Coronary artery occlusions diagnosed by transthoracic Doppler
© Vegsundvåg et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 8 December 2013
Accepted: 5 March 2014
Published: 15 March 2014
Our aim was to assess whether anterograde flow velocities in septal perforating branches could identify an occluded contralateral coronary artery, and to assess the feasibility and accuracy of diagnosing occlusions in the three main coronary arteries by the combined use of several noninvasive parameters indicating collateral flow.
A total of 108 patients scheduled for coronary angiography because of chest pain or acute coronary syndromes were studied using transthoracic Doppler echocardiography.
Anterograde peak diastolic flow velocities (pDV) in septal perforating branches were higher in patients with angiographic occluded contralateral artery compared with corresponding velocities in patients without significant disease in the contralateral artery (0.80 ± 0.31 m/sec versus 0.37 ± 0.13 m/sec, p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve showed pDV ≥ 0.57 m/sec to be the optimal cutoff value to identify occluded contralateral artery, with a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 69%. Demonstration of at least one positive parameter (retrograde flow in main coronary arteries, reversed flow in septal perforating and left circumflex marginal branches, pDV ≥ 0.57 m/sec, or demonstration of other epicardial or intramyocardial collaterals) indicating collateral flow to an occluded main coronary artery had sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of 89%, 94%, 63%, and 99%, respectively, for detection of a coronary occlusion. With this combined use of several parameters, 25 of 28 coronary occlusions were identified.
By investigating several parameters indicating collateral flow, we were able to identify most of the main coronary occlusions in the patient cohort. Furthermore, our study demonstrated that coronary artery occlusions may result in complex and diverging coronary pathophysiology depending on which coronary artery segment is occluded and the extent of accompanying coronary artery disease.
KeywordsTransthoracic echocardiography Coronary occlusion Collateral flow
Coronary artery occlusions are common in coronary disease, with up to a quarter to a third of patients referred for coronary angiography reported to have coronary occlusions[1, 2]. Occluded coronary arteries are associated with high incidence of cardiac events[3–5]. The coronary arteries are interconnected by intramyocardial and epicardial collaterals[6, 7]. These preformed, small vessels have the potential to remodel and grow in response to ischemia, delivering blood by an alternative route to an ischemic territory[6, 7]. Coronary lesion severity, proximal lesion location, and duration of ischemia are major determinants for collateralization[8, 9]. Though collateral development starts early after the manifestation of ischemia, adequate collateralization may take several weeks. There is individual variability in the propensity to develop collaterals. Coronary collaterals may significantly mitigate the effects of severe stenoses or occlusions[10–12]. A recent meta-analysis demonstrated a 36% mortality reduction in patients with high collateralization compared with patients with low collateralization.
Traditionally, coronary occlusions and collaterals have been assessed using selective coronary angiography[1, 2, 6, 12]. Though transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTE) cannot give a complete and panoramic view of the coronary arteries and collateral vessels, various findings by TTE are shown to diagnose occlusions and collaterals with a high degree of accuracy[10, 13–18]. Using TTE, a coronary occlusion may be detected by demonstrating retrograde flow in the arterial trunk, left circumflex marginal branches (CxMb), or septal perforating branches[10, 13–17]. Enhanced flow in elongated epicardial or intramyocardial vessels has been shown to represent collateral flow to an occluded coronary artery[10, 18]. Finally, accelerated anterograde flow velocities in septal perforating branches have been proposed to indicate collateral flow to an occluded artery[17, 18]. However, these TTE studies are few, and most studies have in limited patient cohorts used only one or two parameters to detect coronary occlusions and collateral flow. Furthermore, anterograde flow velocities in septal perforators with collateral supply to occluded coronary arteries have not been extensively evaluated.
The purpose of our study was twofold. First, to assess whether anterograde flow velocities in septal perforating branches could identify an occluded contralateral coronary artery. Second, to assess the feasibility and accuracy of demonstrating occlusions in the three main coronary arteries by the combined use of several parameters, each of which indicates collateral flow. Coronary angiography was used as the reference for coronary occlusions.
