- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Echo-Doppler–derived indexes of ventricular stiffness and ventriculo-arterial interaction as predictors of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure
© Yoon et al. 2016
- Received: 24 November 2015
- Accepted: 29 January 2016
- Published: 4 February 2016
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in patients with heart failure (HF) and worsens their prognosis. Vulnerability to changes in loading is an important factor in the development of AF and is strongly influenced by ventricular stiffness and ventriculo-arterial interaction. The aim of this study was to investigate predictors of AF development in patients with HF.
We studied 349 patients with stable HF. The following parameters of ventricular stiffness and ventriculo-arterial interaction were derived from echo-Doppler measurements: left ventricular (LV) diastolic elastance (Ed), effective arterial elastance (Ea), LV end-systolic elastance (Ees) and ventricular–vascular coupling index (VVI).
AF occurred in 57 (16.3 %) patients over a median follow up of 30.3 months. Echo-Doppler–derived parameters of ventricular stiffness and ventriculo-arterial interaction were closely associated with HF severity. Ed was independently associated with AF after adjustment for age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and left atrial volume index (hazard ratio [HR] 5.49, p = 0.018). Ea and VVI were also associated with new-onset AF (HR 1.66, p = 0.027, and HR 1.06, p = 0.001, respectively).
Echo-Doppler indexes of ventricular stiffness are closely associated with HF severity. LV diastolic elastance (Ed) is the strongest predictor of new-onset AF in HF patients.
- Left ventricular stiffness
- Atrial fibrillation
- Heart failure
- Diastolic dysfunction
Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) each affect 1–2 % of the general population and the prevalence of both increases with age [1, 2]. AF is the most common sustained arrhythmia and occurs in 15 to 30 % of patients with HF [3, 4]. Since AF is a marker of increased cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in patients with HF [5, 6], it is important to investigate the predictors of AF occurrence in these patients. The development of AF in HF appears to be a multifactorial process, involving structural and neurohormonal processes and electrical remodeling . The heart’s vulnerability to changes in loading affects the prognosis of HF and the development of AF. As this vulnerability is affected by ventricular stiffness and ventriculo-arterial interaction [8, 9], it is reasonable to hypothesize that those factors are closely associated with the development of AF. However, the relationship has still not been determined in HF patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate indexes of ventricular stiffness and ventriculo-arterial interaction as predictors for the development of AF in patients with HF.
We retrospectively investigated 349 consecutive patients (238 men; age 62 ± 15 years) with stable HF with normal sinus rhythm who had undergone echocardiography between January 2007 and December 2008 in our institution. Reduced left ventricular (LV) contractility was defined as either a reduced ejection fraction (EF) (EF < 40 %) or a borderline EF (40 % ≤ EF < 50 %), based on two-dimensional echocardiography . Exclusion criteria were (1) muscular dystrophy, (2) more than moderate valvular disease, (3) previously documented AF or atrial flutter on the electrocardiogram (ECG) or Holter monitoring, (4) significant lung disease and (5) a New York Heart Association functional classification III or IV.
We reviewed medical history, physical examinations, laboratory tests, medication records, chest radiographs, 12-lead ECG, and echocardiography findings in all patients. We followed the study population for the development of AF via a review of their medical records. New-onset AF was defined as the first episode of paroxysmal or persistent AF, as documented by resting ECG or 24-h Holter monitoring, during the follow-up period. When the patient presented symptoms such as palpitations or dizziness, 24-h Holter monitoring was performed. Paroxysmal AF was defined as AF that terminated spontaneously within seven days, and persistent AF as continuous AF that was sustained beyond seven days . Study protocols were approved by our institutional review board, and informed consent from patients was waived due to retrospective nature of the study.
