- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Effects of cognac on coronary flow reserve and plasma antioxidant status in healthy young men
© Kiviniemi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 25 March 2008
Accepted: 03 June 2008
Published: 03 June 2008
The cardioprotective effects of certain alcoholic beverages are partly related to their polyphenol content, which may improve the vasodilatory reactivity of arteries. Effect of cognac on coronary circulation, however, remains unknown. The purpose of this randomized controlled cross-over study was to determine whether moderate doses of cognac improve coronary reactivity as assessed with cold pressor testing (CPT) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) measument.
Study group consisted of 23 subjects. Coronary flow velocity and epicardial diameter was assessed using transthoracic echocardiography at rest, during CPT and adenosine infusion-derived CFR measurements before drinking, after a moderate (1.2 ± 0.1 dl) and an escalating high dose (total amount 2.4 ± 0.3 dl) of cognac. To explore the bioavailability of antioxidants, the antioxidant contents of cognac was measured and the absorption from the digestive tract was verified by plasma antioxidant capacity determination.
Serum alcohol levels increased to 1.2 ± 0.2‰ and plasma antioxidant capacity from 301 ± 43.9 μmol/l to 320 ± 25.0 μmol/l by 7.6 ± 11.8%, (p = 0.01) after high doses of cognac. There was no significant change in flow velocity during CPT after cognac ingestion compared to control day. CFR was 4.4 ± 0.8, 4.1 ± 0.9 (p = NS), and 4.5 ± 1.2 (p = NS) before drinking and after moderate and high doses on cognac day, and 4.5 ± 1.4, and 4.0 ± 1.2 (p = NS) on control day.
Cognac increased plasma antioxidant capacity, but it had no effect on coronary circulation in healthy young men.
Moderate consumption of alcohol is associated with reduced coronary artery disease mortality [1, 2]. The cardioprotective effects of alcoholic beverages are partly related to their polyphenol content, which may be associated with improved vasodilatory reactivity of arteries [3, 4]. A moderate (ethanol 0.5 g/kg)  and a high dose of red wine (ethanol 1.0 g/kg) has been shown to increase coronary flow reserve (CFR), but pure vodka and white wine had not such effect . The effects of cognac on coronary circulation, however, have not been evaluated, although many elderly patients with coronary artery disease drink habitually cognac to releave cardiac symptoms.
The beneficial endothelial effects of polyphenol containing beverages, such as red wine, have been attributed to both ethanol and antioxidative polyphenols [6, 7]. However, their relative contributions in vivo remain to be established. Cognac is known to contain polyphenols , but the bioavailability of the antioxidant content of cognac has not been previously addressed.
Cold pressor test (CPT) and CFR measurements are widely used methods to study coronary circulation [9–11]. Impairment of coronary artery reactivity as shown by insufficient vasodilation, or vasoconstriction in CPT, or decreased CFR occurs in various cardiovascular diseases, such as hypertension , diabetes , hypercholesterolemia , coronary artery disease , and even in otherwise healthy subjects with increasing waist to hip ratio . Abnormal response in these tests is related to impairment in coronary vascular smooth muscle or endothelial function or both .
The purpose of this randomized controlled cross-over study was to determine with transthoracic echocardiography whether cognac ingested in moderate or high doses improve coronary vasodilatory responses in healthy humans. We also studied the bioavailability of antioxidants by determining the plasma antioxidant capacity.
Subjects and study protocol
The study included 23 healthy, non-smoking Finnish men (mean age 23 ± 1.8 years, body mass index 24 ± 2.3 kg/m2, total cholesterol 4.2 ± 0.8 mmol/l, HDL cholesterol 1.6 ± 0.41 mmol/l, LDL cholesterol 2.3 ± 0.65 mmol/l, triglycerides 0.77 ± 0.21 mmol/l and plasma glucose 5.0 ± 0.46 mmol/l). None of the subjects were taking any medication. The study was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (2000) of the World Medical Association and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Southwest Finland Health Care District. All subjects gave their written informed consent. We calculated sample size of 16 subjects with a known SD of 1.0 (for CFR) and an assumed difference of 1.0 between the interventions (α = 0.05, β = 0.80). To deal with the loss of data during the analysis, we enrolled 23 subjects.
The concentration of phenolic substances of the study cognac (Remy Martin VSOP, France) was determined according to the Folin-Ciocalteau method  (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). The total amount of phenolic substances given to the subjects was 100 mg ± 10 mg, including Ellagic acid 2.51 ± 0.28 mg, Hydroxybenzoic acid 0.70 ± 0.09 mg, Procyanidines (oligomers) 0.48 ± 0.06 mg, Hydroxycinnamic acids 0.12 ± 0.02 mg. In addition, the ability of the cognac to act as free radical scavengers against 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical (Extrasynthèse, Genay, France) was tested spectrophotometrically . The free radical scavenger capacitiy of the cognac was 7.0 ± 2.7%.
All study data were stored in a digital workstation and analyzed offline in random order by an investigator blinded to the information of the day or the dose. In some studies, image quality was insufficient for analysis, and therefore, complete data could be recorded in 108/115 (94%) and 111/115 (97%) studies for CPT and CFR, respectively.
Cold pressor test and CFR measurement
Baseline values were detected as an average of three separate diameter and three flow velocity measurements. After the baseline measurements, the subjects' right hand was placed into ice-cold water for 120 s. During the hand immersion, both diameter and flow velocity were measured in turn continuously. Epicardial coronary artery diameter during the CPT is expressed as an average of the measurements between 30 and 180 s and flow velocity as an average of the measurements between 10 and 150 s after placing the hand into the cold water. Minimum of three measurements was used. After hand immersion, there was at least 7 minutes interval before adenosine infusion. Intravenous adenosine (adenosin item 5 mg/ml, Item Development AB, Sweden) was infused at a rate of 0.14 mg/kg/min for 5 min and diameters and flow velocities were measured in turn continuously during the infusion. The results of the measurements are expressed as an average of three separate maximum diameter and flow velocity measurements.
Venous blood samples were obtained for measurement of total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol and triglyceride and glucose levels before the study. Serum ethanol concentrations were determined after the high dose of cognac using a standard photometric test (Modular P800, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). The antioxidative capacity of EDTA plasma was measured using a commercially available colorimetric assay kit (ImAnOx, Immundiagnostik, Bensheim, Germany) before drinking and after the high dose of cognac. The assay was done and results calculated according to the manufacturer's instructions. The lower detection limit of the assay was 130 μmol/l. The intra-assay coefficients of variation were 0.9% and 2.3% and the inter-assay coefficients were 1.63% and 2.43% for low and high levels, respectively. Optical density was determined using the Multiskan Ascent spectrophotometer at 450 nm (Thermo Labsystems, Helsinki, Finland). All samples were collected and stored in a similar manner and analyzed in randomized order.
The data are presented as means ± SD. ANOVA for repeated measurements was used to assess differences of CPT and CFR between the doses. P-values indicating trend were calculated using the repeated measures regression analysis. A paired T-test was used to compare plasma antioxidant levels before and after beverage ingestion. The association of antioxidant capacity levels to CPT and CFR measurements was tested assessing the Pearson correlation coefficient between the differences in antioxidant capacity levels and the differences in CFR before and after drinking the beverages. P-values lower than 0.05 were considered significant. The statistical analyses were done using the Statistical Analysis System, SAS.
CPT and CFR
Effects of cognac on mean diastolic velocity (MDV) and epicardial diameter of the LAD
Cognac (n = 18)
0.20 ± 0.05
0.23 ± 0.07
0.85 ± 0.17
0.24 ± 0.07
0.25 ± 0.08
0.93 ± 0.20
0.22 ± 0.07
0.24 ± 0.08
0.91 ± 0.18
1.1 ± 0.4
1.2 ± 0.3
1.4 ± 0.4
1.1 ± 0.3
1.2 ± 0.3
1.4 ± 0.4
1.1 ± 0.3
1.1 ± 0.3
1.4 ± 0.4
Control (n = 16)
0.21 ± 0.05
0.26 ± 0.06
0.93 ± 0.21
0.24 ± 0.06
0.29 ± 0.07
1.0 ± 0.25
1.1 ± 0.3
1.2 ± 0.3
1.4 ± 0.3
1.1 ± 0.2
1.2 ± 0.2
1.5 ± 0.3
Effects of cognac on coronary flow velocity during CPT (hyperemia to baseline ratio) and coronary flow velocity reserve (CFR) in the LAD
Before drinking vs. Moderate dose
Before drinking vs High dose
1.21 ± 0.26
-0.12 (-0.29 – 0.06) NS
-0.03 (-0.19 – 0.13) NS
P = 0.91
N = 18
4.4 ± 0.8
-0.29 (-0.83 – 0.24) NS
0.15 (-0.39 – 0.68) NS
P = 0.71
1.23 ± 0.20
0.01 (-0.10 – 0.13) NS
P = 0.64
N = 16
4.5 ± 1.0
-0.45 (-0.99 – 0.09) NS
P = 0.85
Plasma antioxidant capacity increased from 301 ± 43.9 μmol/l to 320 ± 25.0 μmol/l by 7.6 ± 11.8%, (p = 0.01) after cognac. Serum alcohol levels increased to 1.2 ± 0.2‰ after the full doses of cognac. There were no significant association between the increase of plasma antioxidant capacity and coronary microcirculatory or epicardial vasodilation during CPT or CFR measurements.
We determined the effects of cognac on coronary reactivity, because epidemiological studies have indicated that any alcohol containing beverage may be beneficial for the heart . In addition, many elderly patients with coronary artery disease use cognac to releave cardiac symptoms. It appeared that cognac had no effect on coronary reactivity in healthy young men, but it increased plasma antioxidant capacity. Furthermore, we found no association between the increase of plasma antioxidant capacity and coronary microcirculatory or epicardial vasodilation during CPT or CFR measurements.
Non-significant changes in CPT and CFR measurements reflect that cognac has no effect on coronary reactivity. Cognac contains antioxidative polyphenols, although in much smaller quantities than red wine , which is known to improve CFR [3, 5]. In a recent in vitro study, the authors found that cognac induced vasodilation in the rat aorta . Moreover, polyphenols from cognac are able to directly increase NO production without affecting O2 - and to enhance the capacity of bradykinin to produce NO in human endothelial cells . We could not verify these findings in vivo in human coronary arteries. This can probably be explained by the low polyphenol content of cognac, which is insufficient to improve the reactivity to CPT or CFR. Moreover, cognac may contain too low levels of certain polyphenol subgroups, which are related to improvement vasodilatory reactivity. For example, oligomeric procyanidins of red wine have been shown to reduce vasoconstrictor endothelin-1 production in vitro . Other polyphenol groups mediating improving vascular reactivity in vitro may include resveratrol, quercetin, and catechins . It is also possible that the changes after cognac ingestion may be very small and, therefore, undetectable by the measurements. However, the variability of CPT or CFR measurements was moderate with low intraobserver variability and greater physiological variation. On the other hand, ethanol may blunt the vasodilatory effects cognac polyphenols .
We tested coronary vasodilatory responses by two distinct tests: CPT and CFR measurements. CPT is used as a physiological measure to assess coronary reactivity. In the CPT, the subject's hand or foot is placed in ice water, which produces a pain sensation. Nociception induces sympathetic stimulation and release of adrenalin and noradrenalin from the adrenal medulla [27–29], which increase heart rate, arterial blood pressure and myocardial oxygen demand. Increase in myocardial oxygen demand increases coronary blood flow. Moreover, sympathetic stimulation of α-adrenergic-receptors in the endothelium leads to the release of NO, which facilitates vasodilation of the resistance arteries . Vasodilation of the resistance arteries increases blood flow in the conductance arteries as well, secondarily leading to vasodilation of the epicardial arteries by shear stress, despite α-adrenergic-mediated constriction of smooth muscle cells. In the normal heart, the net effect is vasodilation and increased coronary blood flow. In patients with endothelial dysfunction, a disturbance in vasodilator mechanisms leads to insufficient vasodilation, or vasoconstriction. CFR is defined as a ratio of coronary blood flow during maximal pharmacologically-induced vasodilation to baseline blood flow. Adenosine infusion is used to measure CFR, due to its capability to induce the maximal dilation of small coronary arteries. Secondarily, adenosine increases flow velocity in the epicardial arteries, also leading to flow-mediated vasodilation. Impairment of coronary artery reactivity as shown by decreased CFR occurs in various cardiovascular diseases, such as hypertension , diabetes , hypercholesterolemia  and coronary artery disease , and may be due to impairment in vascular smooth muscle or endothelial function or both.
Transthoracic echocardiography is a widely used non-invasive bedside method for assessing CPT and CFR responses and it correlates with invasive measurements using a Doppler guide wire  and myocardial blood flow quantified with PET . This was the first time that changes in both coronary flow velocity and epicardial coronary artery diameter were measured simultaneously in a clinical trial using transthoracic echocardiography.
Some limitations of the present study should be pointed out. First, we studied young men only. However, as the purpose of the study was to determine the acute effects of cognac on coronary reactivity and plasma antioxidative capacity, using a homogenous sample may have diminished the role of confounding factors. Moreover, atherosclerotic processes begin early in life, and the attenuation of vasodilatory responses may be one of their early signs. Therefore, it makes sense to study subjects in this age group. Secondly, we saw marked variation in CFR (range 2.3 – 7.8) and moderate variability in totally reproduced CFR studies (CV 11.5 ± 8.7%), but intra-observer variability was low (2.6 ± 4.0%) indicating a small methodological error and greater physiological variation.
In conclusion, despite an improvement in plasma antioxidant capacity, cognac has no significant effect on coronary reactivity.
This study was supported by The Turku University Hospital Research foundation, the Tampere University Hospital Medical Fund, the Turku University Foundation, the Emil Aaltonen Foundation, the Orionpharma Research Foundation, the Instrumentarium Research Foundation, the Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research and the Paulo Foundation.
- Gronbaek M, Becker U, Johansen D, Gottschau A, Schnohr P, Hein HO, Jensen G, Sorensen TIA: Type of alcohol consumed and mortality from all causes, coronary heart disease, and cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2000, 133: 411-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Klatsky AL, Friedman GD, Armstrong MA, Kipp H: Wine, liquor, beer, and mortality. Am J Epidemiol. 2003, 158: 585-95. 10.1093/aje/kwg184View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shimada K, Watanabe H, Hosoda K, Takeuchi K, Yoshikawa J: Effect of red wine on coronary flow-velocity reserve. Lancet. 1999, 354: 1002- 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)03478-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Agewall S, Wright S, Doughty RN, Whalley GA, Duxbury M, Sharpe N: Does a glass of red wine improve endothelial function?. Eur Heart J. 2000, 21: 74-8. 10.1053/euhj.1999.1759View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kiviniemi TO, Saraste A, Toikka JO, Saraste M, Raitakari OT, Pärkkä JP, Lehtimäki T, Hartiala JJ, Viikari J, Koskenvuo JW: A moderate dose of red wine, but not de-alcoholized red wine increases coronary flow reserve. Atherosclerosis. 2007, 195: e176-81. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.06.004View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Venkov CD, Myers PR, Tanner MA, Su M, Vaughan DE: Ethanol increases endothelial nitric oxide production through modulation of nitric oxide synthase expression. Thromb Haemost. 1999, 81: 638-42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zenebe W, Pechanova O, Andriantsitohaina R: Red wine polyphenols induce vasorelaxation by increased nitric oxide bioactivity. Physiological Research. 2003, 52: 425-32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ranaivo HR, Diebolt M, Schott C, Andriantsitohaina R: Polyphenolic compounds from Cognac induce vasorelaxation in vitro and decrease post-ischaemic cardiac infarction after an oral administration. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2004, 18: 331-8. 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2004.00243.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kiviniemi TO: Assessment of coronary blood flow and the reactivity of the microcirculation non-invasively with transthoracic echocardiography. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2008, 28: 145-155. 10.1111/j.1475-097X.2008.00794.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rigo F: Coronary flow reserve in stress-echo lab. From pathophysiologic toy to diagnostic tool. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2005, 3: 8- 10.1186/1476-7120-3-8View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Rigo F, Murer B, Ossena G, Favaretto E: Transthoracic echocardiographic imaging of coronary arteries: tips, traps, and pitfalls. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2008, 6: 7- 10.1186/1476-7120-6-7View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Antony I, Nitenberg A: Coronary endothelial dysfunction in hypertension. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1997, 90: 21-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nitenberg A, Ledoux S, Valensi P, Sachs R, Attali JR, Antony I: Impairment of coronary microvascular dilation in response to cold pressor – induced sympathetic stimulation in type 2 diabetic patients with abnormal stress thallium imaging. Diabetes. 2001, 50: 1180-5. 10.2337/diabetes.50.5.1180View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pitkänen OP, Raitakari OT, Niinikoski H, Nuutila P, Iida H, Voipio-Pulkki LM, Härkönen R, Wegelius U, Rönnemaa T, Viikari J, Knuuti J: Coronary flow reserve is impaired in young men with familial hypercholesterolemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996, 28: 1705-11. 10.1016/S0735-1097(96)00376-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zeiher AM, Schachinger V, Weitzel SH, Wollschlager H, Just H: Intracoronary Thrombus Formation Causes Focal Vasoconstriction of Epicardial Arteries in Patients with Coronary-Artery Disease. Circulation. 1991, 83: 1519-25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kiviniemi TO, Snapir A, Saraste M, Toikka JO, Raitakari OT, Ahotupa M, Hartiala JJ, Scheinin M, Koskenvuo JW: Determinants of coronary flow velocity reserve in healthy young men. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006, 291: H564-9. 10.1152/ajpheart.00915.2005View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- , : Folin-Ciocalteau-Index. Official Journal of European Communities. 1992, 178-9.Google Scholar
- Kähkönen MP, Heinonen M: Antioxidant activity of anthocyanins and their aglycons. J Agric Food Chem. 2003, 51: 628-33. 10.1021/jf025551iView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Saraste M, Koskenvuo JW, Knuuti J, Toikka JO, Laine H, Niemi P, Sakuma H, Hartiala JJ: Coronary flow reserve: measurement with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography is reproducible and comparable with positron emission tomography. Clin Physiol. 2001, 21: 114-22. 10.1046/j.1365-2281.2001.00296.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kiviniemi TO, Saraste M, Koskenvuo JW, Airaksinen KEJ, Toikka JO, Saraste A, Pärkkä JP, Hartiala JJ: Coronary artery diameter can be assessed reliably with transthoracic echocardiography. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004, 286: H1515-20. 10.1152/ajpheart.00819.2003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kiviniemi TO, Toikka JO, Koskenvuo JW, Saraste A, Saraste M, Pärkkä JP, Raitakari OT, Hartiala JJ: Vasodilation of epicardial coronary artery can be measured with transthoracic echocardiography. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007, 33: 362-70. 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.08.012View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goldberg DM, Hoffman B, Yang J, Soleas GJ: Phenolic constituents, furans, and total antioxidant status of distilled spirits. J Agric Food Chem. 1999, 47: 3978-85. 10.1021/jf9811626View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Diallo A, Sarr M, Mostefai H, Carusio N, Pricci M, Andiantsitohaina R: Cognac polyphenolic compounds increase bradykinin-induced nitric oxide production in endothelial cells. Physiol Res. 2007Google Scholar
- Corder R, Mullen W, Khan NQ, Marks SC, Wood EG, Carrier MJ, Crozier A: Oenology: red wine procyanidins and vascular health. Nature. 2006, 444: 566- 10.1038/444566aView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Szmitko PE, Verma S: Antiatherogenic potential of red wine: clinician update. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005, 288: H2023-30. 10.1152/ajpheart.00868.2004View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Puddey IB, Zilkens RR, Croft KD, Beilin LJ: Alcohol and endothelial function: A brief review. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2001, 28 (12): 1020-4. 10.1046/j.1440-1681.2001.03572.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Macho P, Hintze TH, Vatner SF: Regulation of Large Coronary-Arteries by Increases in Myocardial Metabolic Demands in Conscious Dogs. Circ Res. 1981, 49: 594-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nabel EG, Ganz P, Gordon JB, Alexander RW, Selwyn AP: Dilation of normal and constriction of atherosclerotic coronary arteries caused by the cold pressor test. Circulation. 1988, 77: 43-52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Robertson D, Johnson GA, Robertson RM, Nies AS, Shand DG, Oates JA: Comparative-Assessment of Stimuli That Release Neuronal and Adrenomedullary Catecholamines in Man. Circulation. 1979, 59: 637-43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Furchgott RF, Carvalho MH, Khan MT, Matsunaga K: Evidence for Endothelium-Dependent Vasodilation of Resistance Vessels by Acetylcholine. Blood Vessels. 1987, 24: 145-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Caiati C, Montaldo C, Zedda N, Montisci R, Ruscazio M, Lai G, Cadeddu M, Meloni L, Iliceto S: Validation of a new noninvasive method (contrast-enhanced transthoracic second harmonic echo Doppler) for the evaluation of coronary flow reserve: comparison with intracoronary Doppler flow wire. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999, 34: 1193-200. 10.1016/S0735-1097(99)00342-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.