Patients were included in the study if they fulfilled the following criteria: (1) already scheduled for coronary angiography because of documented or suspected stable or unstable coronary disease; (2) age above 18 years; (3) met no exclusion criteria. The exclusion criteria were: (1) previous aorto-coronary bypass surgery; (2) presumed insufficient acoustic windows because of severe emphysema or severe overweight; (3) significant valvular disease; (4) atrial fibrillation; (5) administrative reasons.
The study protocol was approved by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics and the Norwegian Data Inspectorate. All participants gave written, informed consent. (This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NTC00281346).
Baseline characteristics of the study cohort (n = 108)
No of subjects (%) mean ± SD
63.1 ± 9.5
Heart rate (beats/minute)
63 ± 7.4
26 ± 3.6
Total cholesterol (mmol/L)
4.9 ± 1.1
Blood pressure (mm Hg)
142 ± 20
82 ± 12
Hypertension (>140/90 mm Hg)
Organic nitrate, daily maintenance
Transthoracic coronary flow evaluation
Patients were examined using an Acuson Sequoia C512 (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc, Mountain View, CA) ultrasound system connected to standard 4V1C and 7V3C transthoracic transducers. Contrast agent was not used. The TTE examination was not performed earlier than the day after hospital admission and only after the patients were clinically stable. The coronary arteries were investigated by use of colour Doppler mapping with data postprocessing mix function, which makes the colours transparent, as described previously. The Nyquist limit of colour Doppler was set to 0.24 m/sec, but was actively changed to provide optimal images. The colour box size was reduced to maintain the high frame rate. Stop-motion frames and clips were digitally recorded for offline analysis.
The flow velocity waveform of septal perforators is predominantly diastolic, with a small systolic wave either in the same or opposite direction, or lacking[20, 21]. Measurements of systolic and mean diastolic flow velocities in the perforating vessels are significantly influenced by systolic cardiac motion and Doppler low velocity noise. Therefore, only peak diastolic flow velocities (pDV) were measured in these branches. When septal perforating branches demonstrated anterograde flow by colour Doppler (Figures 3A and B), their pDVs were measured using pulsed-wave Doppler with 1.75- to 3.5-Mhz frequency in a sample volume of 1.5 to 5 mm, with the sample volume positioned on the laminar colour flow Doppler signal (Figure 3C). We tried to find at least three consecutive cardiac cycles to average the flow velocities. Angle correction was used during velocity measurements to keep the angle between blood flow and Doppler beam as small as possible.
Coronary angiography was performed using standard techniques. All angiographic studies were digitally stored with later offline reviewing and analyses, blinded to the findings by TTE. Disagreements in interpretation were resolved by consensus between the two cardiologists responsible for the angiographic readings. All angiograms were classified according to left or right dominance. The severity of coronary stenoses in the LM and three major coronary arteries was determined by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). The angiograms were analyzed using a 16-segment model of the coronary arteries. Significant coronary disease was defined as diameter stenosis ≥ 50% in at least one main coronary artery. Each main coronary artery could have more than one stenosis, with the most severe lesion defining the degree of stenosis. Each coronary artery segment was categorized in one of the following four groups: (1) diameter stenosis 0% to 49%, (2) diameter stenosis 50% to 75% (borderline stenosis), (3) diameter stenosis 76% to 99% (high-grade stenosis), and (4) diameter stenosis 100% with focal absence of antegrade flow (occlusion). Coronary flow direction downstream to an occlusion was decided by following the coronary filling frame by frame. Collateral flow to occluded arteries was graded according to the Rentrop classification (grade 0 = no visible filling of any collateral channel, grade 1 = filling of side branches of the occluded artery, grade 2 = partial filling of the epicardial vessel, grade 3 = complete collateral filling of the epicardial vessel).
To assess interobserver measurement variability, two experienced observers (J.V. and E.H.) examined data from 12 random cases in a blinded manner. Intraobserver variability was similarly tested by one experienced observer (J.V.) two weeks apart, blinded to previous results. For the reproducibility studies, minimum two separate septal perforator flow velocity waveform recordings were selected for measurements in each patient. Both interobserver and intraobserver measurement variability were expressed as the mean difference in percentage and the coefficient of variation of the differences between the measurements for each parameter.