Two-dimensional, pulsed-Doppler, and tissue-Doppler echocardiographic examinations were performed using an appropriate ultrasound device (Sonos 7500, Philips, or Vivid 7, GE healthcare). Standard 2-dimensional measurements—LV diastolic and systolic dimension, ventricular septum and posterior wall thicknesses, left atrial (LA) volume, and LV outflow tract diameter—were obtained, based on the recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography . LVEF was calculated from minimal (LV end-systole just before mitral valve opening) and maximal (LV end-diastole at the start of the QRS) LV volumes, which were obtained using a modified Quinones method . LA volume was determined by the prolate ellipsoid formula and was indexed to the body surface area . Peak velocities of early diastolic filling (E) and late diastolic filling (A) were measured by the pulsed-wave Doppler method at the level of the mitral valve leaflet tips. Peak early diastolic velocity (e’) and late diastolic velocity (a’) were measured by tissue Doppler imaging from the septal mitral annulus. The E/A and E/e’ ratios were calculated to estimate the LV filling pressure . Echocardiographic data were analyzed by two cardiologists who were blinded to the patients’ other information.
Echo-Doppler–derived parameters of ventricular stiffness and ventriculo-arterial interaction
For the evaluation of the vulnerability of the LV, we measured ventricular stiffness and end-systolic ventriculo-arterial interaction using echo-Doppler [8, 9]. Ventricular diastolic elastance (Ed) was calculated as E/e’ divided by stroke volume [11, 12]. Ventricular end-systolic elastance (Ees) was required to describe the contractility of the LV and was calculated based on pulsed-wave Doppler echocardiography of trans-LV outflow tract (LVOT) as peak velocity divided by acceleration time . Peak velocity of LVOT was measured at the point of maximal velocity and acceleration time was measured as the time from the onset to the peak velocity. Effective arterial elastance (Ea) provides an integrative measure of arterial load and was defined as the ratio of end-systolic pressure to stroke volume where end-systolic pressure was calculated as (2 × systolic blood pressure + diastolic blood pressure)/3 [11, 12]. To evaluate the interaction of the ventricular and arterial systems, the ventricular–vascular coupling index (VVI) was calculated as the ratio Ea/Ees [14, 15].
Baseline characteristics were summarized for all participants using standard descriptive statistics. Continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation and categorical variables as number and percentage. Baseline characteristics of groups were compared using independent t-tests for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables. Variables without normal distribution were presented as median (inter-quartile range) and Mann-Whitney U test were used for their comparisons.
Linear regression analyses were performed to determine the association between echo-derived parameters and the HF severity, estimated by EF and levels of log-transformed brain natriuretic peptide (BNP). To achieve a constant variance, BNP values were transformed logarithmically. Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the association between Ed, Ees, Ea, and VVI, and the development of new-onset AF. Adjustment variables were selected based on the differences between two groups (AF vs. sinus rhythm) and clinical rationale; they included age, LA volume index(LAVI), and underlying disease. We also used receiver operating characteristic curves to derive cutoff values for predictors. Time-to-event data are reported and displayed using the Gehan’s generalized Wilcoxon method, with comparisons between groups performed using the log-rank testDifferences were considered statistically significant if the p-value was <0.05 when using two-sided tests. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois).
Intergroup comparison of clinical characteristics and echocardiographic parameters
(n = 292)
(n = 57)
61.2 ± 15.7
67.7 ± 12.8
Male, n (%)
Body surface area (m2)
1.71 ± 0.23
1.68 ± 0.19
122.4 ± 23.3
115.4 ± 25.2
74.1 ± 16.0
68.1 ± 14.7
Hypertension, n (%)
Diabetes mellitus, n (%)
Current smoker, n (%)
Ischemic CMP, n (%)
Chronic kidney disease, n (%)
21.7 ± 14.9
24.4 ± 21.5
1.4 ± 1.5
2.0 ± 2.3
Median: 216.0 (81.8–749)
Antiplatelet agent, n (%)
RAS blockade, n (%)
Diuretics, n (%)
* < 0.001
Beta blockade, n (%)
Calcium channel blockade, n (%)
Statin, n (%)
Ejection fraction (%)
36.9 ± 9.4
35.3 ± 10.3
52.4 ± 7.1
52.4 ± 7.9
42.0 ± 8.1
42.3 ± 8.7
37.8 ± 7.4
40.3 ± 7.5
43.9 ± 7.5
47.8 ± 8.7
52.8 ± 8.7
57.5 ± 9.7
* < 0.001
LA volume index (mm3/m2)
28.4 ± 12.7
36.1 ± 14.8
* < 0.001
LV mass index (g/m2)
73.8 ± 27.6
74.8 ± 18.9
E velocity (m/s)
0.65 ± 0.23
0.79 ± 0.30
* < 0.001
A velocity (m/s)
0.72 ± 0.22
0.71 ± 0.25
1.02 ± 0.63
1.22 ± 0.75
0.39 ± 0.27
0.55 ± 0.37
0.05 ± 0.02
0.04 ± 0.02
0.08 ± 0.02
0.07 ± 0.03
0.05 ± 0.02
0.05 ± 0.02
15.2 ± 6.8
19.1 ± 7.2
* < 0.001
0.36 ± 0.22
0.47 ± 0.27
1.02 ± 0.24
1.11 ± 0.37
2.67 ± 0.96
2.75 ± 1.43
25.5 ± 9.1
32.1 ± 16.8
The new-onset AF group was older (67.7 ± 12.8 vs. 61.2 ± 15.7, p = 0.003) and had a higher prevalence of hypertension (49.1 % vs. 32.2 %, p = 0.014) and diabetes (33.3 % vs. 17.8 %, p = 0.008). The rate of ischemic cardiomyopathy did not differ between the two groups. The new-onset AF group used more diuretics (73.7 % vs. 44.9 %, p < 0.001) than the sinus rhythm group (Table 1). This finding suggests that patients with AF may have more symptoms of heart failure and more volume overloading conditions. The median BNP level was higher (216.0 vs. 566.0, p = 0.011) in patients with AF.
There was no difference in LV end-diastolic diameter (52.4 ± 7.1 vs. 52.4 ± 7.9 mm, p = 0.964), LV systolic function (EF: 36.9 ± 9.4 % vs. 35.3 ± 10.3 %, p = 0.249), LV mass index (73.8 ± 27.6 vs. 74.8 ± 18.9 g/m2, p = 0.738), A (0.72 ± 0.22 vs. 0.71 ± 0.25 m/s, p = 0.706), or e’ (0.71 ± 0.25 vs. 0.04 ± 0.02 m/s, p = 0.278). However, the new-onset AF group had a larger LA volume index (36.1 ± 14.8 vs. 28.4 ± 12.7 mL/m2, p < 0.001), a higher E (0.79 ± 0.30 vs. 0.65 ± 0.23 m/s, p < 0.001), and a higher E/e’ ratio (19.1 ± 7.2 vs. 15.2 ± 6.8, p < 0.001). A’ was significantly lower in the new-onset AF group (0.07 ± 0.03 vs. 0.08 ± 0.02 m/s, p < 0.001) (Table 1). Among the echo-derived Doppler indexes, Ed was significantly higher (0.47 ± 0.27 vs. 0.36 ± 0.22 /mL, p = 0.009) in the new-onset AF group. Ees, Ea, and VVI did not differ significantly between the two groups.
Association of HF severity with ventricular stiffness and ventriculoarterial interaction index by univariate linear regression
* < 0.001
* < 0.001
Association between echocardiographic parameters and new-onset atrial fibrillation
Ejection fraction (%)
* < 0.001
The principle findings of this study are as follows: (1) Ventricular stiffness and ventriculo-arterial interaction could be measured by echo Doppler, and (2) Ed, Ea and VVI were closely correlated with new-onset AF in patients with HF.
The variable effect of AF on patients with HF
AF is the most common arrhythmia [4, 9] and further aggravates symptoms in patients with HF [9, 16]. AF occurs in 10–20 % of mild to moderate cases of HF and in up to 50 % of patients with more advanced HF. The prevalence of AF generally depends on the severity of the underlying HF [17, 18]. In this study, only ambulatory patients with stable HF were enrolled and new-onset AF developed in 16.3 % of patients.
The new-onset AF group was receiving diuretics at a statistically significantly higher rate (73.7 % vs. 44.9 %, p < 0.001). This finding suggests that these patients were clinically identified as having volume overload or elevated LV filling pressure and were being treated as such. Recently, Cambell et al. showed that renal impairment was strong predictor of AF in patients with HF and should be regularly screened. In our study, prevalence of chronic kidney disease was not different between AF group and sinus rhythm group.
While LV systolic function was similar between the two groups, patients with new-onset AF had significantly higher LAVI, E/e’, and Ed. These findings suggest that atrial dilation and reduced LV relaxation are related to the development of AF and could be explained by diastolic dysfunction.
The correlation between AF and diastolic dysfunction
Diastolic dysfunction, like systolic dysfunction, is known to be associated with the development of AF [11, 13]. The presence of diastolic dysfunction is also a strong predictor of AF occurrence and is closely associated with a poor prognosis in patients with HF . Diastolic dysfunction leads to elevated LV filling pressures and atrial remodeling. The relationship between atrial remodeling and AF has been investigated in many studies. Diastolic dysfunction with an increase in LV filling pressures causes atrial remodeling and is associated with a more than 5-fold increased risk of AF occurrence compared with normal diastolic function .
The assessment of diastolic dysfunction by echocardiography
LV diastolic filling pressure can be measured by Doppler echocardiography. Mitral inflow velocity (E) correlates well with LV filling pressure in heart failure; however, myocardial relaxation and filling pressure could affect the mitral E velocity. The mitral e’ velocity reflects relaxation of the myocardium and the E/e’ ratio correlates well with LV filling pressure or pulmonary capillary wedge pressure [21–23]. In this study, the AF group had significantly higher E/e’ values compared with patients in normal sinus rhythm.
In HF patients, increased ventricular stiffness induces diastolic dysfunction, thereby causing an elevation of LV filling pressure and increasing vulnerability to an acute loading change . E/e’ is significantly correlated with LV filling pressure , while stroke volume can be used as an indicator of LV filling volume. Thus, combining these parameters, dividing E/e’ by stroke volume, represents the ratio of LV filling pressure to filling volume and can be used as the Ed . We used Ed for the evaluation of ventricular stiffness in this study. We found that Ed was significantly correlated with EF and BNP, which represent HF severity. Furthermore, a higher Ed was independently associated with AF, after adjustment for age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, use of diuretics and LAVI. In addition, using receiver operating characteristic analysis, we were able to determine a cutoff value for LV filling pressure/volume, as represented by the Ed value. According to our results, the optimal cutoff value of Ed for the prediction of new-onset AF was 0.33, with a sensitivity of 71 % and a specificity of 58 %.
Increased afterload is also important in the pathophysiology of HF . The Ea was used as the total arterial afterload and can be measured noninvasively [11, 12]. In addition, the Ees is related to LV contractility, independently of loading conditions . The combination of these parameters, called VVI, is the ratio Ea/Ees and is used as an index of ventriculo-arterial coupling, as previously described . In our study, we found that Ea was closely related to HF severity. Interestingly, our study showed that Ea and VVI, as well as Ed, were predictors of new-onset AF in patients with HF, whereas Ees was not. These results suggest that ventricular stiffness and ventriculo-arterial coupling are important predictors of AF occurrence in HF patients. In addition, ventricular stiffness and ventriculo-arterial coupling are more relevant than LV contractility alone.
The present study had some limitations. First, since it was a single-center study with a retrospective design, only limited data analysis was possible and follow-up durations were arbitrary. Second, the occurrence of new-onset AF might have been underestimated. Capturing AF is notoriously difficult, unless careful transtelephonic monitoring or regular Holter recordings can be performed. We know that relying on symptomatic presentation will underestimate the occurrence of AF, given that much of AF is asymptomatic. There is no way of knowing whether patients in the “sinus rhythm” group actually had paroxysmal AF or not. Finally, the male predominance in the study patients was a potential limitation, in that it did not reflect the general clinical HF population; however, this is a common failing shared with many other contemporary HF studies.
Echo-Doppler–derived indexes of ventricular stiffness and ventriculo-arterial coupling are associated with HF severity and are important predictors of new-onset AF in patients with HF. Therefore, HF patients with increased ventricular stiffness may need close observation for the development of AF, using techniques such as frequent Holter monitoring.
We would like to thank the Medical Research Supporting Section of Yonsei University College of Medicine for providing excellent assistance with the statistical analysis.
This research received no grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Kannel WB, Abbott RD, Savage DD, McNamara PM. Epidemiologic features of chronic atrial fibrillation: the Framingham study. N Engl J Med. 1982;306(17):1018–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Khand AU, Rankin AC, Kaye GC, Cleland JG. Systematic review of the management of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2000;21(8):614–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cha YM, Redfield MM, Shen WK, Gersh BJ. Atrial fibrillation and ventricular dysfunction: a vicious electromechanical cycle. Circulation. 2004;109(23):2839–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nagarakanti R, Ezekowitz M. Diastolic dysfunction and atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2008;22(2):111–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Caldwell JC, Mamas MA. Heart failure, diastolic dysfunction and atrial fibrillation; mechanistic insight of a complex inter-relationship. Heart Fail Rev. 2012;17(1):27–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rosenberg MA, Manning WJ. Diastolic dysfunction and risk of atrial fibrillation: a mechanistic appraisal. Circulation. 2012;126(19):2353–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Poortvliet R, de Craen A, Gussekloo J, de Ruijter W. Increase in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels, renal function and cardiac disease in the oldest old. Age Ageing. 2015;44(5):841–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Neumann T, Vollmer A, Schaffner T, Hess OM, Heusch G. Diastolic dysfunction and collagen structure in canine pacing-induced heart failure. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1999;31(1):179–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ishihara H, Yokota M, Sobue T, Saito H. Relation between ventriculoarterial coupling and myocardial energetics in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23(2):406–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ky B, French B, May Khan A, Plappert T, Wang A, Chirinos JA, et al. Ventricular-arterial coupling, remodeling, and prognosis in chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(13):1165–72.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Redfield M, Jacobsen SJ, Borlaug BA, Rodeheffer RJ, Kass DA. Age- and gender-related ventricular-vascular stiffening: a community-based study. Circulation. 2005;112(15):2254–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ha J, Lee H, Park S, Choi E, Seo H, Shim C, et al. Gender-related difference in left ventricular diastolic elastance during exercise in patients with diabetes mellitus. Circ J. 2008;72(9):1443–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bauer F, Jones M, Shiota T, Firstenberg MS, Qin JX, Tsujino H, et al. Left ventricular outflow tract mean systolic acceleration as a surrogate for the slope of the left ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume relationship. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40(7):1320–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Borlaug BA, Kass DA. Ventricular-vascular interaction in heart failure. Cardiol Clin. 2011;29(3):447–59.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Her AY, Kim J, Choi E, Kim S, Jae RS, Shim CY, et al. Value of ventricular stiffness index and ventriculoarterial interaction in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Circ J. 2009;73(9):1683–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maisel WH, Stevenson LW. Atrial fibrillation in heart failure: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and rationale for therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2003;91(6A):2D–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Benjamin EJ, Levy D, Vaziri SM, D’Agostino RB, Belanger AJ, Wolf PA. Independent risk factors for atrial fibrillation in a population-based cohort. The Framingham Heart Study. JAMA. 1994;271(11):840–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Psaty BM, Manolio TA, Kuller LH, Kronmal RA, Cushman M, Fried LP, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for atrial fibrillation in older adults. Circulation. 1997;96(7):2455–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tsang TS, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ, Bailey KR, Seward JB. Risks for atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure in patients >/=65 years of age with abnormal left ventricular diastolic relaxation. Am J Cardiol. 2004;93(1):54–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tsang TS, Gersh BJ, Appleton CP, Tajik AJ, Barnes ME, Bailey KR, et al. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction as a predictor of the first diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in 840 elderly men and women. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40(9):1636–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Park J, Marwick TH. Use and Limitations of E/e’ to Assess Left Ventricular Filling Pressure by Echocardiography. J Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2011;19(4):169–73.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nagueh SF, Middleton KJ, Kopelen HA, Zoghbi WA, Quiñones MA. Doppler tissue imaging: a noninvasive technique for evaluation of left ventricular relaxation and estimation of filling pressures. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30(6):1527–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nagueh SF, Sun H, Kopelen HA, Middleton KJ, Khoury DS. Hemodynamic determinants of the mitral annulus diastolic velocities by tissue Doppler. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37(1):278–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kawasaki D, Kosugi K, Waki H, Yamamoto K, Tsujino T, Masuyama T. Role of activated renin-angiotensin system in myocardial fibrosis and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in diabetic patients--reversal by chronic angiotensin II type 1A receptor blockade. Circ J. 2007;71(4):524–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Park RC, Little WC, O’Rourke RA. Effect of alteration of left ventricular activation sequence on the left ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume relation in closed-chest dogs. Circ Res. 1985;57(5):706–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar