an increase of septum thickness from 13 mm to 26 mm. Septal strain (6%) as well as strain rate (0,45/s) showed an non perfused areal of 2,3 × 3,3 cm in the middle of interventricular septum. (Figure 1 and 2).
Figure 1
Figure 1

The dark color shows the intraventricular septum thickening (26 mm) and loss of perfusion in the medial septal segment (white arrowhead) demonstrated with low mechanical index contrast echocardiography.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Normal strain of basal intraventricular septum with 25% (yellow curve) and pathologic strain of middle intraventricular septum with 6% (green curve).

These echocardiographic and clinical findings were in accordance with an acute non-ST-segment elevation infarction of the interventricular septum in connection with angiography. Cineventriculography was reviewed again and revealed a contrast enhancement in the interventricular septum after conventional automated high flow contrast medium injection. Tip of pigtail catheter was dislocated in between the trabeculae of the interventricular septum (Figure 3).
Figure 3
Figure 3

Arrow indicates the contrast medium in the interventricular septum.

CK max value of 1082 U/l and Troponin I I value of 80 ng/ml were observed during the same day. The following day ECG showed ST-segment elevation in V1 (+0.15 mV) and V2 (+0.25 mV) indicating myocardial infarction. No ventricular arrhythmias or atrio-ventricular block caused by the septal infarction were observed. 2 days after contrast agent deposition into interventricular septum CK values decreased dewithin normal range. 2 weeks later, transthoracic echocardiography revealed a maximum of septum thickness with 28 mm, a non-perfused area of 2.6 × 4.7 cm with a strain of -4% and a strain rate of 0,45/s as well as an akinesia in the middle septum.

By magnetic resonance tomography an intramural hematoma was demonstrated 3 weeks after contrast medium injection into interventricular septum (Figure 4 and 5).
Figure 4
Figure 4

T1 weighted image in the short cardiac axis. Bright signal within the myocardium of the intraventricular septum shows intramyocardial hematoma (white arrow).

Figure 5
Figure 5

T1 weighted image, after application of 0,2 mmol/kg body weight Gadolinium-DTPA with a preparation pulse to "null" normal myocardium. A bright signal, surrounding the hematoma, indicating myocardial fibrosis can easily be depicted (late gadolinium enhancement, arrowhead).

6 weeks after contrast agent injection the baseline septum thickness (13 mm) was restored, the non-perfused region was reduced to 0.9 × 1 cm in mid septum with a strain of -7% and a width of 9 mm. 8 weeks after accidental intraseptal contrast agent injection patient underwent an elective angioplasty with successful implantation of two bare metal stents into LAD. At that point a MR-follow-up was performed (Figure 6).
Figure 6
Figure 6

MR-follow-up examination 8 weeks after contrast agent injection (same technique as described under Figure E): Transmural late gadolinium enhancement anteroseptal, transmural myocardial fibrosis (white arrow), no hematoma.

The final pharmacological dobutamin-stressechocardiography 8 month after complicated cineventriculography and 6 month after successfully implanted LAD stents revealed a negative viability (contractile reserve) midseptal but a normal global systolic left ventricular function without regional stress induced myocardial ischemia. (Figure 7 and 8).
Figure 7
Figure 7

Enddiastolic 4 chamber view of left ventricle.

Figure 8
Figure 8

Endsystolic 4 chamber view of left ventricle: midseptal akinesia and wall thinning (white arrowhead).

Discussion and conclusion

Intramyocardial hemorrhage is a rare but known complication of myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary artery intervention or angiography [17]. Intraseptal hematoma after ventricular septal defect closure is described in infants and requires surgically treatment [8, 9]. An interventricular septum hematoma and myocardial infarction due to accidental contrast agent deposition complicating diagnostic cineventriculography is a previously undescribed complication of angiography. Intramural hematoma can be detected by contrast echocardiography [10] and magnetic resonance imaging [11]. Our findings confirm interchangeable results of contrast echocardiography and MRI regarding to absolute measurements and reproducibility [10]. Furthermore, in our case the assessment of myocardial perfusion and scar by contrast echocardiography is as good as that of MRI.

The possible reason for this complication seems to be the in correct position of pigtail catheter followed by high pressure injection of contrast medium intramuraly. In addition complex strategy of antiplatelet- and anti Xa-medication may have forwarded rupture of vasa vasorum.


In conclusion, a safe and mobile position of the pigtail catheter during ventriculography in the middle of the LV cavity should be ensured to avoid this potentially life-threatening complication. For assessment and measurement of intramural hematoma contrast-enhanced echocardiography is more feasible than MRI and makes interchangeable results.



The authors gratefully thank Christine Scholz for excellent technical assistance. Written informed consent for publication was obtained from the patient.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Charite Campus Mitte, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Department of Radiology, Charite Campus Mitte, Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany


  1. Bekkers BCAM, Prenger K, Waltenberger J: Intramyocardial dissection after subacute anterior wall myocardial infarction. Heart. 2005, 91: e54-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Furushima H, Matsubara T, Tamura Y, Yamazoe M, Konno T, Ida T, Aizawa Y, Moro H, Watanabe H, Eguchi S: Coronary artery perforation with subepicardial hematoma. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1997, 41: 59-61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Gunning MG, Williams IL, Jewitt DE, Shah AM, Wainwright RJ, Thomas MR: Coronary artery perforation during percutaneous intervention: Incidence and outcome. Heart. 2002, 88: 495-8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Mieghem van C, Dens J, Herregods MC, Desmet W: Left ventricular wall hematoma and cardiac tamponade complicating percutaneous coronary intervention using IIb/IIIa antagonists. J Interven Cardiol. 2003, 16: 381-384. 10.1046/j.1540-8183.2003.01011.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Osuna JGG, Barcos AM, Diarte EC, Lezcano JSR, González , Peralta LJP: Conservative management of a post infarction intramyocardial dissecting hematoma. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2003, 56: 735-737.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Quan VH, Stone JR, Couper GS, Rogers C: Coronary artery perforation by cutting balloon resulting in dissecting subepicardial hematoma and avulsion of the vasculature. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005, 64: 163-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Vargas-Barrón J, Roldán FJ, Romero-Cárdenas A, Espinola-Zavaleta N, Keirns C, González-Pacheco H: Two- and three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographoc diagnosis of dissecting hematoma after myocardial infarction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2001, 14: 637-640.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Drago M, Butera D, Giamberti A, Lucente M, Frigiola A: Interventricular septal hematoma in ventricular septal defect patch closure. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005, 79: 1764-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Padalino MA, Speggiorin S, Pittarello D, Milanesi O, Stellin G: Unexpected interventricular septal hematoma after ventricular septal defect closure: intraoperative echocardiographic early detection. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2006; Jul 10, 13:23Google Scholar
  10. Olszewski R, Timperley J, Cezary S, Monaghan M, Nihoyannopoulis P, Senior R, Becher H: The clinical application of contrast echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiography. 2007, 8: 13-23. 10.1016/j.euje.2007.03.021.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Wagner A, Mahrholdt T, Holly TA, Elliott MD, Regenfus M, Parker M, Klocke FJ, Bonow RO, Kim RJ, Judd RM: Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study. Lancet. 2003, 361: 374-379.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© Grohmann et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.