Continuous variables are presented as mean ± SD and categorical variables as fractions and percentages. Comparisons of mean values were performed using Student’s t tests for normally distributed parameters. Logistic regression analyses were used to explore relationships between the success rate for measurements of anterograde flow velocities in septal perforating branches and demographic and clinical variables, and to examine the different variables in predicting coronary occlusion, and confirmed by exact tests. Linear regression analyses were used to explore the relationships between anterograde flow velocities in septal perforating branches and baseline characteristics. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the optimal cutoff value of anterograde flow velocities in septal perforating vessels. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) to detect occlusion in the presence of at least one positive parameter indicating collateral flow were assessed using standard formulas. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed with SPSS for Windows version 20.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL).
There were 35 patients with and 73 patients without unstable coronary artery disease (Table 1). For stable patients, the mean time from echocardiographic examination to angiography was 24.7 ± 31.7 days. In the group with unstable coronary artery disease two patients had a postponed angiography due to unrelated comorbid conditions. The mean time from echocardiographic examination to angiography was 4.3 ± 3.4 days for the remaining 33 patients.
Findings by angiography and QCA in the main coronary arteries
Stenosis group 2
Stenosis group 3
Stenosis group 4
Blood flow direction in coronary trunk downstream to occlusion
(DS 50% – 75%)
(DS 76% – 99%)
(DS 100%; occlusion)
TTE in demonstrating occluded main arteries
TTE showed retrograde flow in two LADs and six RCA/PDAs. Coronary angiography confirmed retrograde flow in all these arteries, except in two PDAs where anterograde flow was seen. This discrepancy was probably due to misinterpretation of LAD running around the apex. The sensitivity and specificity for identifying occlusion in arteries with angiographic downstream retrograde flow were 30% and 99%, respectively. Analyses showed no statistical differences in TTE detection of retrograde flow in a coronary artery when adjusted for baseline characteristics of the study cohort, with the exception of reduced feasibility in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) (p = 0.02).
Retrograde flow was demonstrated by colour Doppler in Sb-LADs in five patients. Four of these patients had an upstream LAD occlusion, while one patient had an upstream high-grade LAD stenosis. Angiography showed, downstream to the four LAD occlusions, anterograde flow in three patients and retrograde flow in one patient. TTE showed retrograde flow in Sb-PDAs in 11 patients. RCA was occluded in proximal or mid segments in seven of these patients, while the remaining four patients showed upstream high-grade RCA stenoses. Retrograde flow in CxMb was found in one patient (Figures 2C and D), with angiography showing retrograde flow downstream to a mid Cx occlusion.
Anterograde peak diastolic flow velocities (pDV) in septal perforating branches in groups A – D
Group A (n = 11)
0.37 ± 0.13
Group B (n = 8)
0.46 ± 0.28
Group C (n = 14)
0.50 ± 0.24
Group D (n = 14)
0.80 ± 0.31
Excluding the septal collateral pathway, seven patients were identified by TTE having other intramyocardial or epicardial collaterals to occluded main coronary arteries. The most common finding was apically located epicardial and intramyocardial collaterals between the distal LAD and PDA (Figure 5A). Other findings were intramyocardial and epicardial free wall collaterals to myocardial territories originally supported by the LAD or Cx. These findings correctly identified the occluded coronary artery in all seven patients.
Findings of anterograde pDV ≥ 0.57 m/sec in septal branches, retrograde flow in a coronary artery or septal branch, or demonstration of other collaterals were all significantly related to angiographic occlusion (p < 0.001). The individual coronary occlusion could in our study be identified by at least one of the above mentioned TTE findings. Using these criteria, 25 of 28 coronary occlusions (89%) were correctly identified. Seven of eight LAD occlusions, two of four Cx occlusions, and all 16 RCA/PDA occlusions were correctly identified. Detecting at least one positive TTE parameter indicating occlusion had a sensitivity of 89%, specificity of 94%, PPV of 63%, and NPV of 99% for detection of coronary occlusion, as defined by angiography. Analyses showed no statistical differences in the degree of demonstrating collateral flow when adjusted for baseline characteristics of the study cohort, left or right dominance, Rentrop collateral flow, or clinical presentation. Seven arteries with high-grade stenosis demonstrated collateral flow to the artery downstream to the lesion (pDV ≥ 0.57 m/sec or retrograde flow in septal perforating branches). With the combined use of several TTE parameters indicating a coronary occlusion, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for detecting either an occlusion or a high-grade stenosis were 52%, 97%, 82%, and 88%, respectively.
