Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Troponin as ischemic biomarker is related with all three echocardiographic risk factors for sudden death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (ESC Guidelines 2014)

  • Rafał Hładij1,
  • Renata Rajtar-Salwa1 and
  • Paweł Petkow Dimitrow1, 2Email author
Contributed equally
Cardiovascular Ultrasound201715:24

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12947-017-0115-6

Received: 6 August 2017

Accepted: 6 September 2017

Published: 13 September 2017

Abstract

Background

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk stratification is the most important preventive action in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). The identification of the ischemia biomarker high sensitive troponin I (hs-TnI) role for this arrhythmic disease may provide additional information for SCD risk stratification. The aim of the study was to compare echocardiographic parameters (prognostic for risk stratification of SCD in HCM) among two subgroups of HCM patients: with elevated hs-TnI versus non-elevated hs-TnI level.

Methods

In 51 HCM patients (mean age 39 ± 8 years, 31 males and 20 females) an echocardiographic examination, including the stimulating maneuvers to provoke maximized LVOT gradient, was performed. The hs-TnI was measured 24 h later.

Results

By comparing two subgroups of patients, 26 members with hs-TnI positive versus 25 with hs-TnI negative, the study showed that the values of all three parameters were greater: provocable left ventricular outflow tract gradient (LVOTG) – 49.1 ± 45.9 vs 25.5 ± 24.8 mmHg, p = 0.019; left atrial diameter – 50.1 ± 9.6 vs 43.9 ± 9.8 mmHg, p = 0.041; maximal LV thickness – 22.1 ± 5.3 vs 19.9 ± 34 mm, p = 0.029.

Conclusion

The increased value of all three echocardiographic parameters used as risk factors for SCD (ESC Guidelines) is related to the elevated level of hs-TnI in HCM. Due to the high LVOTG – great hs-TnI relationship, exercise stress, both diagnostic and even rehabilitation/training, should be monitored by biomarker control.

Keywords

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Troponin Echocardiography

Background

Among risk factors of SCD in HCM in current ESC Guidelines (1), three echocardiographic parameters are included. These echocardiographic parameters are precise due to unequivocal, accurate measurable, in current moment of risk stratification using risk calculator [1]. This calculator for sudden cardiac death risk does not include any biomarker. Calculator also did not include either the ischemic biomarker or signs and symptoms for myocardial ischemia. However, ischemic response to stress revealed by echocardiographic methods becomes more and more important [2, 3].

Very recently, a relationship between nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (ECG-Holter risk factor) and elevated troponin level has been reported [4].

High-sensitive troponin I (hs-TnI) is aprecise biomarker for the detection of myocardial ischemia. In previous HCM studies, the measurements of hs-Tn were performed only at a resting (without stress) echocardiography and not timely synchronized with maneuvers to provoke LVOTG by natural stimuli reflecting daily common physical activities for patients [58].

The aim of this study was compare to three echocardiographic parameters (risk factors for SCD: provocable LVOTG, left atrial diameter, maximal LV thickness at end diastole) between subgroups divided by the border value of h-s TnI concentrations in HCM patients. The cut-off value 19,5 ng/l was used according to producer instruction (bioMerieux VIDAS® High sensitive Troponin I). The 99th percentile of a presumably healthy population, the recommended cut-off has been defined at 19,5 ng/L [9].

We have compared echocardiographic parameters between subgroup patients with elevated hs-TnI level versus subgroup patients with non-elevated hs-TnI level.

Methods

Consecutive patients with HCM were recruited to the study. All patients fulfilled conventional diagnostic criteria for HCM. The exclusion criteria were as follows: ST-segment or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (recent or previous), significant coronary stenosis on coronary angiography, or renal failure.

The final sample included 51 patients with HCM (mean ± SD age, 39 ± 8 years; 30 men and 21 women). Coronary angiography was performed (due to indications) in 11 patients (result was normal or insignificant coronary artery stenosis <50%).

The patients on current pharmacotherapy were examined in the following 24-h cycle as follows: 8 a.m. echocardiography with LVOTG provocation by natural stimuli (orthostatic test and Valsalva test [1, 1012]- provocable LVOTG is more preference than resting in SCD calculator [1]) day phase physical activity with probably episodes of provocable LVOTG (unmeasurable), night phase period as a potential time for the rise of troponin, which level has been measured after night at 8 a.m. So far, no studies have used the following protocol. The patients has been asked to performed your common day physical activity and nocturnal resting. This protocol seems to be reasonable because hs-TnI levels may be related to the dynamic and labile nature of LVOTG with fluctuating peaks during the day time (provoked LVOTG as a potential cause for myocardial ischemia). During the first stage of our study we did not use upright exercise stress test to provoke LVOTG [12] because previous study had reported exercise-related Tn release [13].