There was no significant difference in mean pDV value between the observers. The biases for pDV were 2.0% for intraobserver (p = 0.14) and 2.3% for interobserver measurements (p = 0.11). The intraobserver and interobserver coefficients of variation for pDV were 3.9% and 4.3%, respectively.
In this study of patients with suspected or definitive coronary artery disease, the feasibility and accuracy of diagnosing occlusions in the three main coronary arteries by use of transthoracic echocardiographic findings of collateral flow were examined and compared with findings at angiography. The main results were that (1) anterograde peak diastolic flow velocities (pDV) ≥ 0.57 m/sec in septal perforating vessels predicted contralateral coronary occlusion; (2) the combined use of several parameters indicating collateral flow identified 25 of 28 main coronary occlusions; (3) with TTE supplemental information may be obtained of the complex pathophysiology in patients with coronary occlusions.
We found significantly higher anterograde flow velocities in septal perforating branches in patients with contralateral coronary occlusion compared with corresponding velocities in patients without significant coronary disease (Table 3). In patients without coronary disease, other investigators have found pDV at 0.41 ± 0.13 m/sec, which is in agreement with our findings. Normally, a coronary vessel will dilate as an adaption to increased flow. It is anticipated that septal perforators with increased flow after achieving collateral function may not be capable of sufficient dilatation, possibly because of restraint from septal myocardium. This, in turn, leads to increased septal blood flow velocities to maintain the collateral function. A similar mechanism has been proposed to explain the increased flow velocities in septal perforators in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. In our study, the optimal pDV cutoff value ≥ 0.57 m/sec showed high sensitivity (79%) and moderate specificity (69%) for detection of coronary occlusion in the contralateral artery (Figure 6). Peak DV above the cutoff value also identified high-grade stenoses in the contralateral artery in some cases, and pDV ≥ 0.57 m/sec for detecting either coronary occlusion or high-grade stenosis in the contralateral artery had a sensitivity of 68%. To the best of our knowledge, our TTE study is the first to use a pDV cutoff value to identify coronary occlusions. However, this cutoff value needs to be tested in a separate study population.
Several investigators have shown that more coronary occlusions were detected when using two or even three parameters for identifying collateral flow compared to using only a single parameter[14–16]. By the combined use in our study of several parameters indicating collateral flow, we were able to correctly identify nearly all coronary occlusions. In accordance with findings in other studies[11, 12], several high-grade stenoses in our study demonstrated collateral flow to jeopardized myocardium downstream to the lesion, illustrating the similar pathophysiology induced by high-grade stenoses and total occlusions. This explains that findings of collateral flow in our study showed moderate PPV (63%) for detection of coronary occlusion but high PPV (82%) for detecting either coronary occlusion or high-grade stenosis. In patients with ACS and an occluded culprit artery the time interval from the occlusion to the TTE investigation was short. This may have affected our results due to the time dependence of the collateral circulation to develop.
TTE correctly demonstrated retrograde flow in the coronary trunk in six of the twenty arteries with retrograde flow on coronary angiography, in two LADs and four PDAs. All six cases showed Rentrop class ≥ 2 collateral circulation. The sensitivity and specificity of diagnosing retrograde flow in main artery trunks were 30% and 99%, respectively, while other investigators have reported sensitivity and specificity of 70% to 100% and 96% to 100%, respectively[13–16]. The higher sensitivity in other studies may be because contrast agent was used to enhance Doppler signals and patients with ACS were not examined. In our study, a significant proportion of occluded coronary arteries showed collateral-dependent anterograde flow distal to the occlusion, a finding that has also been reported by other investigators. Occluded coronary arteries with anterograde flow downstream to the occlusion will not be identified by only searching for retrograde flow in the main artery.
Retrograde blood supply through septal perforating branches was demonstrated in four of eight (50%) and seven of sixteen patients (44%) with occluded LADs and RCAs, respectively. In other TTE studies, reversed septal blood flow was demonstrated in 26% to 50% and 17% to 39% of patients with occluded LAD and RCA, respectively[14–16]. Collateral growth is also stimulated to support jeopardized myocardium downstream to severe stenoses or sub-total occlusions[11, 12]. This probably explains our findings of five patients with high-grade stenosis in the LAD or RCA showing reversed flow in septal perforating branches.
In this study, finding epicardial and intramyocardial collaterals in the apex and free walls correctly identified coronary occlusions. Demonstration of free wall collaterals may be of special importance for diagnosing Cx occlusions because collateral flow to the Cx territory may be less using the intraseptal pathway.
The results from our TTE study indicate that findings of elevated anterograde flow velocities in septal perforators and the combined use of several parameters indicating collateral flow are valuable methods for identifying coronary occlusions, with the possibility of identifying most of these occlusions using several parameters. Our study also demonstrates the heterogeneity and complexity of coronary flow physiology that may occur in patients with coronary occlusions. In our experience, the TTE examination for coronary occlusions takes 15 to 20 minutes.
There are several limitations in our study. Because of longer distance to the echocardiographic probe, the Cx, CxMbs, RCA/PDA, and septal branches from PDA were more difficult to visualize than the LAD and its septal branches. The use of ultrasound contrast agent might have improved the feasibility of demonstrating collateral and retrograde flow[14, 15]. Because of limited clinical experience in patients with ACS, we chose not to use ultrasound contrast when planning this study. The response in pDV is probably not binary (normal or abnormal) or absolute for the pDV cutoff value of ≥ 0.57 m/sec, implying that pDV measurements slightly below or above the cutoff value might give uncertain estimates of coronary occlusion. Future studies with larger patient cohorts may possibly refine our proposed pDV cutoff value. Finally, we cannot exclude selection bias, because our study cohort included only patients planned for coronary angiography and excluded those with previous coronary artery bypass surgery, presumed insufficient acoustic windows, significant valvular disease, or atrial fibrillation.
We found that an anterograde peak diastolic flow velocity of ≥ 0.57 m/sec in septal perforating branches showed high ability to identify occlusion in the contralateral main coronary artery. With the combined use of several parameters indicating collateral flow, we were able to identify the majority of coronary occlusions in our patient cohort. Moreover, investigating collateral flow can give further insight into the complex coronary flow physiology that may result from coronary artery occlusions.
The study was funded by grants from Sunnmore Health Trust Research Fund and Helse Midt-Norge Regional Health Trust Research Fund.
- Christofferson RD, Lehmann KG, Martin GV, Every N, Caldwell JH, Kapadia SR: Effect of chronic total coronary occlusion on treatment strategy. Am J Cardiol. 2005, 95: 1088-1091. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.12.065View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kahn JK: Angiographic suitability for catheter revascularization of total coronary occlusions in patients from a community hospital setting. Am Heart J. 1993, 126: 561-564. 10.1016/0002-8703(93)90404-WView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Puma PA, Sketch MH, Tcheng JE, Gardner LH, Nelson CL, Phillips HR, Stack RS, Califf RM: The natural history of single-vessel chronic coronary occlusion: a 25-year experience. Am Heart J. 1997, 133: 393-399. 10.1016/S0002-8703(97)70179-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Trappe HJ, Lichtlen PR, Klein H, Wenzlaff P, Hartwig CA: Natural history of single vessel disease. Risk of sudden coronary death in relation to coronary anatomy and arrhythmia profile. Eur Heart J. 1989, 10: 512-524.Google Scholar
- van der Schaaf RJ, Vis MM, Sjauw KD, Koch KT, Baan J, Tijssen JGP, de Winter RJ, Piek JJ, Henriques JPS: Impact of multivessel coronary disease on long-term mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction is due to the presence of a chronic total occlusion. Am J Cardiol. 2006, 98: 1165-1169. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.06.010View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meier P, Hemingway H, Lansky AJ, Knapp G, Pitt B, Seiler C: The impact of the coronary collateral circulation on mortality: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2011, 33: 614-621.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meier P, Seiler C: The coronary collateral circulation - clinical relevances and therapeutic options. Heart. 2013, 99: 897-898. 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-303426View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Piek JJ, van Liebergen RAM, Koch KT, Peters RJG, David GK: Clinical, angiographic and hemodynamic predictors of recruitable collateral flow assessed during balloon angioplasty coronary occlusion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997, 29: 275-282. 10.1016/S0735-1097(96)00499-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mills JD, Fischer D, Villanueva FS: Coronary collateral development during chronic ischemia: serial assessment using harmonic myocardial contrast echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000, 36: 618-624. 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00739-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pizzuto F, Voci P, Puddu PE, Chiricolo G, Borzi M, Romeo F: Functional assessment of the collateral-dependent circulation in chronic total coronary occlusion using transthoracic Doppler ultrasound and venous adenosine infusion. Am J Cardiol. 2006, 98: 197-203. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.01.075View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rigo P, Becker LC, Griffith LSC, Alderson PO, Bailey IK, Pitt B, Burow RD, Wagner HN: Influence of coronary collateral vessels on the results of thallium-201 myocardial stress imaging. Am J Cardiol. 1979, 44: 452-458. 10.1016/0002-9149(79)90396-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Levin DC: Pathways and functional significance of the coronary collateral circulation. Circulation. 1974, 50: 831-837. 10.1161/01.CIR.50.4.831View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Watanabe N, Akasaka T, Yamaura Y, Akiyama M, Koyama Y, Kamiyama N, Neishi Y, Kaji S, Saito Y, Yoshida K: Noninvasive detection of total occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001, 38: 1328-1332. 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01556-XView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hirata K, Watanabe H, Hozumi T, Tokai K, Otsuka R, Fujimoto K, Shimada K, Muro T, Yoshiyama M, Yoshikawa J: Simple detection of occluded coronary artery using retrograde flow in septal branch and left anterior descending coronary artery by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography at rest. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004, 17: 108-113. 10.1016/j.echo.2003.09.019View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Otsuka R, Watanabe H, Hirata K, Tokai K, Muro T, Hozumi T, Yoshiyama M, Yoshikawa J: A novel technique to detect total occlusion in the right coronary artery using retrograde flow by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005, 18: 704-709. 10.1016/j.echo.2004.11.018View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boshchenko AA, Vrublevsky AV, Karpov RS: Transthoracic echocardiography in the detection of chronic total coronary artery occlusion. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009, 10: 62-68. 10.1093/ejechocard/jen159View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Saraste M, Vesalainen RK, Ylitalo A, Saraste A, Koskenvuo JW, Toikka JO, Vaittinen M-A, Hartiala JJ, Airaksinen KEJ: Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography as a non-invasive tool to assess coronary artery stenoses - a comparison with quantitative coronary angiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005, 18: 679-685. 10.1016/j.echo.2004.09.016View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Anjaneyulu A, Johann C, Raghava RP, Kumar DN, Sridevi C, Soma RB, Krishnam RP, Rajagopala RA: Coronary collaterals by transthoracic echocardiography in coronary artery disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004, 17: 466-469. 10.1016/j.echo.2003.12.019View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vegsundvåg J, Holte E, Wiseth R, Hegbom K, Hole T: Transthoracic echocardiography for imaging of the different coronary artery segments: a feasibility study. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2009, 7: 8- 10.1186/1476-7120-7-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chilian WM, Marcus ML: Effects of coronary and extravascular pressure on intramyocardial and epicardial blood velocity. Am J Physiol. 1984, 248: H170-H178.Google Scholar
- Youn HJ, Redberg RF, Schiller NB, Foster E: Demonstration of penetrating intramyocardial coronary arteries with high-frequency transthoracic echocardiography and Doppler in human subjects. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1999, 12: 55-63. 10.1016/S0894-7317(99)70173-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL, Griffith LS, McGoon DC, Murphy ML, Roe BB: A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1975, 51 (suppl): 5-40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rentrop KP, Cohen M, Blanke H, Phillips RA: Changes in collateral channel filling immediately after controlled coronary artery occlusion by an angioplasty balloon in human subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985, 5: 587-592. 10.1016/S0735-1097(85)80380-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sherrrid MV, Mahenthiran J, Casteneda V, Fincke R, Gasser M, Barac I, Thayaparan R, Chaudhry FA: Comparison of diastolic septal perforator flow velocities in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy versus hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cardiol. 2006, 97: 106-112. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.07.128View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.