Methodology of measurement of echocardiographic parameters has been based on ESC Guidelines [1]: As increased ventricular wall thickness can be found at any location, the presence, distribution and severity of hypertrophy should be documented using a standardized protocol for cross-sectional imaging from several projections. Correct orientation and beam alignment along orthogonal planes are essential to avoid oblique sections and over-estimation of wall thickness. Measurements of LV wall thickness should be performed at end-diastole, preferably in short-axis views. The most relevant parameter is the maximum LV wall thickness at any level [1]. Accordingly to ESC Guidelines [1] and previous Italian publication [14] we use anteroposterior LA diameter.

The workflow of echocardiographic examination has been as follows:
  1. a)

    standard echo examination in resting condition in supine position (the last stage of examination was LVOTG measurement using 5-chamber apical window).

     
  2. b)

    immediately, Valsalva maneuver was perform in supine position with LVOTG measurement

     
  3. c)

    patients were asked to stand up with their left hand on their head

     
  4. d)

    LVOTG was measured in 5-chamber apical when patient was in standing position

     

The study protocol was approved by the local institutional review board (Komisja Bioetyki Jagiellonian University KBET/119/B/2017). Informed consent was obtained from each participant.

Statistical analysis

Normally distributed continuous variables were presented as mean ± SD. Differences between two groups were assessed using independent t test. Correlations between hs-TnI levels and echocardiographic parameters were assessed using the Pearson correlation coefficient. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

The characteristics of patients are displayed in Table 1.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the patients

NYHA class

2.3 ± 0.7

CCS class

1.5 ± 0.5

Syncope

13

nsVT in Holter monitoring

16

Atrial fibrillation

9

Sudden death in family history

11

Creatinine, μg/l

88.2 ± 13.5

Systolic blood pressure mmHg at rest

129 ± 10

Diastolic blood pressure mmHg at rest

69 ± 8

Hs-TnI was detected in all HCM patients and patients with an abnormal level > 19,5 ng/l were defined as positive troponin subgroup.

By comparing the hs-TnI positive versus negative subgroups, the values of all three parameters were greater: left atrial diameter; maximal LV thickness, provocable LVOTG. Also, resting LVOTG was greater in hs-TnI positive subgroup (Table 2).
Table 2

Comparison between hs-TnI negative and positive subgroup

 

Trop negative

Trop positive

 

Parameters from echocardiography non-used as risk factors for SCD in calculator

 LV end diastolic diameter (mm)

39.3 ± 6.6

42.1 ± 5.5

NS

 Resting EF (%)

60.1 ± 11.7

62.6 ± 10.5

NS

 Resting LVOTG (mmHg)

13.1 ± 12.7

33.9 ± 30

P = 0.021

Parameters from echocardiography used as risk factors for SCD in calculator

 Provocable LVOTG (mmHg)

25.5 ± 24.8

49.1 ± 45.9

P = 0.019

 Left atrial diameter (mm)

43.9 ± 9.8

50.1 ± 9.6

P = 0.041

 Maximal LV thickness (mm)

19.9 ± 3.4

22.1 ± 5.3

P = 0.029

The Pearson correlations were statistically significant between provocable LVOTG and hs-TnI (r = 0.39, p < 0.05) as well as between resting LVOTG and hs-TnI (r = 0.37 p < 0.05).

Discussion

Best to our knowledge, current study is the first ever report about relationship between elevated hs-TnI and all three echocardiographic risk factors (measurements was timely synchronized) for sudden death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (ESC Guidelines 2014).

The impact of stress echocardiography in HCM is limited by the lack of standardization and outcome data. ECS guidelines recommend stress echocardiography solely for the evaluation of LVOT [1]. However, large-scale registry data show that SE positivity for ischemic criteria (such as new wall motion abnormalities and coronary flow velocity reserve), rather than inducible gradients predict adverse outcome in HCM [2]. In a large study [2], mortality was predicted using criteria for detecting ischemia on stress echocardiography. The authors concluded that stress echocardiography has an important prognostic role in patients with HCM, with ischemic endpoints showing a greater predictive accuracy than hemodynamic endpoints [2].

There is no unequivocal data regarding the hemodynamic mechanism for myocardial ischemia diagnosed with hs-TnI release in HCM. We suspect that elevated hs-TnI levels (related to episodes of provocable LVOT) are quite common during the daily activities of patients with HCM (even in pharmacotherapy). Therefore, we investigate the presence of and potential hemodynamic mechanism underlying the increased hs-TnI levels in relation to the findings on resting and provocable LVOTG.

Previously, in experimental studies (resting supine position) ischemia was induced by rapid atrial pacing and beta-receptor stimulation [15, 16]. Formerly, invasive measured marker of myocardial ischemia was lactate metabolism (myocardial lactate extraction indicated the difference between arterial and great cardiac vein lactate contents) [15, 16]. Negative difference was defined as lactate production and preciously indicate myocardial ischemia.

In HCM patients with LVOTG [15], transmural coronary flow reserve was exhausted at a heart rate of 130 beats/min; higher heart rates resulted in more severe metabolic evidence of ischemia (lactate production instead consumption) with all patients experiencing chest pain. At a heart rate of 150, most patients with basal LVOTG demonstrated an actual decline in coronary flow, which correlated with more severe metabolic evidence of ischemia [15]. In a study by Cannon et al. [17], majority patients with HCM with reversible thallium-201 abnormalities during exercise showed metabolic evidence of myocardial ischemia during rapid pacing (myocardial lactate production) associated with increase of LV end diastolic pressure. Beta-receptor stimulation increased LVOTG parallel with lactate production [16] and oppositely surgical reduction of LVOTG was associated with a beneficial shift from lactate production to consumption [18].

In previous study [19] ischemic injury assessed by CK-MB (long-term follow-up was started in 1987/88 years) was related with increasing left atrial diameter. In our study without follow-up, we use more sensitive biomarker and increased TnI level is related with greater left atrial diameter.

Currently, we can use an almost a perfect marker of ischemia, sampled from a peripheral vein i.e. troponin measured by the high-sensitive method.

In a recent review by McCarthy et al. [20], the utility of hs-Tn assessment in arrhythmic disease is only at the initial stage, but it has been proposed as a valuable screening marker for patients with HCM at a high risk of SCD.

Regular training exercise has recently been recommended for selected patients with HCM [21]. In our opinion, based on the association between provocable LVOTG and elevated troponin level in patients with HCM, we suggest that any exercise stress test in HCM patients (performed either for training or diagnostic purposes) should be controlled by troponin level measurements 6 and 12 h after the exercise).

Our study has several limitations. First, the current pharmacological treatment was maintained, and particularly β-blockers were not withdrawn. In our pilot study, we aimed to make the first-ever observation on the correlation between hs-TnI release and timely synchronized findings on echocardiography. Our preliminary study showed that β-blocker withdrawal or specially performed exercise test might not be safe among this group of patients. In future studies, we will attempt to increase the dose and use only one type of a β-blocker to decrease ischemia burden and the risk of troponin release in exercise test. We are going to perform upright exercise with LVOTG measurement at peak and post-exercise in upright position [10, 2224].

We decided to measure hs-TnI levels only once because our pilot study was conducted in an outpatient setting. The optimal protocol, that is, 48-h profile of troponin measurement with the assessment of troponin with echocardiographic examination every 8 h, would require the in-hospital setting for the study and would be more costly. Moreover, only an outpatient-based study provides an opportunity to assess patients during their common daily physical activities of patients, however daily activities between the patients were not well standardized by for example by questionnaire. The patients were asked to perform their common daily physical activities and nocturnal resting.

Conclusion

The increased value of all three echocardiographic parameters using as risk factors for sudden death are related to the elevated level of h-s troponin-I in HCM.

Clinical perspective

These findings suggest that hs-Tn may be useful as an additional biomarker for better risk stratification in HCM. Additionally, we have postulated that every exercise test in HCM should be controlled by the measurement of the troponin level after 8–12 h from the stress test.

Abbreviations

ESC: 

European Society of Cardiology

HCM: 

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Hs-TnI: 

High sensitivity troponin I

LVOTG: 

Left ventricular outflow tract gradient

SCD: 

Sudden cardiac death

Declarations

Acknowledgements

None

Funding

Jagiellonian University Grant.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

RH contributed to conception, contributed to acquisition and analysis, gave final approval. RSR contributed to conception and design, contributed to acquisition, analysis, and interpretation, critically revised manuscript gave final approval. PPD contributed to conception and design, contributed to acquisition, analysis, and interpretation, drafted manuscript, critically revised manuscript, gave final approval.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
2nd Department of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College
(2)
II Klinika Kardiologii CMUJ

References

  1. Authors/Task Force members, Elliott PM, Anastasakis A, Borger M, Borggrefe M, Cecchi F, Charron P, et al. 2014 ESC Guidelines on diagnosis and management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2733–79.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Ciampi Q, Olivotto I, Gardini C, D’Andrea A, Scali MC, Cortigiani L, et al. Prognostic role of stress echocardiography in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: The International Stress Echo Registry. Int J Cardiol. 2016;219:331–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Picano E, Ciampi Q, Citro R, D’Andrea A, Scali MC, Cortigiani L, et al. Stress echo 2020: the international stress echo study in ischemic and non-ischemic heart disease. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2017;15:3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Hładij R, Rajtar-Salwa R, Dimitrow PP. Associaton of elevated troponin levels with increased heart rate and higher frequency of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2017;126:445–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kubo T, Kitaoka H, Yamanaka S, Hirota T, Baba Y, Hayashi K, et al. Significance of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:1252–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hasler S, Manka R, Greutmann M, Gämperli O, Schmied C, Tanner F, et al. Elevated high-sensitivity troponin T levels are associated with adverse cardiac remodelling and myocardial fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Swiss Med Wkly. 2016;146:w14285.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kawasaki T, Sakai C, Harimoto K, Yamano M, Miki S, Kamitani T. Usefulness of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin and brain natriuretic peptide as biomarkers of myocardial fibrosis in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2013;112:867–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Moreno V, Hernández-Romero D, Vilchez J, García-Honrubia A, Cambronero F, Casas T, et al. Serum levels of high-sensitivity troponin T: a novel marker for cardiac remodeling in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Card Fail. 2010;16:950–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chenevier-Gobeaux C, Bonnefoy-Cudraz É, Charpentier S, Dehoux M, Lefevre G, Meune C, Ray P, SFBC, SFC, SFMU ‘Troponins’ workgroup. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays: answers to frequently asked questions. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2015;108:132–49.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dimitrow PP, Bober M, Michałowska J, Sorysz D. Left ventricular outflow tract gradient provoked by upright position or exercise in treated patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy without obstruction at rest. Echocardiography. 2009;26:513–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dimitrow PP, TO C. Standing position alone or in combination with exercise as a stress test to provoke left ventricular outflow tract gradient in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and other conditions. Int J Cardiol. 2010;143:219–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Dimitrow PP, Cotrim C, TO C. Need for a standardized protocol for stress echocardiography in provoking subaortic and valvular gradient in various cardiac conditions. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2014;12:26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Pop GA, Cramer E, Timmermans J, Bos H, Verheugt FW. Troponin I release at rest and after exercise in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and the effect of betablockade. Arch Cardiol Mex. 2006;76:415–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Nistri S, Olivotto I, Betocchi S, Losi MA, Valsecchi G, Pinamonti B, et al. Prognostic significance of left atrial size in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (from the Italian Registry for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy). Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:960–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cannon RO 3rd, Schenke WH, Maron BJ, Tracy CM, Leon MB, Brush JE Jr, et al. Differences in coronary flow and myocardial metabolism at rest and during pacing between patients with obstructive and patients with nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987;10:53–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Udelson JE, Cannon RO 3rd, Bacharach SL, Rumble TF, Bonow RO. Beta-adrenergic stimulation with isoproterenol enhances left ventricular diastolic performance in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy despite potentiation of myocardial ischemia. Comparison to rapid atrial pacing. Circulation. 1989;79:371–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Cannon RO 3rd, Dilsizian V, O’Gara PT, et al. Myocardial metabolic, hemodynamic, and electrocardiographic significance of reversible thallium-201 abnormalities in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 1991;83:1660–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Cannon RO 3rd, McIntosh CL, Schenke WH, Maron BJ, Bonow RO, Epstein SE, et al. Effect of surgical reduction of left ventricular outflow obstruction on hemodynamics, coronary flow, and myocardial metabolism in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 1989;79:766–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamada M, Shigematsu Y, Ohtani T, Ikeda S. Elevated cardiac enzymes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients with heart failure - a 20-year prospective follow-up study. Circ J. 2016;80:218–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. McCarthy CP, Yousuf O, Alonso A. High-sensitivity troponin as a biomarker in heart rhythm disease. Am J Cardiol. 2017;119:1407–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Saberi S, Wheeler M, Bragg-Gresham J, Hornsby W, Agarwal PP, Attili A, et al. Effect of moderate-intensity exercise training on peak oxygen consumption in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;317:1349–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Reant P, Dufour M, Peyrou J, Reynaud A, Rooryck C, Dijos M, et al. Upright treadmill vs. semi-supine bicycle exercise echocardiography to provoke obstruction in symptomatic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a pilot study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jew313. [Epub ahead of print].
  23. Reant P, Lafitte S, Reynaud A. How to perform stress/exercise echocardiography in -hypertrophic cardiomyopathy? Acta Cardiol. 2017;72:265–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Dimitrow PP, Rajtar-Salwa R. Obstructive form of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy-left ventricular outflow tract gradient: novel methods of provocation, monitoring of biomarkers, and recent advances in the treatment. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:1575130.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement